Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chief Justice Roberts opts out of Senate trial; Leaky Leahy to preside

NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
in Tug Tavern
It’s the correct Constitutional move for this partisan show trial.



· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,317 Founders Club
    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/81577/impeachment-game-thread#latest
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Good move distancing himself from this Democrat show trial.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,406
    Fuck CJ Roberts
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,937
    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Tequilla said:

    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024

    Orange Man will be 78 in 2024. Neither party would be dumb enough to nominate someone that old to be President. Even 74 was pushing it with Drumpf.

    Oh, wait...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024

    That's the ostensibly rational reason. The real reason is vengeance. Sub-reason, a distraction from other shit.

    I'm not going to read this (140 pages). However, the fact this paper is from 2001 removes it from the current climate.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,738 Standard Supporter
    Just look at the articles that are linked daily at Real Clear Politics by the pundits.

    They all same the exact same thing - all from the right are the same and all from the left are the same. Rarely will there be an article that is middle of the road and logical.

    The media pushes the extremes. to make money.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited January 2021
    This is merely a continuation of the Hollywood Production. The City State of
    Washington DC, which is an Agent of The City of London and Vatican City,
    has no jurisdiction to impeach a President or Resident of a Foreign Nation,
    i.e. a President or Resident of The Republic of the United States.







    Disconnect yourself from all Mainstream Media and watch more films.

    The News is Fake. The Movies are Real. The NWO is required to reveal
    their Plans for the World, and are forbidden to deviate from the
    Cardinal Rule. Pay close attention to Hollywood Films, they are one of
    the methods of Illuminati Revelation.

    #Amexem
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,505
    edited January 2021
    Tequilla said:

    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024

    There is some financial benefit if he gets convicted. As he loses these if convicted:

    1) Office spacing and staffing allowance

    2) Annual pension, roughly $221k year

    3) $1m annual travel allowance, and former first lady gets $500k

    But the greatest benefit is that it creates a distraction from the incoherence and stumbling you'll see and hear on a daily basis from Biden.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,738 Standard Supporter
    greenblood said:

    Tequilla said:

    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024

    There is some financial benefit if he gets convicted. As he loses these if convicted:

    1) Office spacing and staffing allowance

    2) Annual pension, roughly $221k year

    3) $1m annual travel allowance, and former first lady gets $500k

    But the greatest benefit is that it creates a distraction from the incoherence and stumbling you'll see and hear on a daily basis from Biden.


    Not even sure if that happens. This would be breaking new ground for the impeachment and the impact if convicted.

    it will all go to court. The Supremes will rule in favor of whatever Epstein wants - see previous poast with details about Epstein
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,376 Standard Supporter
    If the chief justice refuses you can't have an impeachment.

    Of course no due process already precluded any impeachment.

    This is to attract attention while they hand us over to China.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    greenblood said:

    Tequilla said:

    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024

    There is some financial benefit if he gets convicted. As he loses these if convicted:

    1) Office spacing and staffing allowance

    2) Annual pension, roughly $221k year

    3) $1m annual travel allowance, and former first lady gets $500k

    But the greatest benefit is that it creates a distraction from the incoherence and stumbling you'll see and hear on a daily basis from Biden.


    Chinteresting. Would he loose secret service detail as well?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    That doesn’t look like John Roberts at all.

    Although the real Roberts looks like a pedophile to me and is obviously compromised in some way. Rewriting Obamacare as a tax was simply a miscarriage of justice by SCOTUS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,800

    Since he is out that means it is 100% unconstitutional
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,993
    Shocker on this...sounds like a trial worthy of a #BananaRepublic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,848 Swaye's Wigwam
    Goduckies said:


    Since he is out that means it is 100% unconstitutional

    Seems like something that could easily be decided before a trial and subsequent 14th amendment challenge.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,800
    It comes in to play when Trump runs in 2024 and the dems try and sue to keep him out and that assumes he is even convicted. He won't be.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    greenblood said:

    Tequilla said:

    What’s the point of impeaching someone that is no longer in office? Not sure I’ve heard a single good reason other than it keeps Bad Orange Man from running in 2024

    There is some financial benefit if he gets convicted. As he loses these if convicted:

    1) Office spacing and staffing allowance

    2) Annual pension, roughly $221k year

    3) $1m annual travel allowance, and former first lady gets $500k

    But the greatest benefit is that it creates a distraction from the incoherence and stumbling you'll see and hear on a daily basis from Biden.


    Chinteresting. Would he loose secret service detail as well?
    Yes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.