Home› College Football Forum

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

It is Tim

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
in College Football Forum
To take Notre Dame off of college football Mt Rushmore. The echoes are not waking up.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,543 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    To take Notre Dame off of college football Mt Rushmore. The echoes are not waking up.

    It has been a long tim since they were truly elite
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    YellowSnow said:

    To take Notre Dame off of college football Mt Rushmore. The echoes are not waking up.

    It has been a long tim since they were truly elite
    27 years to be precise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • biak1biak1 Member Posts: 4,179
    They still have 8 nattys according to ESPN, but yeah. Propped up bigly by the media.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,257
    YellowSnow said:

    To take Notre Dame off of college football Mt Rushmore. The echoes are not waking up.

    Absofuckinglutely. They have waltzed into big bowls with lower credentials more often than any other program. Not saying this year. I don't have a compelling alternate for #4; though I think there are several other teams outside of the Big 3 that are just as good as they are this year.

    It's Bama, Clemson, Buck and, when they feel like it, LSU.

    Everyone else is varying degrees of OK.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,257
    YellowSnow said:

    biak1 said:

    They still have 8 nattys according to ESPN, but yeah. Propped up bigly by the media.

    The overall legacy is there, but when you haven’t been elite since 1993 enough is enough. 2016 UW was better than either of ND’s playoff teams. And we fucking suck.
    It's not that they lose on this stage. They lose bigly and embarrassingly. They prove what Brian Kelley, and Brian Kelley, said they needed to disprove before the game: that they don't belong on that field. And they don't.

    This isn't even the most tippy toppy-est of Bamers team, and they were never in it. Not at all for even a second. I don't want to hear about if this or if that ... they weren't ever in it and added a cosmetic TD at the end to make it look slightly less embarrassing.

    They were never going to win this game and would lose 10 out of 10.

    How they ever beat Clemson even once I'll never know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746
    creepycoug said:

    YellowSnow said:

    biak1 said:

    They still have 8 nattys according to ESPN, but yeah. Propped up bigly by the media.

    The overall legacy is there, but when you haven’t been elite since 1993 enough is enough. 2016 UW was better than either of ND’s playoff teams. And we fucking suck.
    It's not that they lose on this stage. They lose bigly and embarrassingly. They prove what Brian Kelley, and Brian Kelley, said they needed to disprove before the game: that they don't belong on that field. And they don't.

    This isn't even the most tippy toppy-est of Bamers team, and they were never in it. Not at all for even a second. I don't want to hear about if this or if that ... they weren't ever in it and added a cosmetic TD at the end to make it look slightly less embarrassing.

    They were never going to win this game and would lose 10 out of 10.

    How they ever beat Clemson even once I'll never know.
    I think it is the best Bama team but I agree with the rest of this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    YellowSnow said:

    biak1 said:

    They still have 8 nattys according to ESPN, but yeah. Propped up bigly by the media.

    The overall legacy is there, but when you haven’t been elite since 1993 enough is enough. 2016 UW was better than either of ND’s playoff teams. And we fucking suck.
    It's not that they lose on this stage. They lose bigly and embarrassingly. They prove what Brian Kelley, and Brian Kelley, said they needed to disprove before the game: that they don't belong on that field. And they don't.

    This isn't even the most tippy toppy-est of Bamers team, and they were never in it. Not at all for even a second. I don't want to hear about if this or if that ... they weren't ever in it and added a cosmetic TD at the end to make it look slightly less embarrassing.

    They were never going to win this game and would lose 10 out of 10.

    How they ever beat Clemson even once I'll never know.
    COVID ese. That’s why they beat Clemson.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    YellowSnow said:

    biak1 said:

    They still have 8 nattys according to ESPN, but yeah. Propped up bigly by the media.

    The overall legacy is there, but when you haven’t been elite since 1993 enough is enough. 2016 UW was better than either of ND’s playoff teams. And we fucking suck.
    It's not that they lose on this stage. They lose bigly and embarrassingly. They prove what Brian Kelley, and Brian Kelley, said they needed to disprove before the game: that they don't belong on that field. And they don't.

    This isn't even the most tippy toppy-est of Bamers team, and they were never in it. Not at all for even a second. I don't want to hear about if this or if that ... they weren't ever in it and added a cosmetic TD at the end to make it look slightly less embarrassing.

    They were never going to win this game and would lose 10 out of 10.

    How they ever beat Clemson even once I'll never know.
    It’s just too bad Miamuh can’t get there shit together and win another Natty @creepycoug . 6 NTs and 3 runner ups in 4 decades would merit consideration. But you’re backing me into a corner with Oklahoma. USC still safe for now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,257
    YellowSnow said:

    creepycoug said:

    YellowSnow said:

    biak1 said:

    They still have 8 nattys according to ESPN, but yeah. Propped up bigly by the media.

    The overall legacy is there, but when you haven’t been elite since 1993 enough is enough. 2016 UW was better than either of ND’s playoff teams. And we fucking suck.
    It's not that they lose on this stage. They lose bigly and embarrassingly. They prove what Brian Kelley, and Brian Kelley, said they needed to disprove before the game: that they don't belong on that field. And they don't.

    This isn't even the most tippy toppy-est of Bamers team, and they were never in it. Not at all for even a second. I don't want to hear about if this or if that ... they weren't ever in it and added a cosmetic TD at the end to make it look slightly less embarrassing.

    They were never going to win this game and would lose 10 out of 10.

    How they ever beat Clemson even once I'll never know.
    It’s just too bad Miamuh can’t get there shit together and win another Natty @creepycoug . 6 NTs and 3 runner ups in 4 decades would merit consideration. But you’re backing me into a corner with Oklahoma. USC still safe for now.
    No fix on the horizon either IMO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    creepycoug said:

    YellowSnow said:

    To take Notre Dame off of college football Mt Rushmore. The echoes are not waking up.

    Absofuckinglutely. They have waltzed into big bowls with lower credentials more often than any other program. Not saying this year. I don't have a compelling alternate for #4; though I think there are several other teams outside of the Big 3 that are just as good as they are this year.

    It's Bama, Clemson, Buck and, when they feel like it, LSU.

    Everyone else is varying degrees of OK.
    Not even when they feel like it. LSU is back to their usual underperforming after one year of a generational quarterback and an absurd stack of talent across the roster. They're not getting that back any time soon with O at the helm.

    Georgia and OK are clearly in tier 2 below the big 3. After them it's another huge gulf before you get to the rest of the nobodies of college football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,943 Founders Club
    If they actually enforced rules like they used to, Bammer and the Ohio State instantly lose 30 scholarships and lose postseason for two seasons. As does whOregon.

    I know, crazy, revolutionary idea here. I remember Bammer getting slapped pretty hard in the late 90s. Let's bring that back. Start with the SEC....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    creepycoug said:

    YellowSnow said:

    To take Notre Dame off of college football Mt Rushmore. The echoes are not waking up.

    Absofuckinglutely. They have waltzed into big bowls with lower credentials more often than any other program. Not saying this year. I don't have a compelling alternate for #4; though I think there are several other teams outside of the Big 3 that are just as good as they are this year.

    It's Bama, Clemson, Buck and, when they feel like it, LSU.

    Everyone else is varying degrees of OK.
    #myFaggies are a sleeping giant.

    Burn it with fire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.