Attention Jimmy Lake and Jen Cohen

DerekJohnson

This is how it's done!

http://twitter.com/DylanEveryday/status/1343223969936248833

bananasnblondes

I really hope I'm wrong but part of me thinks Jimmy Lake and staff saw the covid thing as a way to get an early paid vacation

RaceBannon

bananasnblondes said:

I really hope I'm wrong but part of me thinks Jimmy Lake and staff saw the covid thing as a way to get an early paid vacation

Never bet against human nature

YellowSnow

Time to take SC off Mt Rushmore. They can’t swing the big dick like this.

Tequilla

bananasnblondes said:

I really hope I'm wrong but part of me thinks Jimmy Lake and staff saw the covid thing as a way to get an early paid vacation

You’re wrong

YellowSnow

bananasnblondes said:

I really hope I'm wrong but part of me thinks Jimmy Lake and staff saw the covid thing as a way to get an early paid vacation

Yeah I’m sure Jimmy would totally pass up an easy chance at house money in Year 1.

GrundleStiltzkin

https://twitter.com/mlm7q/status/1344148942892662784?s=21

Colorado is serious about football

RaceBannon

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/mlm7q/status/1344148942892662784?s=21

Colorado is serious about football

All the excuses made for Jenn and UW ring hollow

TheRoarOfTheCrowd

stanford could see their dilemna in advance so they moved their team for i think 10 days to be able to play. i don't know our details so it isn't fair to say it but it feels like like they didn't do everything they could have to play.

Maybe that was the right thing but it seems clear that other teams made other decisions as they faced a similar dilemma.

LebamDawg

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/mlm7q/status/1344148942892662784?s=21

Colorado is serious about football

I saw 2 minutes of the game v Texas, they didn't look to serious two me

yes I had to edit this

Pitchfork51

LebamDawg said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/mlm7q/status/1344148942892662784?s=21

Colorado is serious about football

I saw 2 minutes of the game v Texas, they didn't look to serious two me

yes I had to edit this

Well that's because their 49 players suck.

DodgyBloke

if my math is correct you need 11 for offense and 11 for defense worst case scenario so what the fuck you worried about more than 53 man roster get the fuck in the game. You'll lose but get the fuck in the game

UW_Doog_Bot

Jen and Jimmy don't give a fuck. Hth.

DerekJohnson

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/mlm7q/status/1344148942892662784?s=21

Colorado is serious about football

This is just embarrassing for Washington. Fucking embarrassing.

HuskyJW

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/mlm7q/status/1344148942892662784?s=21

Colorado is serious about football

They looked it

1to392831weretaken

I think the Colorado game and their roster numbers phrase the debate in an excellent way:

What's better for the UW football program as an end to the season?
1.) Ending the season by getting embarrassingly smoked two or three times in a row (starting with Stanford).
2.) Getting the 'rona, hanging the North banner, passing off the conference title to hated rival. w/respect.

I don't think there is a third option here. If the numbers weren't just a total lie, UW would have looked like Colorado. Could have looked even worse. UW's defense, for instance, consists of about four or five NFL starters and then a massive cliff to the rest. Could you imagine UW lining up against Oregon or USC without, for instance, Ulofoshio? Or playing 60 minutes with an OLB pairing of true freshmen Smalls and McDonald?

So--I'm legit asking--what is better here for the program? Pussing out and hanging a pathetic, meaningless banner but gifting conference champ bragging rights to Oregon or getting absolutely buttfucked by USC but in the process denying Oregon a chance to play? For as pissed off as everyone is, I don't see either as a particularly appealing choice.

haie

1to392831weretaken said:

I think the Colorado game and their roster numbers phrase the debate in an excellent way:

What's better for the UW football program as an end to the season?
1.) Ending the season by getting embarrassingly smoked two or three times in a row (starting with Stanford).
2.) Getting the 'rona, hanging the North banner, passing off the conference title to hated rival. w/respect.

I don't think there is a third option here. If the numbers weren't just a total lie, UW would have looked like Colorado. Could have looked even worse. UW's defense, for instance, consists of about four or five NFL starters and then a massive cliff to the rest. Could you imagine UW lining up against Oregon or USC without, for instance, Ulofoshio? Or playing 60 minutes with an OLB pairing of true freshmen Smalls and McDonald?

So--I'm legit asking--what is better here for the program? Pussing out and hanging a pathetic, meaningless banner but gifting conference champ bragging rights to Oregon or getting absolutely buttfucked by USC but in the process denying Oregon a chance to play? For as pissed off as everyone is, I don't see either as a particularly appealing choice.

Much better to stay in people's minds, stay in the minds of people from whom you'll be begging for ticket/donation money next year, announce how depleted you are, and play every game you can.

Especially the pac 12 Championship game.

Fuck good sportsmanship.

RaceBannon

Players want to play

Emoterman

1to392831weretaken said:

I think the Colorado game and their roster numbers phrase the debate in an excellent way:

What's better for the UW football program as an end to the season?
1.) Ending the season by getting embarrassingly smoked two or three times in a row (starting with Stanford).
2.) Getting the 'rona, hanging the North banner, passing off the conference title to hated rival. w/respect.

I don't think there is a third option here. If the numbers weren't just a total lie, UW would have looked like Colorado. Could have looked even worse. UW's defense, for instance, consists of about four or five NFL starters and then a massive cliff to the rest. Could you imagine UW lining up against Oregon or USC without, for instance, Ulofoshio? Or playing 60 minutes with an OLB pairing of true freshmen Smalls and McDonald?

So--I'm legit asking--what is better here for the program? Pussing out and hanging a pathetic, meaningless banner but gifting conference champ bragging rights to Oregon or getting absolutely buttfucked by USC but in the process denying Oregon a chance to play? For as pissed off as everyone is, I don't see either as a particularly appealing choice.

RaceBannon

DerekJohnson

1to392831weretaken said:

I think the Colorado game and their roster numbers phrase the debate in an excellent way:

What's better for the UW football program as an end to the season?
1.) Ending the season by getting embarrassingly smoked two or three times in a row (starting with Stanford).
2.) Getting the 'rona, hanging the North banner, passing off the conference title to hated rival. w/respect.

I don't think there is a third option here. If the numbers weren't just a total lie, UW would have looked like Colorado. Could have looked even worse. UW's defense, for instance, consists of about four or five NFL starters and then a massive cliff to the rest. Could you imagine UW lining up against Oregon or USC without, for instance, Ulofoshio? Or playing 60 minutes with an OLB pairing of true freshmen Smalls and McDonald?

So--I'm legit asking--what is better here for the program? Pussing out and hanging a pathetic, meaningless banner but gifting conference champ bragging rights to Oregon or getting absolutely buttfucked by USC but in the process denying Oregon a chance to play? For as pissed off as everyone is, I don't see either as a particularly appealing choice.

That assumes as fact that we would have lost in embarrassing fashion, and you don't know that. Many X factors. And how do you know that USC wouldn't have been hit with something similar and entered the game short-handed? So the way you framed the question makes it meaningless to answer.