Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.
Seems like a really well done study.
Because none of that happens in real life right? Everyone wears them always and perfectly. FYI the airborne virus goes right through them. But you do you dingbat.
Post a larger and better study. I'll look. I think this may be the largest I've seen so far.
The study admits inconclusive results. No blinding and self reported results are two of the biggest things to look for to tell if a study is bullshit. It did both.
It’s worthless, unless, you’re all up in your feelings over masks.
Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.
Seems like a really well done study.
Because none of that happens in real life right? Everyone wears them always and perfectly. FYI the airborne virus goes right through them. But you do you dingbat.
Post a larger and better study. I'll look. I think this may be the largest I've seen so far.
The study admits inconclusive results. No blinding and self reported results are two of the biggest things to look for to tell if a study is bullshit. It did bothered.
It’s worthless, unless, you’re all up in your feelings over masks.
The study does not admit inconclusive results. Did you read the actual “Conclusion” in the abstract, you fucking retard? Do you know how all field studies on humans are done, dipshit? Unless you keep your subjects locked up and observed 24/7, which you probably believe is what happens, there are always limitations and variables.
Let me guess. You also believe the model-based “studies” on global warming while embarrassing yourself criticizing a valid and controlled research study in this thread.
Why do you post here? Do you enjoy getting humiliated?
Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.
Seems like a really well done study.
Because none of that happens in real life right? Everyone wears them always and perfectly. FYI the airborne virus goes right through them. But you do you dingbat.
Post a larger and better study. I'll look. I think this may be the largest I've seen so far.
The study admits inconclusive results. No blinding and self reported results are two of the biggest things to look for to tell if a study is bullshit. It did both.
It’s worthless, unless, you’re all up in your feelings over masks.
They work in crowds or if people cough all over other people like slobs. Besides that, they're nearly useless. They make sense in dense countries. This isn't a dense country.
Comments
It’s worthless, unless, you’re all up in your feelings over masks.
Nobody said it was
Just do what you're told boy
Let me guess. You also believe the model-based “studies” on global warming while embarrassing yourself criticizing a valid and controlled research study in this thread.
Why do you post here? Do you enjoy getting humiliated?
It’s not a disease, it’s a virus. Some of you need to learn the difference.