Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fine group of propagandists.
Comments
-
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center.
-
Yep, American built ships were faster and cheaper than the European competition. I'm sure that had something to do with slavery and violence.WestlinnDuck said:
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center. -
Just shows you how proudly ignorant and gullible our so-called intellectual elites are. The leftards on this board might be able to light up a dim bulb if hooked up in parallel.SFGbob said:
Yep, American built ships were faster and cheaper than the European competition. I'm sure that had something to do with slavery and violence.WestlinnDuck said:
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center. -
Nobody ever mentions the Barbary Pirates and their awful contributions to suffering, death, enslavement and subjugation of everything in the Mediterranean, up and down the African Coast and all the way up to the British Isles.WestlinnDuck said:
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center.
It's almost as if it debunks the idea that White Europeans invented and dominated slavery in the Middle Ages.
I wonder why that is? Inconvenient Truth? -
-
There are still Somalian pirates active today. It’s not reported in the West because it goes against the Leftist narrative. Captain Phillips was the last time you’ll hear about it and the truth of that piracy is much worse than portrayed in the film.TurdBomber said:
Nobody ever mentions the Barbary Pirates and their awful contributions to suffering, death, enslavement and subjugation of everything in the Mediterranean, up and down the African Coast and all the way up to the British Isles.WestlinnDuck said:
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center.
It's almost as if it debunks the idea that White Europeans invented and dominated slavery in the Middle Ages.
I wonder why that is? Inconvenient Truth? -
Mostly peaceful islamic pirates.NorthwestFresh said:
There are still Somalian pirates active today. It’s not reported in the West because it goes against the Leftist narrative. Captain Phillips was the last time you’ll hear about it and the truth of that piracy is much worse than portrayed in the film.TurdBomber said:
Nobody ever mentions the Barbary Pirates and their awful contributions to suffering, death, enslavement and subjugation of everything in the Mediterranean, up and down the African Coast and all the way up to the British Isles.WestlinnDuck said:
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center.
It's almost as if it debunks the idea that White Europeans invented and dominated slavery in the Middle Ages.
I wonder why that is? Inconvenient Truth?
-
Leach is recruiting Globally now?
-
@TheKobeStopper got awfully quiet in this thread after being asked to make an actual point.
-
He's looking frantically on the internet to find a valid point. Wait a week.EsophagealFeces said:@TheKobeStopper got awfully quiet in this thread after being asked to make an actual point.
-
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
Mostly peaceful 200 million.RoadTrip said:
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
Ok, capitalism has killed 2 billion. You lose.RoadTrip said:
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
Dumb as a fucking rockTheKobeStopper said:
Ok, capitalism has killed 2 billion. You lose.RoadTrip said:
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
I'd be on the rock on an actual IQ test.RoadTrip said:
Dumb as a fucking rockTheKobeStopper said:
Ok, capitalism has killed 2 billion. You lose.RoadTrip said:
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
Sounds like loser talk.RoadTrip said:
Dumb as a fucking rockTheKobeStopper said:
Ok, capitalism has killed 2 billion. You lose.RoadTrip said:
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
I’m old enuff to remember when you were an edgy witty basketball fan before you went insane
-
Dribble ball doesn’t take much intelligence to enjoy and gain knowledge of the game.doogie said:I’m old enuff to remember when you were an edgy witty basketball fan before you went insane
-
Name One.TheKobeStopper said:
Ok, capitalism has killed 2 billion. You lose.RoadTrip said:
200,000,000 in the 20th century aloneTheKobeStopper said:
Yeah and when I asked for the death by communism number you refused to answer. Sad!hardhat said:
“Any time you want to compare the death counts of capitalism and socialism, I’m down.”TheKobeStopper said:
Apparently in the 1950s.Bob_C said:
Educate me, when did capitalism start?TheKobeStopper said:
You’re basically conceding by creating the arbitrary time frame. Capitalism’s deaths don’t count unless it was at the exact same time as communism! That’s wild.hardhat said:@TheKobeStopper is a fucking pussy that thinks the deaths from the Great Leap Forward are less than those from’capitalism’ in the same time frame.
Those are your words. We can already tell that you’ll walk this back by saying all comparisons are arbitrary. You suck at economics and hiistory, and your analogies are hyperbolic. -
Check your draft height privilege.SFGbob said:
Yep, American built ships were faster and cheaper than the European competition. I'm sure that had something to do with slavery and violence.WestlinnDuck said:
Also American exceptionalism. Americans were building better faster ships and the crew quality was also exceptional. One reason the British dominated the French and Spanish navy was a much higher quality officer and seaman class. The English had trouble with the infantile US fleet. The Euros were paying off the Barbary pirates because they didn't think it was worth the potential loss of ships and men to deal with them. Not so much the Americans in the day. Now? We are about to become China's bitch again.SFGbob said:
Correction to this, a small percentage of the ships built in America were used for the slave trade. The overwhelming majority of all ships built in America were not used in the slave trade. The US Shipbuilding industry continued to expand and dominate the market long after the slave trade into the US had been abolished in 1808. The availability of cheap, easy to access raw materials was the initial driver in dominance of the American ship building industry, not the slave trade.SFGbob said:
I see, you're doubling down on dumbfuck. Ship building in the Americas occurred mostly around the New England region. There was no slave labor used in the construction of any of these ships and most of the boats built were for fishing. Of the cargo and freighter ships built in America few if any were used for the transportation of slaves. The availability of easy to access and cheap raw materials helped the American shipbuilding industry to dominate the market. Slavery had nothing to do with it. Whatever you've paid for you education you should demand a refund.TheKobeStopper said:SFGbob said:
Tell me how the early American shipbuilding industry was built on violence. Btw, can you cite for me the countries that exist today that were formed and created without any violence? Feel free to list the Socialist paradises you love to worship.TheKobeStopper said:
America exists because of violence from a revolutionary war, the land was taken with violence and our economy was built on violence. What the fuck are you talking about.hardhat said:Hitler and Marx both needed violence to achieve their goals. The left is shitting on the working class and losing support from immigrants and their fetishisized ‘people of color’. Who is going to march for the progressive woketards? We’re all fucking terrified.
Dems shit on the working class but they’re not the left, they’re the center.
