Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What I'm hearing...

It is really the quality of the recruits that matters not the quantity and UW was in the top 15 by average star quality.

Lets hear it for this new staff- outstanding job, in a pandemic nonetheless.

Just what I'm hearing out here, don't twist.

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,846 Founders Club
    I've seen the average star quality argument used before. It didn't end well
  • BonedogBonedog Member Posts: 650
    edited December 2020



    I’m hearing these two are numbnuts
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    People don't understand the damage CHAZ did to the program. Jimmy's had a lot to clean-up, and frankly he's done a FANTASTIC job given what he had to work with.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,880

    People don't understand the damage CHAZ did to the program. Jimmy's had a lot to clean-up, and frankly he's done a FANTASTIC job given what he had to work with.

    Ya think CHAZ would help us!
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,789
    I’m pro average star rankings in almost every case.

    When you take a knee and opt out of a class, that would be the exception.

    Truth is the star average is only decent because Sam is propping it up.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,789

    dnc said:

    I’m pro average star rankings in almost every case.

    When you take a knee and opt out of a class, that would be the exception.

    Truth is the star average is only decent because Sam is propping it up.

    The average star thing is a good gauge if you're comparing a team with 20 commits to a team with 27 commits. The average star ranking needs to be much higher than this if you're only taking 15 commits.
    I honestly don’t disagree
Sign In or Register to comment.