Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
PM to DoogCourics
Comments
-
HurtfulCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Post game sitting by the fire Mrs Nacho says, “what’s the NFL division where the 1st place team is 4&7?”DoogCourics said:Oh, I forgot to give the positives:
- I got to get drunk by the early afternoon
- I got to hate watch a game, which hasn’t happened in awhile
- The rest of the Pac-12 still sucks, and nothing can be expected in this Covid season, beat Oregon and USC and you still win a Pac-12 title and can play in a NY6 Bowel to salvage something of this mess because banners fly forever
Me: the NFC East.
Mrs Nacho: the Pac-12 is the NFC East of college football.
-
Spoken like a man with experience.Swaye said:
Always refreshing to see someone accept their ridicule like a man.DoogCourics said:
You were all right. I was wrong.
I really don’t have anything else to say.
Fuck me.
-
Haha maybe once, but now Swaye’s wife got his ballz tucked anyway somewhereDerekJohnson said:
Spoken like a man with experience.Swaye said:
Always refreshing to see someone accept their ridicule like a man.DoogCourics said:
You were all right. I was wrong.
I really don’t have anything else to say.
Fuck me. -
I also say we are no worse off today with Jimmy than we would be with Pete. Whether that is good or bad is up to the readerFireCohen said:As the great @RaceBannon said jimmy sucks until he doesn’t
-
This X 10. This has been the entire season. And all of the warts that you have listed and that many on here have been describing since the end of the second game are the obvious issues.DoogCourics said:
This right here. The final drive was the epitome of this game. 8 min on the clock, Stanford ball on their own 12. All 3 timeouts left.pawz said:
Disagree. If you're going to allow yourself to be bullied, you don't deserve to win.NoWarningJustDawg said:Eh, you're fine.
...I believe it was already decided that fault belongs to @dnc this week?
You had 88 yards and 8 minutes to get the ball back and let your offense go win the game against a defense that had given up 23 in the half.
Instead Stanford marched down the entire length of the field while chewing up the whole clock. Played well on 1st and 2nd down but allowed a 3rd and 10 conversion and a 3rd and 11 conversion.
That wasn’t just one drive, that was the story of the entire game. But that drive gave the opportunity to flip the script and win a game you shouldn’t have.
Instead, you folded like a pair of 2s.
And that’s not even including having the ball on the 10 after a momentum shifting turnover and run back, and you lost 17 yards and settled for a FG.
As @pawz said, you didn’t deserve to win
The staff clearly needs to hire you as our spokesman to assist in do's and don't do's for game planning and you are going to have to watch over player development and be willing to step in and kick some ass as the player chart is being discussed.
I propose a beginning salary of 2 million with incentives stacked on top because of the obvious value and "missing link" shit that you will be adding ~ does that work for you? I'm hoping so, because so far this has been like trying to teach the secrets of door knob science technology to Dawgs. -
Swaye said:
Always refreshing to see someone accept their ridicule like a man.DoogCourics said:
You were all right. I was wrong.
I really don’t have anything else to say.
Fuck me.
I completely agree. Tremendous cajones!
-
DawgsCanDance said:
This X 10. This has been the entire season. And all of the warts that you have listed and that many on here have been describing since the end of the second game are the obvious issues.DoogCourics said:
This right here. The final drive was the epitome of this game. 8 min on the clock, Stanford ball on their own 12. All 3 timeouts left.pawz said:
Disagree. If you're going to allow yourself to be bullied, you don't deserve to win.NoWarningJustDawg said:Eh, you're fine.
...I believe it was already decided that fault belongs to @dnc this week?
You had 88 yards and 8 minutes to get the ball back and let your offense go win the game against a defense that had given up 23 in the half.
Instead Stanford marched down the entire length of the field while chewing up the whole clock. Played well on 1st and 2nd down but allowed a 3rd and 10 conversion and a 3rd and 11 conversion.
That wasn’t just one drive, that was the story of the entire game. But that drive gave the opportunity to flip the script and win a game you shouldn’t have.
Instead, you folded like a pair of 2s.
And that’s not even including having the ball on the 10 after a momentum shifting turnover and run back, and you lost 17 yards and settled for a FG.
As @pawz said, you didn’t deserve to win
The staff clearly needs to hire you as our spokesman to assist in do's and don't do's for game planning and you are going to have to watch over player development and be willing to step in and kick some ass as the player chart is being discussed.
I propose a beginning salary of 2 million with incentives stacked on top because of the obvious value and "missing link" shit that you will be adding ~ does that work for you? I'm hoping so, because so far this has been like trying to teach the secrets of door knob science technology to Dawgs.
I mean, you’re asking a lot, but I’m willing to take this challenge and minuscule salary on for all of you. -
Jimmy is soft
-
I say better, at least no one can acuse Jimmy of racismRaceBannon said:
I also say we are no worse off today with Jimmy than we would be with Pete. Whether that is good or bad is up to the readerFireCohen said:As the great @RaceBannon said jimmy sucks until he doesn’t
-
2020 isn't overFireCohen said:
I say better, at least no one can acuse Jimmy of racismRaceBannon said:
I also say we are no worse off today with Jimmy than we would be with Pete. Whether that is good or bad is up to the readerFireCohen said:As the great @RaceBannon said jimmy sucks until he doesn’t
