Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who wins the Super Bowl?

PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,315 Founders Club
edited January 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board

Who wins the Super Bowl? 38 votes

Denver Broncos
18%
topdawgncPurpleBazePurpleJBlackiedncpoc81PatHadenFS 7 votes
Seattle Seahawks
81%
DerekJohnsonTierbsHsotBoobsFire_Marshall_BillPostGameOrangeSlicesBennyBeaverDawgtonaCirrhosisDawgTailgaterMad_Son[Deleted User]CuntWaffle[Deleted User]dhdawgUWhuskytskeetGladstoneTTJMadHuskyThe_UndertakerchuckDoogieMcDoogerson 31 votes
«13

Comments

  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,081 Swaye's Wigwam
    Seattle Seahawks
    Good matchup for Seattle.

    It's gonna be crazy. I'll be in chat all day.
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Seattle Seahawks
    Blow out.
  • SandyHookerSandyHooker Member Posts: 343
    Seattle Seahawks
    I think the Seahawks win rather easily, say 34-17
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Seattle Seahawks
    I'll take the field. Also, the O/U on Seahawk interceptions of Manning is 5.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,315 Founders Club
    Denver Broncos
    I like Omaha in this one.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
    Denver Broncos
    Refs.

    It's in the script.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,907
    Seattle Seahawks
    Noodle arm in the snow throwing ducks out there ... I agree with the Hawks winning rather easily ... say 34-17.

    In all seriousness, the Hawks defense can and should be able to put pressure with the front 4 and marginal blitzes - they've done so all season.

    Manning doesn't have the arm to be able to beat us down the field - particularly in what should be cold and probably windy conditions.

    I expect that we'll roll our Cover 3 up a bit and make it not only hard, but extremely punishing on the Denver WRs for their short routes.

    Denver's defense will probably be the worst that we've seen in well over a month. Beast should have a huge game and I expect that Wilson will make at least a handful of plays moving out of the pocket.

    Denver will get their yards, but they will make more mistakes than we will ... it's part of the Manning legend in big games.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Seattle Seahawks
    Tequilla said:

    Noodle arm in the snow throwing ducks out there ... I agree with the Hawks winning rather easily ... say 34-17.

    In all seriousness, the Hawks defense can and should be able to put pressure with the front 4 and marginal blitzes - they've done so all season.

    Manning doesn't have the arm to be able to beat us down the field - particularly in what should be cold and probably windy conditions.

    I expect that we'll roll our Cover 3 up a bit and make it not only hard, but extremely punishing on the Denver WRs for their short routes.

    Denver's defense will probably be the worst that we've seen in well over a month. Beast should have a huge game and I expect that Wilson will make at least a handful of plays moving out of the pocket.

    Denver will get their yards, but they will make more mistakes than we will ... it's part of the Peyton Manning legend in big games.

    Eli is money in big games.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,907
    Seattle Seahawks
    Is Eli playing in this game?

    Last I checked, this Hawks team bitch slapped Eli 23-0 and forced him into 5 picks in the same building.

    So if Eli is the more successful Manning in big games, then Peyton better start praying right now.
  • SteveInSheltonSteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    Peyton was throwing ducks against NE and still somehow completing them. That one throw to Welker that just kind of hovered in the air for a while and was still caught was pathetic. I think the refs will keep Peyton in the game but Seattle wins in another ugly (beautiful) game.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Seattle Seahawks
    Tequilla said:

    Is Eli playing in this game?

    Last I checked, this Hawks team bitch slapped Eli 23-0 and forced him into 5 picks in the same building.

    So if Eli is the more successful Manning in big games, then Peyton better start praying right now.

    That 23-0 game wasn't a big game for Eli. His team was already done.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,081 Swaye's Wigwam
    Seattle Seahawks

    Peyton was throwing ducks against NE and still somehow completing them. That one throw to Welker that just kind of hovered in the air for a while and was still caught was pathetic. I think the refs will keep Peyton in the game but Seattle wins in another ugly (beautiful) game.

    No shit. I don't think I've ever seen a QB get away with throwing so many horrible balls.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,315 Founders Club
    Denver Broncos
    Tequilla said:

    Noodle arm in the snow throwing ducks out there ... I agree with the Hawks winning rather easily ... say 34-17.

    In all seriousness, the Hawks defense can and should be able to put pressure with the front 4 and marginal blitzes - they've done so all season.

    Manning doesn't have the arm to be able to beat us down the field - particularly in what should be cold and probably windy conditions.

    I expect that we'll roll our Cover 3 up a bit and make it not only hard, but extremely punishing on the Denver WRs for their short routes.

    Denver's defense will probably be the worst that we've seen in well over a month. Beast should have a huge game and I expect that Wilson will make at least a handful of plays moving out of the pocket.

    Denver will get their yards, but they will make more mistakes than we will ... it's part of the Manning legend in big games.

    Why so dismissive of Manning and the Broncos defense?
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,938 Founders Club
    Denver Broncos
    chuck said:


    No shit. I don't think I've ever seen a QB get away with throwing so many horrible balls.

    Not since Major Applewhite in the Holiday Bowl. FUCK!
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,907
    Seattle Seahawks
    Anybody that has watched any number of Broncos games this year will realize that Manning doesn't have great arm strength anymore and that whatever he has left tends to go south in a hurry in cold weather. What he has left is the fact that he sees the game better than anybody else, is a tremendous field general, creates mismatches for his offense, and is able to anticipate throws better than anybody else.

    Against the Seahawks, he's going to have a number of problems. First, unlike most teams, we are able to matchup with the Denver WRs as well as have a reasonable option to cover the TE. There was a great article last week that explained why our defense is so good (http://grantland.com/features/whos-laughing-now/) in that it combines the best elements of zone and man defense. Since Manning can't push the ball down the field effectively, we'll probably be able to play more of a Cover 1 w/ both man and zone principals against Denver instead of a Cover 3 in order to take away Manning's preferred short throws and force him into testing his arm against the best secondary in football. Third, because we don't have to cheat to stopping the passing game, we will still be able to employ the numbers needed to slow down the Denver running game. Finally, the biggest challenge in Denver's passing game IMO is contending with their screen game ... which is often neutralized by defenses that have significant speed.

    Defensively, Denver's taken massive injury hits on the DL this season and good teams for the most part have been able to successfully run against them. Their secondary has been a massive failure most of the year and given our ability to run the ball straight downhill, I expect that we'll get more than a few opportunities to hit them deep in the game with play action passes. Moreover, without Von Miller, the Denver pass rush is really lacking in the edge passer department compared to most of the teams that we've played over the last month that have done a good job in containing Russell Wilson inside the pocket and limiting his ability to compromise defenses with his ability to scramble. I don't anticipate that Denver will be able to adequately contain Wilson.

    Seattle's defense is in my opinion often underrated given that they play things close to the vest to ensure that they don't make turnovers that compromise their defense. Special teams is a tremendous weapon for this team. Forcing any team to go the length of the field consistently against this defense will not be a winning formula. However, one consistency that this offense shows is the ability to make a handful of big plays during the game that often lead to scores. Where this offense gets dangerous is if the opposition isn't able to contain the Hawks in scoring off of 10+ play drives. We'll score a handful of points off of big plays. But if we can get 2-3 drives in the Super Bowl that are 10+ play drives, we'll get close to 30 points - which I'll take my chances with that and this defense.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,081 Swaye's Wigwam
    Seattle Seahawks
    Jesus Tequila.

    Cliff Notes version: Seattle's defense matches up well against Denver. Denver's defense is suspect, at least when you compare it to the last several Seahawk opponents.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,907
    Seattle Seahawks
    When people have pissed me off all weekend by basically saying "why" to the short responses, you get the long responses as a giant fuck you.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,636 Founders Club
    Seattle Seahawks
    Tequilla said:

    When people have pissed me off all weekend by basically saying "why" to the short responses, you get the long responses as a giant fuck you.

    That's the spirit
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,081 Swaye's Wigwam
    Seattle Seahawks
    Tequilla said:

    When people have pissed me off all weekend by basically saying "why" to the short responses, you get the long responses as a giant fuck you.

    I'm not sure it's really giant. Kind of medium if you ask me.
Sign In or Register to comment.