Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

=-~ Seahawks vs Cardinals TNF Game Thread ~-=

2»

Comments

  • biak1
    biak1 Member Posts: 4,237
    dnc said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    10-4 at worst after those games. Likely 4 W’s. Time to get the defense playing better and confident. Today and even last week were steps in the right direction.
    Get healthy, play some shit teams, have MOMENTUM for the playoffs, get Center ready to rumble and they might actually make some noise
    It's all about getting the one seed. Can't afford the annual inexplicable late season loss to a bad team.
    It’s a hallmark of Pete Carroll’s teams.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    biak1 said:

    dnc said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    10-4 at worst after those games. Likely 4 W’s. Time to get the defense playing better and confident. Today and even last week were steps in the right direction.
    Get healthy, play some shit teams, have MOMENTUM for the playoffs, get Center ready to rumble and they might actually make some noise
    It's all about getting the one seed. Can't afford the annual inexplicable late season loss to a bad team.
    It’s a hallmark of Pete Carroll’s teams.
    Yep.

    So is playing really well against good teams. They lost 3 out of 4 to good opponents and gave away their margin for error.

    Thankfully this season has been basically the antithesis of everything we expect from a Pete Carroll team so hopefully that includes not giving away one against a team they should beat easily.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,142 Swaye's Wigwam
    Too much movement for me to analyze plays and players and shit.

    Is snacks making a difference? He’s suited up two weeks in a row but no clue what his play count is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    Too much movement for me to analyze plays and players and shit.

    Is snacks making a difference? He’s suited up two weeks in a row but no clue what his play count is.

    The run defense was good before Snacks.

    The run defense has been good with Snacks.

    So sure.gif?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    dnc said:

    biak1 said:

    dnc said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    10-4 at worst after those games. Likely 4 W’s. Time to get the defense playing better and confident. Today and even last week were steps in the right direction.
    Get healthy, play some shit teams, have MOMENTUM for the playoffs, get Center ready to rumble and they might actually make some noise
    It's all about getting the one seed. Can't afford the annual inexplicable late season loss to a bad team.
    It’s a hallmark of Pete Carroll’s teams.
    Yep.

    So is playing really well against good teams. They lost 3 out of 4 to good opponents and gave away their margin for error.

    Thankfully this season has been basically the antithesis of everything we expect from a Pete Carroll team so hopefully that includes not giving away one against a team they should beat easily.
    The stat last night that they are 22-3 or something ridiculous in prime time was crazy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    Edwin_Bambino said:

    dnc said:

    biak1 said:

    dnc said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    10-4 at worst after those games. Likely 4 W’s. Time to get the defense playing better and confident. Today and even last week were steps in the right direction.
    Get healthy, play some shit teams, have MOMENTUM for the playoffs, get Center ready to rumble and they might actually make some noise
    It's all about getting the one seed. Can't afford the annual inexplicable late season loss to a bad team.
    It’s a hallmark of Pete Carroll’s teams.
    Yep.

    So is playing really well against good teams. They lost 3 out of 4 to good opponents and gave away their margin for error.

    Thankfully this season has been basically the antithesis of everything we expect from a Pete Carroll team so hopefully that includes not giving away one against a team they should beat easily.
    The stat last night that they are 22-3 or something ridiculous in prime time was crazy
    Yep. Pete generally shows up for big games, as does Russ.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    dnc said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    dnc said:

    biak1 said:

    dnc said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Gladstone said:

    10-4 at worst after those games. Likely 4 W’s. Time to get the defense playing better and confident. Today and even last week were steps in the right direction.
    Get healthy, play some shit teams, have MOMENTUM for the playoffs, get Center ready to rumble and they might actually make some noise
    It's all about getting the one seed. Can't afford the annual inexplicable late season loss to a bad team.
    It’s a hallmark of Pete Carroll’s teams.
    Yep.

    So is playing really well against good teams. They lost 3 out of 4 to good opponents and gave away their margin for error.

    Thankfully this season has been basically the antithesis of everything we expect from a Pete Carroll team so hopefully that includes not giving away one against a team they should beat easily.
    The stat last night that they are 22-3 or something ridiculous in prime time was crazy
    Yep. Pete generally shows up for big games, as does Russ.
    Would be neat if the Huskies showed up in big games, we will always have Stanford 2016, kill me
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    RaceBannon said:

    If they play defense they get homefield

    No quarterback can xan carry both sides of a team

    I sure hope so. The piped in crowd noise to the TV is always louder for Home games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,142 Swaye's Wigwam
    doogie said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If they play defense they get homefield

    No quarterback can xan carry both sides of a team

    I sure hope so. The piped in crowd noise to the TV is always louder for Home games.
    Still seemed to generate some false starts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,682 Standard Supporter
    They should be able to get to 12-4. I'm definitely not ready to jump on the Super Bowl bandwagon yet, but the defense at least was adequate Thurs. Most teams in the playoffs are good though, and an elite quarterback can slice through a sad secondary. You don't get to feast on the Beagles, Deadskins, and Jets. We'll see.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    you can feast on a bye week though. with the schedule as it is, HFA is absolutely the expectation now
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    Gladstone said:

    you can feast on a bye week though. with the schedule as it is, HFA is absolutely the expectation now

    Need a little bit of help from GB opponents but I agree. Their remaining schedule isn't tough but certainly tougher than ours. Hopefully the Colts come through Sunday.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter