Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Obama caught lying about Global Warming...

2»

Comments

  • death2ducksdeath2ducks Member Posts: 991

    Eh. We have some conservative professors, especially in the poli Sci and economics departments.

    Look up Murray Dry. I've taken a couple classes from him.

    Environmental science and other applied sciences are dominated by liberals.

    The thing you don't seem to realize is no one is a product of their professors. Smart people can see past perceived biases. Apparently you can't.

    image

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Eh. We have some conservative professors, especially in the poli Sci and economics departments.

    Look up Murray Dry. I've taken a couple classes from him.

    Environmental science and other applied sciences are dominated by liberals.

    The thing you don't seem to realize is no one is a product of their professors. Smart people can see past perceived biases. Apparently you can't.

    I guess that explains why you can't see past perceived biases.
  • Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
  • Eh. We have some conservative professors, especially in the poli Sci and economics departments.

    Look up Murray Dry. I've taken a couple classes from him.

    Environmental science and other applied sciences are dominated by liberals.

    The thing you don't seem to realize is no one is a product of their professors. Smart people can see past perceived biases. Apparently you can't.

    I guess that explains why you can't see past perceived biases.
    I judge you based on your views.

    Hth
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    In 100 years there will be an outpost on Mars, interstellar travel will be a reality, and global warming probably will not be an issue at all.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2014

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    You're the one that brought up gouging as an issue as a way to deflect the issue, not me. I was just asking if Exxon is entitled to an ROA that is in line with and in fact smaller than many other companies.
  • Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
    Including you.
  • Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
    Including you.
    In a fire, preferably.
  • uw2010uw2010 Member Posts: 940

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
    Including you.
    In a fire, preferably.
    Yea, but then the carbon emissions from your burning corpse would further accelerate global warming.
  • uw2010 said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
    Including you.
    In a fire, preferably.
    Yea, but then the carbon emissions from your burning corpse would further accelerate global warming.
    I'm carbon neutral
  • death2ducksdeath2ducks Member Posts: 991
    It's a good thing that the science is settled.

Sign In or Register to comment.