Nate Silver update
My prediction: Biden recovers, Nate Silver doesn't.
Don't think Joe is recovering quite honestly
Comments
-
What the fuck is an @iDawg?
-
And what the fuck is his new handle? Apparently phdfag is PassionDerekJohnson said:What the fuck is an @iDawg?
-
Irregardless of Biden's EC victory, Race plungered Nate and it wasn't even close. Polling is officially FUBAR in this country and you won't have @YellowSnow to kick around anymore on the issue. -
Media will continue to use polling to drive narrative. Cook it
-
2024: They learned from massive failures in 2016 and 2020 and REALLY have it correct this election. Harris leads by 17% in Wisconsin.doogie said:Media will continue to use polling to drive narrative. Cook it
-
Bad Orange Man claimed yesterday that the media used polling as a means to suppress his voters (i.e., dampen their enthusiasm) as well hurt his fundraising. He implied that they knew polling was bullshit and the he (Trump) had a great shot of winning the key swing states. Hence, the narrative about voter fraud on a massive scale because they feared he would actually win.
So does Trump think that the 2016 bogus polling was meant to hurt his support in that election? And if the "corrupt" media and Dems knew the 2016 polls were bullshit and it was, in fact, a much tighter race, why didn't they try harder to "steal" the race for HRC? -
I called the polls being skewed was to cover the cheating. Some time ago.doogie said:Media will continue to use polling to drive narrative. Cook it
-
My opinion only.YellowSnow said:Bad Orange Man claimed yesterday that the media used polling as a means to suppress his voters (i.e., dampen their enthusiasm) as well hurt his fundraising. He implied that they knew polling was bullshit and the he (Trump) had a great shot of winning the key swing states. Hence, the narrative about voter fraud on a massive scale because they feared he would actually win.
So does Trump think that the 2016 bogus polling was meant to hurt his support in that election? And if the "corrupt" media and Dems knew the 2016 polls were bullshit and it was, in fact, a much tighter race, why didn't they try harder to "steal" the race for HRC?
Polls were believed in 2016 and they thought it was a Clinton landslide until votes started coming in on Election Day. I mean, they spied on Trump and colluded with foreign sources to impact the election quite brazenly. They were caught flat-footed and started the Trump-Putin narrative that night to discredit the win. They went on the offense immediately to cover up heir spying and electioneering.
2020: They knew the polls were garbage, but needed them to make a Trump win seem impossible and illegitimate. Fraud machine was ready to go for late counts in every swing-state urban center. Knowing how many votes you need for late counts and there you go. The Dems couldn’t have Trump win on the off chance Barr indicted any of the Obama DOJ, or actually fully investigated Biden’s time as VP and afterward as found on Hunter’s laptop.
As Joe said himself on his voter fraud organization...
https://youtu.be/MA8a2g6tTp0 -
I've long doubted whether even Trump though he'd win in 2016.NorthwestFresh said:
My opinion only.YellowSnow said:Bad Orange Man claimed yesterday that the media used polling as a means to suppress his voters (i.e., dampen their enthusiasm) as well hurt his fundraising. He implied that they knew polling was bullshit and the he (Trump) had a great shot of winning the key swing states. Hence, the narrative about voter fraud on a massive scale because they feared he would actually win.
So does Trump think that the 2016 bogus polling was meant to hurt his support in that election? And if the "corrupt" media and Dems knew the 2016 polls were bullshit and it was, in fact, a much tighter race, why didn't they try harder to "steal" the race for HRC?
Polls were believed in 2016 and they thought it was a Clinton landslide until votes started coming in on Election Day. I mean, they spied on Trump and colluded with foreign sources to impact the election quite brazenly. They were caught flat-footed and started the Trump-Putin narrative that night to discredit the win. They went on the offense immediately to cover up heir spying and electioneering.
2020: They knew the polls were garbage, but needed them to make a Trump win seem impossible and illegitimate. Fraud machine was ready to go for late counts in every swing-state urban center. Knowing how many votes you need for late counts and there you go. The Dems couldn’t have Trump win on the off chance Barr indicted any of the Obama DOJ, or actually fully investigated Biden’s time as VP and afterward as found on Hunter’s laptop.
As Joe said himself on his voter fraud organization...https://youtu.be/MA8a2g6tTp0 -
I don't want to hear Trump bitch one bit about polling or press coverage. If that and that alone was the reason for losing, then there was no point in even running because everyone knew what that was going to be.YellowSnow said:Bad Orange Man claimed yesterday that the media used polling as a means to suppress his voters (i.e., dampen their enthusiasm) as well hurt his fundraising. He implied that they knew polling was bullshit and the he (Trump) had a great shot of winning the key swing states. Hence, the narrative about voter fraud on a massive scale because they feared he would actually win.
So does Trump think that the 2016 bogus polling was meant to hurt his support in that election? And if the "corrupt" media and Dems knew the 2016 polls were bullshit and it was, in fact, a much tighter race, why didn't they try harder to "steal" the race for HRC?
