Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is a pretty balanced look at climate change

1…910111214

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Houhusky said:

    The fact that the two fucktards with actual Geology degrees on this website haven't said anything in this thread speaks volumes ( @Mad_Son and myself)

    One of us has a fucking PhD and the other has worked on the single most "important" ice core when it comes to understanding the last 40,000 years of the Earth's Climate

    I haven't read a 1/4 of the stuff you wrote @CollegeDoog but pretending you are an expert in thermodynamics, geology, atmospheric science, Macro economics, micro economics, climate change, anthropological warming, solar power, politics, wind power, farming, and 15 other impossibly complicated things all while acting like they are simple might be hurting your cause here...

    But it has entertained me, so there's that

    I have a diverse set of skills.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,561 Founders Club
    My point doog is to let you run your tequila posts until its clear to all that you're spouting pure bullshit

    Obviously the problem is nowhere near as urgent as the left wants to make it so they can jack the price on oil even more and fuck with my lightbulbs.

    While we still can why not light yourself on fire?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,561 Founders Club
    CollegeDoog said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So where are the graphs and the science on the cost benefit of doing what to save what?

    I'm not playing. I'm just exposing you

    The only realistic option before doing irreparable harm to the Earth's climate is to move towards sustainable energy.


    We have been hearing about irreparable harm for years and years now. First it was by 2000, then 2008, then 2012 etc. why are the constantly and consistently changing these apocalyptic dates back? How come every glacier in the world hasn't melted as they predicted?
    Apocalypic predictions have always been 2050-2100 and beyond, so I don't know where you got that misinformation.

    The glaciers are melting. Sea ice in the Arctic is down 60%, North American glaciers are receding. That much is undeniable. It wasn't going to happen immediately though.

    You need to look at global warming as a greater trend, not an isolated sequence of years.

    Here's a good article from today on rising sea levels and the disappearing glaciers:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/14/science/earth/grappling-with-sea-level-rise-sooner-not-later.html?hp&_r=0
    He got that information from fucktardz like you before you were born. Hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RaceBannon said:

    All of a sudden collegedoog is too busy when we get to the heart of the matter. Nowhere in the volumes of shit he has posted is there any cost benefit analysis or any science on what we have to do when to get what result. For such a settled science that is so dialed in that is very strange.

    I guess we'll just buy some fucked up lightbulbs and put even more taxes on fuel and let it play out.

    Pathetic

    The thing you can't seem to comprehend is that there is no easy fix to this problem. We can't continue to rely on fossil fuels and we can't immediately cut off the head.

    You want me to give you an easy solution to the problem. The thing is I can't.

    I can disprove that the AGW skeptics are dumbfucks, however.
    So in other words, your settled science with all the answers can't provide the only answer that matters. So go ahead and shut the fuck up until it can. You haven't proved shit
    The science is settled.

    The solutions are in progress.

    Hth

    $1 Trillion on "Experiments" ? GO FUCK YOURSELF AND DIAFF!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    RaceBannon said:

    We just don't have any cost benefit analysis or idea what they are.

    YES WE DO!

    image

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    death2ducks said:

    RaceBannon said:

    We just don't have any cost benefit analysis or idea what they are.

    YES WE DO!

    image

    Why are oil, gas, and coal getting any subsidies?

    That chart was fucktarded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,561 Founders Club
    All industries get some kind of subsidy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    The solutions are in progress. We just don't have any cost benefit analysis or idea what they are. Too busy scaring the sheep. Have faith

    We know what the solutions are.

    They're just in the infancy of development.

    Renewables will become cheaper over time with more efficient technology.

    Thanks for playing!
    In 1979, I was interviewed by NBC News regarding the cost/benefit of Jimmy Carter's 25% federal tax credit PLUS Jerry Brown's 50% tax credit (CA) for WINDMILLS. My answer was, "History will decide." HOW MANY MORE FUCKING YEARS DOES IT TAKE TO DECIDE THAT THIS CRAP IS BULLSHIT?

    BTW, did you know that the Energy Department does NOT count hydo-electric as RENEWABLE? THEY DO THAT TO MAKE THEIR FUCKING NUMBERS LOOK BETTER AND TO KEEP SUBSIDIES AWAY FROM HYDRO-ELECTRIC!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    LOUD NOISES.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RaceBannon said:

    All industries get some kind of subsidy

    ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter