This is a pretty balanced look at climate change

death2ducks

Purple_Pills said:

CollegeDoog said:

There has been no change in solar activity significant enough to explain the recent warming of the planet.

Do I need to show pictures covering the basics?



Increased CO2 traps more infrared rays and thus traps more heat.

Hth

Recent warming? Temps are flat over the last 15 years and have only increased about a degree since 1880 despite the added CO2.

Increased water vapor traps more infrared rays and thus trap more heat. Amount of water vapor > amount of CO2 gas. Let's ban water!

Fucking idiots like you are just getting crooks like Al Gore rich.....

[Deleted User]

RaceBannon said:

RaceBannon said:

All of a sudden collegedoog is too busy when we get to the heart of the matter. Nowhere in the volumes of shit he has posted is there any cost benefit analysis or any science on what we have to do when to get what result. For such a settled science that is so dialed in that is very strange.

I guess we'll just buy some fucked up lightbulbs and put even more taxes on fuel and let it play out.

Pathetic

The thing you can't seem to comprehend is that there is no easy fix to this problem. We can't continue to rely on fossil fuels and we can't immediately cut off the head.

You want me to give you an easy solution to the problem. The thing is I can't.

I can disprove that the AGW skeptics are dumbfucks, however.

So in other words, your settled science with all the answers can't provide the only answer that matters. So go ahead and shut the fuck up until it can. You haven't proved shit

The science is settled.

The solutions are in progress.

Hth

death2ducks

This thread doesn't have enough charts. IS THIS THE "HOCKEY STICK CHART"?

allpurpleallgold

RaceBannon-So in other words, your settled science with all the answers can't provide the only answer that matters. So go ahead and shut the fuck up until it can. You haven't proved shit

You've entered creationist territory with that one.

CuntWaffle

I thought the solution was as easy as calling China and telling everyone else to just start burning wood chips daily?

RoadDawg55

Can we go back to talking x's and o's, critiquing whores, and bashing Kim?

unfrozencaveman

WTF is this nonsense?

Pollution is a negative externality - true. Market failure in theory

But if you're going to do an honest cost/benefit analysis, and your trump card is anthropological climate change, make sure to count the positive externalities as well

For example, my drunk brother in law is now able to grow all kinds of red wine grapes in N-Central WA. Just whites in decades past. This has grown his business exponentially. Count it

RaceBannon

allpurpleallgold said:

RaceBannon-So in other words, your settled science with all the answers can't provide the only answer that matters. So go ahead and shut the fuck up until it can. You haven't proved shit

You've entered creationist territory with that one.

The only one peddling faith here is collegedoog.

[Deleted User]

When Purple Pills stops peddling misleading half truths like,

"The Sun is solely responsible for heating the Earth,"

"CO2 isn't the most important greenhouse gas,"

Or

"Averages for the last 15 years are constant,"

He can have a seat at the big boy table.

Until then, c'est la vie.

RaceBannon

The solutions are in progress. We just don't have any cost benefit analysis or idea what they are. Too busy scaring the sheep. Have faith