Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

3 named sources have all now gone on the record calling you a lying dipshit IC

1…1012141516

Comments

  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    So we should believe a media that has been caught in lie after lie? Your admonishment rings hollow.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,570 Standard Supporter
    I saw zero confirmation in the articles concerning the original claim. None. And what she is "affirming" is also highly suspect.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Doogles said:

    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    False. It makes no sense.

    Just like in your mind Trump said All mexican immigrants are rapists. Headline reads, "Trump Calls Mexicans Rapists and Murders". But that's not what he said, at all.

    Trump cares about the USA military deeply. I know this because of his actions. How he's helped the VA, his unflinching demand of respect for the flag and monuments. His belief in American exceptionalism. Decades on the record calling America the greatest country with the greatest people and greatest soldiers.
    He has no core beliefs. But that’s beside the point. If you’re telling me that you think the story is more likely false than true, I think you’re more likely lying than telling the truth.

    An honest answer would be, “I wouldn’t change my vote even if he admitted to saying those vile, unpatriotic things.”
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    So we should believe a media that has been caught in lie after lie? Your admonishment rings hollow.
    “Media” as a monolith is your excuse? What will it be when someone does go on the record?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Sledog said:

    I saw zero confirmation in the articles concerning the original claim. None. And what she is "affirming" is also highly suspect.

    You deny believing her?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,570 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    So we should believe a media that has been caught in lie after lie? Your admonishment rings hollow.
    “Media” as a monolith is your excuse? What will it be when someone does go on the record?
    You'd think they'd be front and center at this point.

    You swallowed the whole Ukraine phone call, whistle blower, Vindman sham like a 5 dollar ho!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    So we should believe a media that has been caught in lie after lie? Your admonishment rings hollow.
    “Media” as a monolith is your excuse? What will it be when someone does go on the record?
    You'd think they'd be front and center at this point.

    You swallowed the whole Ukraine phone call, whistle blower, Vindman sham like a 5 dollar ho!

    The “sham” that a majority of the US Senate agreed had been proven?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    So we should believe a media that has been caught in lie after lie? Your admonishment rings hollow.
    “Media” as a monolith is your excuse? What will it be when someone does go on the record?
    If Trump did half the things he’s been accused of we’d have a smoking gun. We don’t. Instead it’s always unnamed sources. I need evidence, not accusations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    There isn’t even one among you who wouldn’t bet the proposition that the story is true if forced to choose. Your lies are all for show.

    So we should believe a media that has been caught in lie after lie? Your admonishment rings hollow.
    “Media” as a monolith is your excuse? What will it be when someone does go on the record?
    If Trump did half the things he’s been accused of we’d have a smoking gun. We don’t. Instead it’s always unnamed sources. I need evidence, not accusations.
    He’s done most of the things he’s been accused of. Your demands for proof beyond any metaphysical doubt is noted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited September 2020
    Evidence like a video press conference of VP Biden openly interfering with a foreign fraud investigation of his unqualified cocaine addicted son for a Board slot on an energy company?

    or evidence like a coordinated hit piece from a compromised enemy sighting “unnamed sources” as confirmed?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter