Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Still no word on addressing root cause
MikeDamone
Member Posts: 37,781
in Tug Tavern
No mention of men being fathers to their kids, no mention the importance of education, no word on staying off drugs and not dealing drugs. No mention of not beating women or drinking and driving.
Everything is "societies" fault and no one needs to take any personal responsibility.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/bs-sp-ravens-training-camp-practice-20200827-tr3ggj7zafgmhe7o2xvh6xw7oy-story.html?outputType=amp
Everything is "societies" fault and no one needs to take any personal responsibility.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/bs-sp-ravens-training-camp-practice-20200827-tr3ggj7zafgmhe7o2xvh6xw7oy-story.html?outputType=amp
Comments
-
By bringing these things up, you must come from a life of privilege.
-
-
This will anger liberals. Data and rational thought are serious triggers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k9F8I_-HL0&frags=pl%2Cwn -
greenblood said:
By bringing these things up, you must come from a life of privilege.
If the root cause was addressed things would be remarkably better in a generation. But there is no money in that and it difficult. It's easier to yell about things in the ether and keep reiterating the same victimhood talking points while waiting for people of other races to fix their problems.BleachedAnusDawg said:
-
I kind of feel like a sucker for getting married looking at those stats. I was given an ultimatum though.
-
No one has asked me how I'm responsible for black illegitimacy and the lack of a nuclear family with an actual working father and what I'm supposed to do about it.
-
400 years of chattel slavery, white oppression and Trump are to blame for that. Another one of the questions you can't ask is why did black women used to have a higher rate of marriage than did white women prior to the mid-1960s?WestlinnDuck said:No one has asked me how I'm responsible for black illegitimacy and the lack of a nuclear family with an actual working father and what I'm supposed to do about it.
Jacob Blake's six kids, all born out of wedlock none of whom he supports financially were all born due to white racism. -
Someone in the 1960s said that he would have blacks voting for dems for the next 100 years. Pretty sure it was Goldwater.
-
Well. The USA was "founded" on racist ideas. No one can name one. But still.
https://www.wgmd.com/titans-ryan-tannehill-us-was-founded-upon-racist-ideas/
-
Lol. ClassicWestlinnDuck said:Someone in the 1960s said that he would have blacks voting for dems for the next 100 years. Pretty sure it was Goldwater.
-
The blacks were only 3/5 human, you fucking racist!!!!MikeDamone said:Well. The USA was "founded" on racist ideas. No one can name one. But still.
https://www.wgmd.com/titans-ryan-tannehill-us-was-founded-upon-racist-ideas/ -
JFC when people bring that up I want to slap them.SFGbob said:
The blacks were only 3/5 human, you fucking racist!!!! -
It's a great way to ID a fucking parrot who doesn't know what the fuck they are talking about. Slave holding states would have loved to have counted you as fully human you fucking idiots.MikeDamone said:
JFC when people bring that up I want to slap them. -
And it had nothing to do with "black people". Race isn't mentioned in the 3/5 compromise. That's why free black people in northern states were counted as 1.SFGbob said:
It's a great way to ID a fucking parrot who doesn't know what the fuck they are talking about. Slave holding states would have loved to have counted you as fully human you fucking idiots. -
the difference is the white women don't have 6 kids with 5 different baby daddies as wellBleachedAnusDawg said: -
Some do. And their outcomes are as horrible as other races who do the same.Goduckies said:
the difference is the white women don't have 6 kids with 5 different baby daddies as well -
When WWLM, White Women Lives Matter, becomes a thing they will be addressed
-
Correct, but since most slaves were black it really kind of goes without saying.MikeDamone said:
And it had nothing to do with "black people". Race isn't mentioned in the 3/5 compromise. That's why free black people in northern states were counted as 1. -
yes, some do, but not the majority.MikeDamone said:
Some do. And their outcomes are as horrible as other races who do the same. -
Some do, the difference is that a white person who did this would been seen as bad person by the overwhelming majority of all other white people. They would be stigmatized by almost all of their peers and rejected in their community.Goduckies said:
the difference is the white women don't have 6 kids with 5 different baby daddies as well
Does anyone believe that the Dazzler encouraged his daughters to have kids out of wedlock? Hell do you think the Obama's encourage their kids to have babies before they were married? Of course not, the question answers itself, but white liberals and black leftists would rather put their own eyes out before condemning this behavior in the black community. -
Yep, this doesn’t just solve some issues, it solves all issues. For every color of skin, and every statistic of crime. It’s not an issue, it’s the issue. And while it is more prominent in certain cultures at the moment, basically all cultures have this problem outside of Jews, Asians, and some groups like Mormons. Our world would be a paradise if we incentivized people to not have kids until they were capable of supporting them in the correct way. I’d be fine paying young people 25k a year to not have kids.MikeDamone said:No mention of men being fathers to their kids, no mention the importance of education, no word on staying off drugs and not dealing drugs. No mention of not beating women or drinking and driving.
Everything is "societies" fault and no one needs to take any personal responsibility.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/bs-sp-ravens-training-camp-practice-20200827-tr3ggj7zafgmhe7o2xvh6xw7oy-story.html?outputType=amp -
Preach brother, you are singing the tune I've been humming for 30 years. Out of wedlock births are the engine that drives almost all of our social problems.CH0Pwarlord said:
Yep, this doesn’t just solve some issues, it solves all issues. For every color of skin, and every statistic of crime. It’s not an issue, it’s the issue. And while it is more prominent in certain cultures at the moment, basically all cultures have this problem outside of Jews, Asians, and some groups like Mormons. Our world would be a paradise if we incentivized people to not have kids until they were capable of supporting them in the correct way. I’d be fine paying young people 25k a year to not have kids. -
Bastards...SFGbob said:
Preach brother, you are singing the tune I've been humming for 30 years. Out of wedlock births are the engine that drives almost all of our social problems. -
Anyone ever think about why historically societies placed such a large stigma on people that had kids out of wedlock? Were they are just a bunch of prudes and blue noses or was there maybe a social reason why discouraging out of wedlock births was seen as good for the society as a whole?CH0Pwarlord said:
Yep, this doesn’t just solve some issues, it solves all issues. For every color of skin, and every statistic of crime. It’s not an issue, it’s the issue. And while it is more prominent in certain cultures at the moment, basically all cultures have this problem outside of Jews, Asians, and some groups like Mormons. Our world would be a paradise if we incentivized people to not have kids until they were capable of supporting them in the correct way. I’d be fine paying young people 25k a year to not have kids. -
The majority of no group has five or six kids by different dads.Goduckies said:
yes, some do, but not the majority. -
There are definitely places in white communities where your statement is false. The rate runs about 25% for whites. They are not rejected by their community. Out of wedlock birth rates are rising faster than for blacks.SFGbob said:
Some do, the difference is that a white person who did this would been seen as bad person by the overwhelming majority of all other white people. They would be stigmatized by almost all of their peers and rejected in their community.
Does anyone believe that the Dazzler encouraged his daughters to have kids out of wedlock? Hell do you think the Obama's encourage their kids to have babies before they were married? Of course not, the question answers itself, but white liberals and black leftists would rather put their own eyes out before condemning this behavior in the black community.
https://whyy.org/articles/rate-of-births-to-white-single-moms-accelerates/ -
Personally don’t care wether the couple is married, boyfriend and girlfriend, partners, gay, trans, whatever....as long as they can come together and give the child they made the appropriate support so that kid doesn’t grow up resentful, neglected, and with anger towards them/society. Basically any kid that is loved and taken care of, gets through school, becomes independent, and finds things to do to earn money and contribute to society. Then there is incentive to only do drugs on weekends. And to not steal and assault people. Many marriages are churning out neglected shitty little kids who grow up to be shitty adults. We just need people not to have kids until they are financially and emotionally ready to dedicated their life to a kid.SFGbob said:
Anyone ever think about why historically societies placed such a large stigma on people that had kids out of wedlock? Were they are just a bunch of prudes and blue noses or was there maybe a social reason why discouraging out of wedlock births was seen as good for the society as a whole?
-
Out of wedlock births for whites is around 30%. Having 5 kids out of wedlock by 3 difference dads will definitely get you shunned by most white communities. Having a single kid out of wedlock will not.MikeDamone said:
There are definitely places in white communities where your statement is false. The rate runs about 25% for whites. They are not rejected by their community. -
I agree, they don't have to be married but it's a little tougher to walk out on your wife than it is to walk out on your girl friend. And of course there are people who are married that have no problem producing shitty kids. Some kids are also just bad and it doesn't really matter what kind of home environment they are raised in. We've all seen the family with the 3 kids two of which end up going to college and having successful lives and the 3rd ends up being a drug addicted dirt bag.CH0Pwarlord said:
Personally don’t care wether the couple is married, boyfriend and girlfriend, partners, gay, trans, whatever....as long as they can come together and give the child they made the appropriate support so that kid doesn’t grow up resentful, neglected, and with anger towards them/society. Basically any kid that is loved and taken care of, gets through school, becomes independent, and finds things to do to earn money and contribute to society. Then there is incentive to only do drugs on weekends. And to not steal and assault people. Many marriages are churning out neglected shitty little kids who grow up to be shitty adults. We just need people not to have kids until they are financially and emotionally ready to dedicated their life to a kid. -
Divorces are initiated by women though
