Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Final Senate IC report

2

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,508 Founders Club
    The lineup of anti Trump witnesses over the years may be the least impressive in history
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,373
    SFGbob said:

    From the documents produced by Cohen, the Committee became concerned that
    multiple witnesses and/or their counsel could have been involved in or aware of Cohen's attempt
    to mislead the Committee. Indeed, at least two witnesses (Donald Trump Jr. and Felix Sater)
    could have known that Cohen's statement falsely represented material facts about negotiations
    over a. deal for a Trump Tower Moscow.


    The crack legal mind of the Dazzler has him this time.

    A notably flurry of activity
    immediately preceded Cohen's submission of his August written statement, and an additional
    burst of communications surrounded his October 25, 2017 testimony.
    Based on the names of
    counsel identified in the log, membership in the alleged JDA appeared to include, at least,
    Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr.; the Trump Organization, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Paul
    Manafort, the Trump Campaign, Keith Schiller, Hope Hicks, Michael Flynn, and Felix Sater.
    However, the Committee was provided with no competent evidence to substantiate the JDA's ·
    existence by Ryan or anyone else.

    (U) Due to time and resource considerations, the Committee opted not to further pursue
    its inquiry into potentially obstructive conduct under this alleged JDA umbrella. Doing so would
    have likely required initiating litigation over subpoena compliance, a process that may not have
    resolved in time to be of investigative value.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,944

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Damning
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,373
    SFGbob said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Damning
    When you allege a non-existent joint defense agreement in stone walling an investigation, even Republican Senators take note of the volume of material you are trying to conceal.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited August 2020

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.” FFS the FBI raided Cohen’s office and home, so much for attorney-client privilege, seized all documents and electronics, and STILL found nothing on Trump they could use which means the “flurry of activity” didn’t implicate anyone else, and especially Trump.. Then they squeezed Cohen, who had nothing to offer against Trump, so they indict him for tax evasion and campaign finance for the Stormy payoff, none leading to Trump, and locked him up with a guilty plea.

    Biden’s America.

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus. My opinion of you is actually somewhat lower after this thread. You’re in a trio with those other two morons.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,373

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Privilege log.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,373

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    Not sure you knew this, but Burr is no fan of Trump, Krusty. Now go pick up @insinceredawg and @MontlakeBridgeTroll in your Clown Car.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,944
    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    Containing some members that were part of the attempted coup.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,401 Swaye's Wigwam
    So much pressing.


  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,508 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    what party?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,373

    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    what party?
    Daddy's.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,373
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    Containing some members that were part of the attempted coup.
    That doesn't explain how the report was adopted by the committee, but you know that.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,508 Founders Club
    So he's impeached?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,944
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    Containing some members that were part of the attempted coup.
    That doesn't explain how the report was adopted by the committee, but you know that.
    No, the Tweet from Kim Strassel that I posted earlier that you didn't read explained how the report was adopted.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    Containing some members that were part of the attempted coup.
    Burr was against Trump winning in 2016.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/where-republicans-stand-on-donald-trump-a-cheat-sheet/481449/
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    Containing some members that were part of the attempted coup.
    That doesn't explain how the report was adopted by the committee, but you know that.
    No, the Tweet from Kim Strassel that I posted earlier that you didn't read explained how the report was adopted.
    He didn’t even read his original copy/paste. He’s a big-time attorney though. Rich, too. All big-time west. Last lawyers fly commercial to red states during a pandemic and then drive hours to The Ozarks to make the big deals with rednecks.
Sign In or Register to comment.