Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

White Hispanic Zimmerman Files Civil Suit Against Black Lives Matter

2»

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler completely swallowed the lie about Zimmerman and Trademark not being in a fight prior to the shooting, totally bought the lie that Trademark never laid a hand on Zimmerman and that Zimmerman didn't have a broken nose. But, the "coon" narrative was just a bridge too far for the Dazzler.

    I don't now where this stuff comes from. But I'm sure BobbyBoy will at some point say I said it or agree with it, which is false, of course.

    BobbyBoy's accuracy drops precipitously after he loses his shit from being challenged on anything.

    All one needs to do is read the transcripts from the trial, as I have, and ignore Bob's insane rants and false accusations, to know what evidence exists.

    Have a nice day, BobbyBoy.

    Is that were you learned that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark? Is that where you learned that Zimmerman provoked a "reaction" but not a fight? Btw, what was the "reaction" that Zimmerman "provoked" Kunt? And please make sure you quote from those transcripts you read.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Careful, you're going to trigger Turdbomber. Did you know that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark, provoked the fight and was told by the police not to follow Trademark?

    Never said that. You're lying again, Bobby.

    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    No reason to lie about the facts, BobbyBoy. But I know your BP is over 200 already and your keyboard keys are suffering a terrific pounding.

    Easy BobbyBoy. Easy.
    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    Oh I see, Zimmerman "provoked the reaction" from Trademark which was to attack Zimmerman but not the "fight."

    Love the Kunt logic. If you "provoke" someone to punch you in the face, you didn't provoke a "fight" you just provoked a "reaction."

    You taking logic lessons from the Dazzler Kunt?

    Fuck off.
    Are you really this fucking thick, BobbyBoy?

    No need to answer. I already know.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Careful, you're going to trigger Turdbomber. Did you know that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark, provoked the fight and was told by the police not to follow Trademark?

    Never said that. You're lying again, Bobby.

    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    No reason to lie about the facts, BobbyBoy. But I know your BP is over 200 already and your keyboard keys are suffering a terrific pounding.

    Easy BobbyBoy. Easy.
    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    Oh I see, Zimmerman "provoked the reaction" from Trademark which was to attack Zimmerman but not the "fight."

    Love the Kunt logic. If you "provoke" someone to punch you in the face, you didn't provoke a "fight" you just provoked a "reaction."

    You taking logic lessons from the Dazzler Kunt?

    Fuck off.
    Are you really this fucking thick, BobbyBoy?

    No need to answer. I already know.
    Was the question too tough for ya Turd? What was the "reaction" that Zimmerman provoked Kunt?
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler completely swallowed the lie about Zimmerman and Trademark not being in a fight prior to the shooting, totally bought the lie that Trademark never laid a hand on Zimmerman and that Zimmerman didn't have a broken nose. But, the "coon" narrative was just a bridge too far for the Dazzler.

    I don't now where this stuff comes from. But I'm sure BobbyBoy will at some point say I said it or agree with it, which is false, of course.

    BobbyBoy's accuracy drops precipitously after he loses his shit from being challenged on anything.

    All one needs to do is read the transcripts from the trial, as I have, and ignore Bob's insane rants and false accusations, to know what evidence exists.

    Have a nice day, BobbyBoy.
    Is that were you learned that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark? Is that where you learned that Zimmerman provoked a "reaction" but not a fight? Btw, what was the "reaction" that Zimmerman "provoked" Kunt? And please make sure you quote from those transcripts you read.
    Why are you so vested in these cases, BobbyBoy? Are you the sole shareholder of Zimmerman, Inc., or something? It's your Religion.

    So, you're good with any of your sons being followed by strange, slow-driving, armed hispanic men on a dark, rainy evening through your neighborhood? Nothing strange, alarming or provocative about that at all, is there, BobbyBoy?
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Careful, you're going to trigger Turdbomber. Did you know that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark, provoked the fight and was told by the police not to follow Trademark?

    Never said that. You're lying again, Bobby.

    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    No reason to lie about the facts, BobbyBoy. But I know your BP is over 200 already and your keyboard keys are suffering a terrific pounding.

    Easy BobbyBoy. Easy.
    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    Oh I see, Zimmerman "provoked the reaction" from Trademark which was to attack Zimmerman but not the "fight."

    Love the Kunt logic. If you "provoke" someone to punch you in the face, you didn't provoke a "fight" you just provoked a "reaction."

    You taking logic lessons from the Dazzler Kunt?

    Fuck off.
    Are you really this fucking thick, BobbyBoy?

    No need to answer. I already know.
    Was the question too tough for ya Turd? What was the "reaction" that Zimmerman provoked Kunt?
    Fear. Uncertainty. Anxiety. Hostility. Anger. Defensiveness. Retaliation.

    Completely abnormal in your world, I know. And I'm sure only bad black kids would react that way.

    BTW: Do I need to define "reaction" for you, too? I feel like that question is coming, too.
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,226 Standard Supporter
    HH is the guy who awkwardly hangs out by the tennis courts at Husky Stadium on game day because no one wants to talk with him at the tailgate he received a pity invite to.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler completely swallowed the lie about Zimmerman and Trademark not being in a fight prior to the shooting, totally bought the lie that Trademark never laid a hand on Zimmerman and that Zimmerman didn't have a broken nose. But, the "coon" narrative was just a bridge too far for the Dazzler.

    I don't now where this stuff comes from. But I'm sure BobbyBoy will at some point say I said it or agree with it, which is false, of course.

    BobbyBoy's accuracy drops precipitously after he loses his shit from being challenged on anything.

    All one needs to do is read the transcripts from the trial, as I have, and ignore Bob's insane rants and false accusations, to know what evidence exists.

    Have a nice day, BobbyBoy.
    Is that were you learned that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark? Is that where you learned that Zimmerman provoked a "reaction" but not a fight? Btw, what was the "reaction" that Zimmerman "provoked" Kunt? And please make sure you quote from those transcripts you read.
    Why are you so vested in these cases, BobbyBoy? Are you the sole shareholder of Zimmerman, Inc., or something? It's your Religion.

    So, you're good with any of your sons being followed by strange, slow-driving, armed hispanic men on a dark, rainy evening through your neighborhood? Nothing strange, alarming or provocative about that at all, is there, BobbyBoy?
    Weird the way you dodged the question Kunt. Your claims about reading the transcript and dealing in facts are pure bullshit. I'm invested in truth and the facts and you're completely full of shit. Why are you so invested in this case that you feel the need to lie and make pathetic assertions about Zimmerman provoking a "reaction" but not provoking a "fight?"

    Dance Kunt, dance!!!

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Careful, you're going to trigger Turdbomber. Did you know that Zimmerman "stalked" Trademark, provoked the fight and was told by the police not to follow Trademark?

    Never said that. You're lying again, Bobby.

    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    No reason to lie about the facts, BobbyBoy. But I know your BP is over 200 already and your keyboard keys are suffering a terrific pounding.

    Easy BobbyBoy. Easy.
    I said he provoked the reaction, and Trayvon owned his bad choices after that.

    Oh I see, Zimmerman "provoked the reaction" from Trademark which was to attack Zimmerman but not the "fight."

    Love the Kunt logic. If you "provoke" someone to punch you in the face, you didn't provoke a "fight" you just provoked a "reaction."

    You taking logic lessons from the Dazzler Kunt?

    Fuck off.
    Are you really this fucking thick, BobbyBoy?

    No need to answer. I already know.
    Was the question too tough for ya Turd? What was the "reaction" that Zimmerman provoked Kunt?
    Fear. Uncertainty. Anxiety. Hostility. Anger. Defensiveness. Retaliation.

    Completely abnormal in your world, I know. And I'm sure only bad black kids would react that way.

    BTW: Do I need to define "reaction" for you, too? I feel like that question is coming, too.
    The dance of the Kunt continues.
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    Zimmerman is a Civil Rights activist?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    Stupid though it was, @SFGbob, I answered your question, with what, 1,2,3....7 Answers by my count.

    And you still haven't absorbed them yet. Okay.

    How long ago was your massive head contusion?