So I get Tulsi's beef with the bully that is the @dnc, but what exactly does the RNC offer her? She doesn't exactly align with Trump or the broader GOP.
So unless she's made a radical change in the last year and no longer believes what she's spent her political career working towards, it's hard to not see this as a move of pure opportunism.
Tulsi is toast as a national dem. If the dems wanted a "moderate" then Tulsi is the closest thing they have. She probably might get a gig in the second Trump administration.
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I want so bad to like Yang but the 2nd Amendment man....
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I want so bad to like Yang but the 2nd Amendment man....
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I want so bad to like Yang but the 2nd Amendment man....
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I want so bad to like Yang but the 2nd Amendment man....
Research further...
He's got some other weird shit too.
I couldn't get further on his site. When I see massive gun laws I just stop reading and think "welp, another otherwise interesting candidate who hates personal freedom." Next.
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I want so bad to like Yang but the 2nd Amendment man....
Research further...
He's got some other weird shit too.
I couldn't get further on his site. When I see massive gun laws I just stop reading and think "welp, another otherwise interesting candidate who hates personal freedom." Next.
I’m not big into politics, but at the debates, Yang stuck out as being a reasonable, smart guy on stage with all the other delusional, lying idiots.
Yang is intriguing as well. For me, he's also hampered by problematic civil rights positions, and that his key differentiator—UBI—would only get through Congress as an addition-to, instead of replacement-of, existing safety net programs.
I want so bad to like Yang but the 2nd Amendment man....
Research further...
He's got some other weird shit too.
If we're bashing weird shit with whip cream, I'm out.
Kasich for Gabbard is the Herschel Walker trade of 2020 politics for the GOP is it’s true.
I'm well on record as being AllTulsiAllGabbard, but this isn't a good move for her imo.
Her values don't really align with the administration except on foreign policy. She did already turn down a position w the current administration early on.
Kasich for Gabbard is the Herschel Walker trade of 2020 politics for the GOP is it’s true.
I'm well on record as being AllTulsiAllGabbard, but this isn't a good move for her imo.
Her values don't really align with the administration except on foreign policy. She did already turn down a position w the current administration early on.
That's the problem with her, many of her values do align with an increasingly Marxist DNC. Not calling her a Marxist so don't twist. I like her but I despise the DNC and see it for what it is. If she can't, then I can't trust her.
Comments
So unless she's made a radical change in the last year and no longer believes what she's spent her political career working towards, it's hard to not see this as a move of pure opportunism.
Trump broke it and now its where Tulsi or Yang can actually have a shot
If Tulsi isn't a socialist what does she have in common with the democrats?
She wants prison and justice reform. Biden Harris? Not bloody likely
brb, jo.
He's got some other weird shit too.
Her values don't really align with the administration except on foreign policy. She did already turn down a position w the current administration early on.
Also, please to be distinguishing between her positions and her two dad's.