She's using their numbers. @HHusky was all in on the 2-3 million dead at the time himself. Until he realized Trump must have stopped it. Then crickets and back to Trump has blood on his hands for reasons that are hard to actually articulate
I said 100,000, ma'am. I was a bloody optimist!
Imagine being such a failure at life that you can argue a point for 2 months, get emphatically destroyed, and this is where you want to spend your free time.
Destroyed doesn't mean what it used to apparently. Alternative facts?
Imagine being so stupid you thought that statement was directed at you
She's using their numbers. @HHusky was all in on the 2-3 million dead at the time himself. Until he realized Trump must have stopped it. Then crickets and back to Trump has blood on his hands for reasons that are hard to actually articulate
I said 100,000, ma'am. I was a bloody optimist!
Imagine being such a failure at life that you can argue a point for 2 months, get emphatically destroyed, and this is where you want to spend your free time.
Destroyed doesn't mean what it used to apparently. Alternative facts?
Imagine being so stupid you thought that statement was directed at you
She's using their numbers. @HHusky was all in on the 2-3 million dead at the time himself. Until he realized Trump must have stopped it. Then crickets and back to Trump has blood on his hands for reasons that are hard to actually articulate
I said 100,000, ma'am. I was a bloody optimist!
Until foochie said two million
Daddy said 2 million. Fauci said 200,000. He was also a bloody optimist.
In the April 16 White House briefing, President Trump again said, as he often has before, that “models predicted between 1.5 and 2.2 million deaths” if we had not endured the various economic shutdowns imposed by the Governors of 42 States. The severity and breadth of those statewide shutdowns was initially encouraged, and is now justified, by just one dramatic statistic. That number was the 2.2 million U.S. deaths supposedly at risk from COVID-19.
The famed 2.2 million estimate first reached viral status in the March 31 White House briefing by Doctors Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx. They displayed a graph with two bell‐shaped epidemic curves placed on top of each other. Both curves estimate deaths per day which rise to a peak and then fall.
Two Curves The steeper of the two curves was painted black and marked “Pandemic Outbreak: No Interventions.” It showed an estimated total of 1.5 to 2.2 million deaths from COVID-19 in what appears to be a relatively short period. The White House graph showed no dates, but the source of that now‐famous 2.2 million estimate (as explained later) predicted U.S. deaths would keep rising until June 20.
Comments
https://cato.org/blog/did-mitigation-save-two-million-lives
In the April 16 White House briefing, President Trump again said, as he often has before, that “models predicted between 1.5 and 2.2 million deaths” if we had not endured the various economic shutdowns imposed by the Governors of 42 States. The severity and breadth of those statewide shutdowns was initially encouraged, and is now justified, by just one dramatic statistic. That number was the 2.2 million U.S. deaths supposedly at risk from COVID-19.
The famed 2.2 million estimate first reached viral status in the March 31 White House briefing by Doctors Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx. They displayed a graph with two bell‐shaped epidemic curves placed on top of each other. Both curves estimate deaths per day which rise to a peak and then fall.
Two Curves
The steeper of the two curves was painted black and marked “Pandemic Outbreak: No Interventions.” It showed an estimated total of 1.5 to 2.2 million deaths from COVID-19 in what appears to be a relatively short period. The White House graph showed no dates, but the source of that now‐famous 2.2 million estimate (as explained later) predicted U.S. deaths would keep rising until June 20.
For a couple weeks
Or 5 months or until the election