This boomer has been voting by mail for years. Its not hard. I do it early and often
An app would be the easiest to rig. Mail, like in person voting depends on the honesty and integrity of the people in charge of the counting
For democrats to cry about Trump calling them out is a bit hollow after Florida 2000 and the selection not election of Bush. They still call it illegitimate and Hillary still doesn't accept that she lost in 16 preferring to blame Russia and out the country through the Mueller show trial
Do you vote under both your screen-name and real name?
When my mom went to memory care we rented her place and then we moved to California and forwarded the address. I got my California ballot and my Washington ballot and my mom's Washington ballot.
Incompetence is just as likely as fraud. And I did in fact vote only once because I am classy like that
This boomer has been voting by mail for years. Its not hard. I do it early and often
An app would be the easiest to rig. Mail, like in person voting depends on the honesty and integrity of the people in charge of the counting
For democrats to cry about Trump calling them out is a bit hollow after Florida 2000 and the selection not election of Bush. They still call it illegitimate and Hillary still doesn't accept that she lost in 16 preferring to blame Russia and out the country through the Mueller show trial
This boomer has been voting by mail for years. Its not hard. I do it early and often
An app would be the easiest to rig. Mail, like in person voting depends on the honesty and integrity of the people in charge of the counting
For democrats to cry about Trump calling them out is a bit hollow after Florida 2000 and the selection not election of Bush. They still call it illegitimate and Hillary still doesn't accept that she lost in 16 preferring to blame Russia and out the country through the Mueller show trial
Do you vote under both your screen-name and real name?
Ive spent the past 6 months hearing that the constitution and rights are only applicable when people’s lives are NOT in danger.
If it’s saves one life.
No one wants to delay the election but the GRIM reality might be that we have to.
I’m hearing it’s only going to be two weeks anyway.
god this is disingenuous as fuck.
It's a little hyperbole, but no one in power wanted to talk about the abrogation of civil rights by executive emergency orders until the Floyd protests. One might agree with the ends, but not addressing the means is disingenuous as fuck.
Karen's are driving this, they are just useful idiots. They vote for the people who want to break this country. Like BLM, you think that Inslee gives a sh*t about old people dying for a cause? You think the dazzler gives a sh*t?
You should read that piece @dhdawg . I suspect you're on the same team with the writer on most things, excepting perhaps civil rights.
I read it and agree with Taibbi on the overwhelming majority of issues, and I think any liberal who wants to give social media companies more power to censor speech they don't like (unless it's something outrageous like directly targeting people) is ultimately making a deal with the devil.
Drastic actions were necessary, and in March people were just looking for leaders who they felt they could trust to make the right decisions. A lot of latitude was given to everyone (including Trump at the beginning) which is why the lockdowns and the governors who imposed strict lockdowns, were widely popular.
Half the voters under 35 have never written a check. You expect them to mark a ballot and find a UPS mailbox?!?!
35 and under need an app to do anything.
Pay someone? Venmo.
Buy a house? Zillow.
Deposit a check? Direct deposit or bank app.
Turn off your lights? Alexa.
Get groceries? Amazon.
Eat? Grubhub, etc.
We've the boomers who want to go to a polling place, the Gen Xers who want to vote by mail, and the punks who want to vote via app or internet. It's hard.
I’m a GenX but I identify as Boomer. Please respect my feelings.
You should read that piece @dhdawg . I suspect you're on the same team with the writer on most things, excepting perhaps civil rights.
I read it and agree with Taibbi on the overwhelming majority of issues, and I think any liberal who wants to give social media companies more power to censor speech they don't like (unless it's something outrageous like directly targeting people) is ultimately making a deal with the devil.
Drastic actions were necessary, and in March people were just looking for leaders who they felt they could trust to make the right decisions. A lot of latitude was given to everyone (including Trump at the beginning) which is why the lockdowns and the governors who imposed strict lockdowns, were widely popular.
Did we read the same article? It was a Tabaiaiaiaibibibibbiibib twat but the article was by someone else, and it discussed much more than social media.
Your arguments are essentially the same in favor of the Patriot Act.
Comments
Incompetence is just as likely as fraud. And I did in fact vote only once because I am classy like that
Drastic actions were necessary, and in March people were just looking for leaders who they felt they could trust to make the right decisions. A lot of latitude was given to everyone (including Trump at the beginning) which is why the lockdowns and the governors who imposed strict lockdowns, were widely popular.
Your arguments are essentially the same in favor of the Patriot Act.
Do you?
I suppose you do now
Is there a peer reviewed double blind study I’m unaware of?