How many votes change over a Roger Stone pardon?

SFGbob

Zero.

The people who are going to be OUTRAGED over this already hate Trump and everyone knows their OUTRAGE is phony anyway.

PostGameOrangeSlices

This is it. They finally, finally stopped Drumpff

WestlinnDuck

The people who are outraged are either ignorant or lying and have no interest in honest justice.

PostGameOrangeSlices

WestlinnDuck said:

The people who are outraged are either ignorant or lying and have no interest in honest justice.

Or just your typical left wing fascist

PurpleThrobber

Today - zero.

When Susan Rosenberg becomes a household name - tens of thousands.

Goduckies

SFGbob said:

Zero.

The people who are going to be OUTRAGED over this already hate Trump and everyone knows their OUTRAGE is phony anyway.

Exactly

Swaye

PurpleThrobber said:

Today - zero.

When Susan Rosenberg becomes a household name - tens of thousands.

We already know the NFL players hate her.

Pitchfork51

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

This is it. They finally, finally stopped Drumpff

Walls = closing in

NorthwestFresh

It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

SFGbob

NorthwestFresh said:

It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.

NorthwestFresh

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.

It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.

SFGbob

NorthwestFresh said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.

It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.

They have been criminalizing political differences since the 1980s. They got a little taste of their own medicine during the Clinton years.

NorthwestFresh

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.

It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.

They have been criminalizing political differences since the 1980s. They got a little taste of their own medicine during the Clinton years.

There were actually convictions directly related to Whitewater, though. The Valerie Plame Hoax and the Russian Collusion Hoax resulted in zero convictions related to what was supposed to be investigated. Patrick Fitzgerald knew from the beginning that Richard Armitage was the “leaker” to Novak but continued the investigation to harm Dubya Bush and find at least one process crime.

SFGbob

NorthwestFresh said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.

It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.

They have been criminalizing political differences since the 1980s. They got a little taste of their own medicine during the Clinton years.

There were actually convictions directly related to Whitewater, though. The Valerie Plame Hoax and the Russian Collusion Hoax resulted in zero convictions related to what was supposed to be investigated. Patrick Fitzgerald knew from the beginning that Richard Armitage was the “leaker” to Novak but continued the investigation to harm Dubya Bush and find at least one process crime.

They nailed the sitting Gov. of Arkansas.

NorthwestFresh

Which is more likely?

(A) Pelosi doesn’t know the difference between a commutation and a pardon, or

(B) she knows the difference but her idiotic supporters don’t the difference and pardon sounds more nefarious?

Tough call.

https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1281758698214391808?s=21

NorthwestFresh

All the Rosenstein crew speaking out today about Trump commuting the sentence of Roger Stone.

But but but it wasn’t a partisan investigation at all. None of these guys will face any consequences for their lies and corruption. Barr and Durham are cleaning up the mess for their DOJ pals.