Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How many votes change over a Roger Stone pardon?

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
Zero.

The people who are going to be OUTRAGED over this already hate Trump and everyone knows their OUTRAGE is phony anyway.

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217
    This is it. They finally, finally stopped Drumpff
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,644 Standard Supporter
    The people who are outraged are either ignorant or lying and have no interest in honest justice.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217

    The people who are outraged are either ignorant or lying and have no interest in honest justice.

    Or just your typical left wing fascist
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,136 Standard Supporter
    Today - zero.

    When Susan Rosenberg becomes a household name - tens of thousands.

  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,001 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Zero.

    The people who are going to be OUTRAGED over this already hate Trump and everyone knows their OUTRAGE is phony anyway.

    Exactly
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    This is it. They finally, finally stopped Drumpff

    Walls = closing in
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

    It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited July 2020
    SFGbob said:

    It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

    It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.
    It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

    Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

    It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.
    It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

    Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.
    They have been criminalizing political differences since the 1980s. They got a little taste of their own medicine during the Clinton years.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

    It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.
    It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

    Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.
    They have been criminalizing political differences since the 1980s. They got a little taste of their own medicine during the Clinton years.
    There were actually convictions directly related to Whitewater, though. The Valerie Plame Hoax and the Russian Collusion Hoax resulted in zero convictions related to what was supposed to be investigated. Patrick Fitzgerald knew from the beginning that Richard Armitage was the “leaker” to Novak but continued the investigation to harm Dubya Bush and find at least one process crime.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    It’s not even a full pardon. Sentence was commuted but the conviction still stands. I thought libs wanted non-violent offenders out of prisons? First conviction of Stone’s life at age 67 shouldn’t mean prison time if you’re at all objective, which the judge and jury clearly were not.

    It allows Stone to appeal the conviction without having to sit in jail while doing so.
    It’s the very definition of using the courts to manufacture crimes against political opponents. Very communistic in how the Left has changed the judiciary into a political weapon. Dig and interview to create process crimes with the money of the government and support of The News to demonize the target as the accused bleeds out financially and either takes a plea or just gives up.

    Half the country supports these tactics that are straight out of the USSR.
    They have been criminalizing political differences since the 1980s. They got a little taste of their own medicine during the Clinton years.
    There were actually convictions directly related to Whitewater, though. The Valerie Plame Hoax and the Russian Collusion Hoax resulted in zero convictions related to what was supposed to be investigated. Patrick Fitzgerald knew from the beginning that Richard Armitage was the “leaker” to Novak but continued the investigation to harm Dubya Bush and find at least one process crime.
    They nailed the sitting Gov. of Arkansas.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Which is more likely?

    (A) Pelosi doesn’t know the difference between a commutation and a pardon, or

    (B) she knows the difference but her idiotic supporters don’t the difference and pardon sounds more nefarious?

    Tough call.




  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    All the Rosenstein crew speaking out today about Trump commuting the sentence of Roger Stone.

    But but but it wasn’t a partisan investigation at all. None of these guys will face any consequences for their lies and corruption. Barr and Durham are cleaning up the mess for their DOJ pals.