Huskies Land 3 Star Running Back Out Of Texas

DerekJohnson

https://uwdawgpound.com/2020/7/2/21311196/woof-huskies-land-3-star-running-back-out-of-texas-uw-washington-football-recruiting

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Thanks Taft.

ntxduck

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

1to392831weretaken

ntxduck said:

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

Can't tell if serious or Ballz.

dnc

1to392831weretaken said:

ntxduck said:

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

Can't tell if serious or Ballz.

Has to be be Ballz

haie

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

chuck

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

ntxduck

dnc said:

1to392831weretaken said:

ntxduck said:

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

Can't tell if serious or Ballz.

Has to be be Ballz

Lol. Actually 100% serious. Lufkin has serious fball history.

backthepack

ntxduck said:

dnc said:

1to392831weretaken said:

ntxduck said:

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

Can't tell if serious or Ballz.

Has to be be Ballz

Lol. Actually 100% serious. Lufkin has serious fball history.

Yeah he doesn’t suck. He’s huge and has legit top end speed

haie

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

MontlakeBridgeTroll

He reminds me of Levine Coleman all rolled into one.

Edwin_Bambino

haie said:

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

I know you thrive on hot takes but that is incredibly hot and incredibly wrong

RoadDawg55

Edwin_Bambino said:

haie said:

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

I know you thrive on hot takes but that is incredibly hot and incredibly wrong

Coleman was killing it in 2016. There were times I was yelling for the coaches to put Coleman in. It’s not that outrageous.

HairyBallsDawg

backthepack said:

ntxduck said:

dnc said:

1to392831weretaken said:

ntxduck said:

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

Can't tell if serious or Ballz.

Has to be be Ballz

Lol. Actually 100% serious. Lufkin has serious fball history.

Yeah he doesn’t suck. He’s huge and has legit top end speed

Could this be Lake's way of saying Washington is going to be known from this day forward as a school that uses mainly 6'+ running backs?

Thinks could be worse.

Bring me some Corey Dillon.

1to392831weretaken

HairyBallsDawg said:

backthepack said:

ntxduck said:

dnc said:

1to392831weretaken said:

ntxduck said:

Really good high school program. A 3* from Lufkin with those offers id take in a heartbeat over any 4* from The non-CA Pac12 states

Can't tell if serious or Ballz.

Has to be be Ballz

Lol. Actually 100% serious. Lufkin has serious fball history.

Yeah he doesn’t suck. He’s huge and has legit top end speed

Could this be Lake's way of saying Washington is going to be known from this day forward as a school that uses mainly 6'+ running backs?

Thinks could be worse.

Bring me some Corey Dillon.

Yeah, if there's one thing Washington doesn't need in its new pro-style, air-raid, aggressive, four-H-back offense, it's Chris Polk, Bishop Sankey, Myles Gaskin, or Napoleon Kaufman.

Jesus TFC.

1to392831weretaken

RoadDawg55 said:

Edwin_Bambino said:

haie said:

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

I know you thrive on hot takes but that is incredibly hot and incredibly wrong

Coleman was killing it in 2016. There were times I was yelling for the coaches to put Coleman in. It’s not that outrageous.

The Huskies lose to Arizona and don't make the playoffs without Coleman in 2016, but we're still talking about sitting your school's all-time leading rusher behind him. Wanting Coleman to get more carries in 2016 while watching in 2016 is defensible. With the benefit of hindsight, though, wishing Gaskin were second string to anybody on the roster in the Petersen era is asinine.

chuck

haie said:

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

I always found Coleman too inconsistent. He was amazing at times, with quickness, vision and power. Other times he was hesitant, slow and indecisive, and didnt break tackles. I think he was a good platoon back that you could give a few carries to see how he looked on a given day. If he looked good you could ride him. If he didn't then he needed a quick hook.

RoadDawg55

1to392831weretaken said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Edwin_Bambino said:

haie said:

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

I know you thrive on hot takes but that is incredibly hot and incredibly wrong

Coleman was killing it in 2016. There were times I was yelling for the coaches to put Coleman in. It’s not that outrageous.

The Huskies lose to Arizona and don't make the playoffs without Coleman in 2016, but we're still talking about sitting your school's all-time leading rusher behind him. Wanting Coleman to get more carries in 2016 while watching in 2016 is defensible. With the benefit of hindsight, though, wishing Gaskin were second string to anybody on the roster in the Petersen era is asinine.

There were games he was our best back. That’s nothing against Gaskin, but if you switched them, we would have gotten the same results. Our OL and Dissly/Sample were destroying everyone but Alabama and USC.

Kingdome_Urinals

chuck said:

haie said:

chuck said:

haie said:

He looks like a pretty good piece in the mold of Lavon Coleman.

Except faster. He's quite fast for his size. I think he could be useful. It doesnt change the obvious, which is that boner is at least as inept as Gregory as a recruiter. This guy could have been a good late addition to fill an opening on the roster, but he appears to be the feature RB in the class and he's simply not qualified to be that at a school expecting to be in the national conversation.

Coleman should have been the 2017 feature back.

I always found Coleman too inconsistent. He was amazing at times, with quickness, vision and power. Other times he was hesitant, slow and indecisive, and didnt break tackles. I think he was a good platoon back that you could give a few carries to see how he looked on a given day. If he looked good you could ride him. If he didn't then he needed a quick hook.

Agree. Coleman got tripped up at the LOS too often. He was not a short yardage guy, they depended on Myles for that because of his better balance and instincts. Despite his size he was not really a power back.

Coleman disappeared against top level competition. Gaskin did not. Watch the Penn St, Fiesta Bowl, tell me you would rather have Coleman out there over Gaskin. No way. Myles is the only reason we were in that game.

Many examples like that. Gaskin also had far better value as a pass catcher.

Watch the Rose Bowl vs. tOSU. Tell me Coleman would do what Gaskin did. He wouldn't.