Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Chris Wallace gets it
RaceBannon
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,486 
in Tug Tavern
Not a magatard by any stretch
https://foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-twitter-third-party-2020-election
"The danger in that is, once you go down that slope, unless you're going to fact-check everything everybody says -- and Lord knows, are there things the president says that aren't true? Yes," Wallace said. "Are there things that Joe Biden says and Democrats say that aren't true? Yes. So if you're going to fact check the president, are you going to fact check Joe Biden? If you're going to fact check, you know, some Republican congressman, are you going to fact check a Democratic congressman? And so it becomes a very dangerous thing."
"[If] you don't fact check everybody, then people are going to see bias," Wallace went on, adding that Twitter was running the risk of "becoming a third party in the ring" during a contentious election year and "may regret it."
"I'm in the truth business," Wallace said later in the podcast, "and I'd be perfectly happy if everything politicians said is fact-checked and everything I say is fact-checked. That's fine.
"But you can't do it. You just can't. And there's always going to be some bias in what you decide is so false, that needs to be fact-checked. And that just lends itself to the argument that there's political bias, political favoritism in what you call out and what you don't."
This transcends who is in the White House at the time. Obama loved to use FAUX News as a punching bag. Hillary had the vast right wing conspiracy. Everybody does it POTD
https://foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-twitter-third-party-2020-election
"The danger in that is, once you go down that slope, unless you're going to fact-check everything everybody says -- and Lord knows, are there things the president says that aren't true? Yes," Wallace said. "Are there things that Joe Biden says and Democrats say that aren't true? Yes. So if you're going to fact check the president, are you going to fact check Joe Biden? If you're going to fact check, you know, some Republican congressman, are you going to fact check a Democratic congressman? And so it becomes a very dangerous thing."
"[If] you don't fact check everybody, then people are going to see bias," Wallace went on, adding that Twitter was running the risk of "becoming a third party in the ring" during a contentious election year and "may regret it."
"I'm in the truth business," Wallace said later in the podcast, "and I'd be perfectly happy if everything politicians said is fact-checked and everything I say is fact-checked. That's fine.
"But you can't do it. You just can't. And there's always going to be some bias in what you decide is so false, that needs to be fact-checked. And that just lends itself to the argument that there's political bias, political favoritism in what you call out and what you don't."
This transcends who is in the White House at the time. Obama loved to use FAUX News as a punching bag. Hillary had the vast right wing conspiracy. Everybody does it POTD
Comments
Tweets will be found calling for violent protest that aren't flagged. Sideshow will continue
There's no fucking way they want to start fact checking authoritarian regimes.
If not, The Throbber assumes Jack DorseyFS will also be censoring AOC's bullshit, too.
"You look tired, Twitter. You wearing out. You ain't gonna make it, Twitter." - For 5 rounds, till Twitter falls & can't get up.