More reporting on the fact that there is no concrete evidence showing Russia hacked the DNC

SFGbob

Or as I like to call it, what's it like being a fucking lying hack Dazzler?

CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html

RaceBannon

Brennan supposedly will be revealed to have hidden evidence that Putin wanted Hillary


The main problem with Russia collusion from day 1 was anyone with half a brain knew that

doogie

So what?

The economy is closed. Maybe not ‘your’ economy for the time being but it’s really the only thing that matters.

Pitchfork51

Who needs evidence? Trump dances to Putin's tune obvs

Bendintheriver

Pitchfork51 said:

Who needs evidence? Trump dances to Putin's tune obvs

This is how the mind of a rat works. We have proof from amateur open mic night that BO sucked putin dick. We know that The Bitch and the dem party colluded with Russia to dream up a completely false dossier on Trump. Yet lying libs claim it is Trump who is in putins back pocket.

If it wasn't such a pathetic and obvious attempt at lying by rats it would be funny.

HHusky

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Swaye

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.

HHusky

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.

Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

Swaye

HHusky said:

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.

Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.

There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.

Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?

HHusky

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.

Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.

There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.

Relieved

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.

Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?

Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?

doogie

DNC email talking points alert

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.

Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?

Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?

The fact that Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything these days is compelling for me.

I can't prove it's not a Deep State conspiracy though, so you got that going for you.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.

Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?

Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?

The fact that Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything these days is compelling for me.

I can't prove it's not a Deep State conspiracy though, so you got that going for you.

So your proof of Russia hacking is what?

Because the guys that did the investigation say they didn't.

You've been wrong or lying since day 1 on this. Why stop now?

You've been wrong on everything. You're house of cards is continuing to collapse before our eyes as we see the Obama team trampling the constitution to get to Trump.

Fuck off

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.

Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?

That's a good cocksucker, believe whatever you betters tell you is true. Explains why you swallowed like a bitch the whole Trump Russian collusion story. I don't believe Russia, I believe evidence and so far the best your side has is "trust us"

SFGbob

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.

Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.

But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.

We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.

Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?

Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?

The fact that Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything these days is compelling for me.

I can't prove it's not a Deep State conspiracy though, so you got that going for you.

So your proof of Russia hacking is what?

Because the guys that did the investigation say they didn't.

You've been wrong or lying since day 1 on this. Why stop now?

You've been wrong on everything. You're house of cards is continuing to collapse before our eyes as we see the Obama team trampling the constitution to get to Trump.

Fuck off

He has been wrong on everything, but this time is he is going to get it right.

SFGbob

Like a child, Dazzler believes whatever his mommy and daddy tell him, even after his mommy and daddy have been caught lying to him about the Dossier, Russian collusion, the Trump Tower meeting, General Flynn, Carter Page, Papadopoulos. But this time, despite any evidence to the contrary, and directly counter to the Crowdstrike CEO's sworn testimony that the has no concrete evidence that the Russians were behind the hack, this time Dazzler knows they are telling him the truth.

Pitchfork51

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.

Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.

There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.

I've watched some really wild porn lately that may offend sensibilities.

PurpleThrobber

Pitchfork51 said:

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

Swaye said:

HHusky said:

You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?

You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.

Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.

There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.

I've watched some really wild porn lately that may offend sensibilities.

No such thing.