Kim is not good at hiding his agenda
Comments
-
cliff notes?
-
What has Kim done other than front dawgman some money? Samek started the site and needed some backing so Kim gave him some dough and now he's the fucking taken the whole thing over and ran it into the ground. What's Samek's deal in the first place? Does he take it in the ass from Kim or did he sell his ownership to Kim? Hopefully the latter because I didnt' think he was that much of a pussy.
-
Don't forget Chip Kelley at Oregon. He was always an asshole to the media and didn't give a fuck.
Kim is enamored with shiny objects. If he knew anything about coaching (which he doesn't) most coaches aren't sucking up to a 5' skinny jeans wearing wannabe photographer. Adults are in charge now. To compare him to willingham is silly. Unless he's not recruiting and golfing instead, which he isn't. It will be nice to have a coach who is working on winning rather than tweeting and trying to hit the god damn cross bar from the 40. -
I was never given a fair shot at doogman. I registered as "richie suxon" or something like that, made two posts and blammo. Fucking nazis
-
It doesn't work that way.Tequilla said:Only bringing out the long poasts when needed to shoot down the idea that the flash isn't what builds programs and wins at a high level.
-
This.MikeDamone said:Don't forget Chip Kelley at Oregon. He was always an asshole to the media and didn't give a fuck.
Kim is enamored with shiny objects. If he knew anything about coaching (which he doesn't) most coaches aren't sucking up to a 5' skinny jeans wearing wannabe photographer. Adults are in charge now. To compare him to willingham is silly. Unless he's not recruiting and golfing instead, which he isn't. It will be nice to have a coach who is working on winning rather than tweeting and trying to hit the god damn cross bar from the 40.
The doogmen are so used to getting dickrides from Sark that they just assume that Petersen, who doesn't give dickrides, is the same as Willingham, who was just a dick. They're too stupid to know the difference. -
Tequila, your thoughts about stars in football are really fucking stupid. Alabama has a team full of stars. USC with Carroll were full of stars. Sure, you will have a few skill guys upset about not getting the ball enough, but who gives a fuck? I have no idea how you came up with that shit, and I am now dumber for having read it.
-
All I'm trying to say is that having a bunch of elite players is only great if the elite players do their job. What makes the USC's and Alabama's successful is that when they are competing for titles, they are getting everybody to buy in to the success of the good of the team.
Has Sark ever done that at Washington?
Do you think he'll do that at SC all of a sudden?
Does Petersen have a track record of this?
Yes, in an ideal world you take the best players you can and have play with the team first concept.
But you don't have to have a ridiculous number of elite talent guys to win at a high level. You need a lot of very good players combined with a handful of elite players. -
So you're saying it's the coaching?Tequilla said:All I'm trying to say is that having a bunch of elite players is only great if the elite players do their job. What makes the USC's and Alabama's successful is that when they are competing for titles, they are getting everybody to buy in to the success of the good of the team.
Has Sark ever done that at Washington?
Do you think he'll do that at SC all of a sudden?
Does Petersen have a track record of this?
Yes, in an ideal world you take the best players you can and have play with the team first concept.
But you don't have to have a ridiculous number of elite talent guys to win at a high level. You need a lot of very good players combined with a handful of elite players. -
DJ's early 90s teams were full of a lot of what would now be four and five stars.
-
Harv'd that for yaFire_Marshall_Bill said:DJ's early 90s teams were full of a lot of what would now be four and five star roids.
-
I think Sark will have great success at USC and for certain we'll play him down the road for a pac12 title.
Here's where Peterman is going to make us happy as our coach. Pete will out coach Sark 9 out of 10 times. Even with better players, which Sark will have at SC as he gets his feet on the ground (Sark is going to recruit top 3 classes, every year), Peterlips will beat him though, possibly with regularity.. Can't wait!,
Dumbass fuckers like Kim, and a lot of newbies here, don't realize what an unbelievable 'gameday' coach Peterman is. Just watch the Georgia game a few years back, or the bsu/Oklahoma tilt. Those aren't flukes. Best gameday coach in the country, his teams have contingency plans for every situation, and they execute them flawlessly. The 'hook-n-ladder' Pete ran to tie Oklahoma was a thing of beauty. Cant believe how prepared Pete had BSU in that game. Never seen anything like it. Sark cant even execute back-to-back series in any one game.
People who understand football, like me, get how important the hire of Peter was. How getting rid of Sark saved this program. Sark getting hired away was the best thing to happen to this program since Rick got hired (and fired at the perfect time...The AD (barbara) just butchered the successors). Most of you chimps don't get it. You just follow Kimberly and Ektard, two guys who know zip about the game. Stay around This place, you'll learn a few things. -
Winning 2 BCS bowls (at Boise Fucking State) is "winning at a BCS level," isn't it?Tequilla said:That he hasn't won at a BCS level?
-
No doubt about it.WilburHooksHands said:
Winning 2 BCS bowls (at Boise Fucking State) is "winning at a BCS level," isn't it?Tequilla said:That he hasn't won at a BCS level?
No question that Petersen's not going to come to Washington and win at a 90% clip ...
But he dominated at the level that he coached at.
And while I do think that Boise had some luck w/ some of their big BCS level wins, a large part of luck is putting yourself in a position to be able to take advantage of favorable situations.
-
I like the way you talk. (You most likely know it as Myanmar, but it will always be Burma to me.)puppylove_sugarsteel said:I think Sark will have great success at USC and for certain we'll play him down the road for a pac12 title.
Here's where Peterman is going to make us happy as our coach. Pete will out coach Sark 9 out of 10 times. Even with better players, which Sark will have at SC as he gets his feet on the ground (Sark is going to recruit top 3 classes, every year), Peterlips will beat him though, possibly with regularity.. Can't wait!,
Dumbass fuckers like Kim, and a lot of newbies here, don't realize what an unbelievable 'gameday' coach Peterman is. Just watch the Georgia game a few years back, or the bsu/Oklahoma tilt. Those aren't flukes. Best gameday coach in the country, his teams have contingency plans for every situation, and they execute them flawlessly. The 'hook-n-ladder' Pete ran to tie Oklahoma was a thing of beauty. Cant believe how prepared Pete had BSU in that game. Never seen anything like it. Sark cant even execute back-to-back series in any one game.
People who understand football, like me, get how important the hire of Peter was. How getting rid of Sark saved this program. Sark getting hired away was the best thing to happen to this program since Rick got hired (and fired at the perfect time...The AD (barbara) just butchered the successors). Most of you chimps don't get it. You just follow Kimberly and Ektard, two guys who know zip about the game. Stay around This place, you'll learn a few things.
-
Didn't Peterman host Family Feud for a while?
-
If you are going to bash on Petersen that's fine but if you bash on Peterman then I'm out!
-
I like bragging how I understand football while in the same post saying Sark will have great success at USC and will play for a Pac-12 title. I'm PLSSFS like that.puppylove_sugarsteel said:I think Sark will have great success at USC and for certain we'll play him down the road for a pac12 title.
People who understand football, like me, get how important the hire of Peter was. Most of you chimps don't get it. You just follow Kimberly and Ektard, two guys who know zip about the game. Stay around This place, you'll learn a few things.
-
since it sure sounds like Kim can't get over his boyfriend Sark's departure and is going insane even by his own standards... he should just move to L.A. and start a USC fan site for his business. What, with all of his insider access and close ties to he coaches, he's certain to thrive in that as well.
-
If you can't see that is part of what makes Puppy Steel a great poster, I can't help you.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I like bragging how I understand football while in the same post saying Sark will have great success at USC and will play for a Pac-12 title. I'm PLSSFS like that.puppylove_sugarsteel said:I think Sark will have great success at USC and for certain we'll play him down the road for a pac12 title.
People who understand football, like me, get how important the hire of Peter was. Most of you chimps don't get it. You just follow Kimberly and Ektard, two guys who know zip about the game. Stay around This place, you'll learn a few things.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
