If we win tomorrow... prepare for idiots
Comments
-
ktardishstelling you right now. If by the grace of Jack Lockner we beat BYU tomorrow, prepare for Doogs all over the place to be claiming that we should have just hired Tui as our head coach!!!11!!!!!
"Look at how hard they are playing for Tui"
"You can tell how much fun they are having with Tui as the HC"
"They love Tui"
"Would Tui have kept the old staff.... TOSH?!?!?!"
"This is a 10 win team with Tui next year"
"Why didn't we give Tui a shot, he BLEEDS purple and gold!!!!!11!!!!"
"Tui is clearly a leader
Shut the Fuck up Pepsi. Nobody thinks Tui should be the head coach, regardless of outcome. That's just silly and you're being a toyd! -
You give the doogs way too much credit, implying that they wouldn't be idiots if we lost.
So if we win it will be interesting, if we lose that will be interesting as well. Either way doogs gonna doog. -
loadsock said:
20__ willbeaspecialseason is on deck to be the the newest member of doogman.
Kennywheatonsgonnascore still >>>>>20__willbeaspecialseason -
A strong foundation? He left some talent and I won't argue that poont...but he left a fucking mess. Penalties, lack of fundamentals and discipline, soft players used to a flag football mentality.TTJ said:Sark did leave a strong foundation. The O-line and safety depth are shit, but that's not insurmountable. The overall talent level is very high. And expectations for the CP regime should be too. From day one.
Oh but he did leave the legacy of the lawn mower so there is that. Christ it's gonna take Pete all spring and fall work outs to weed that shit out of the team's system. A fucking disgrace imo. I actually almost feel sorry for Trojan fans right now. -
Just when I think they are going to see the light, the doogs find new ways to surprise me.CuntWaffle said:You give the doogs way too much credit, implying that they wouldn't be idiots if we lost.
So if we win it will be interesting, if we lose that will be interesting as well. Either way doogs gonna doog. -
I don't think we disagree much here. Sark's teams underachieved. The ceiling with these players should be much higher than 8 or 9 wins.Haid_D_Salaami said:A strong foundation? He left some talent and I won't argue that poont...but he left a fucking mess. Penalties, lack of fundamentals and discipline, soft players used to a flag football mentality.
Oh but he did leave the legacy of the lawn mower so there is that. Christ it's gonna take Pete all spring and fall work outs to weed that shit out of the team's system. A fucking disgrace imo. I actually almost feel sorry for Trojan fans right now.
Changing a team's mentality doesn't have to take a long time. (Wasn't this the HHB thesis of the past 5 years?) RN had faults, but he had JL's downtrodden players "buying in" in year one and winning Roses in year two. I was never a big fan of SS, but I recognize he improved the morale and effort of TW's players in his first year as well.
If CP is the right guy, the results on the scoreboard should start getting better right away. With the (disgracefully) watered down schedule, I actually think the table is set for CP's Huskies to challenge for a Rose Bowl berth in 2014. -
WHEN we win tomorrow
You're not a real fan -
you just want UW to lose so Kim can be right
-
We already know when Petersen wins next year it will be credited to Sark. Just like idiots out there like PLSS credit Rick's Rose Bowl win to Lambo.
-
Not this guy. I never credited JL for RN's roses, and I won't credit SS for CP's.He_Needs_More_Time said:We already know when Petersen wins next year it will be credited to Sark. Just like idiots out there like PLSS credit Rick's Rose Bowl win to Lambo.
Coaching > Recruiting






