Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ektard's Thesis is Complete

2

Comments

  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,387
    Realdawg has this program dialed in.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,860 Swaye's Wigwam
    That was a chuckle. He said he was only providing the "concrete stuff", implying that the less concrete stuff was going to be even juicier. I read the entire thing and never ran into anything concrete at all. Just rumors and a tidbit of hyperbole from Sirmon.

    Perhaps the concrete stuff is coming in part deux.

    Yaledawg pointed out that there was mention of a single line player in the whole report (McGary). It's also worth mentioning that Ecklund's "concrete" info on him was that he never doubted Sark would easily pull him in spite of all the available information pointing toward him leaning elsewhere.

    Very revelatory and worthy of all the ball gargling he earned.
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    chuck said:

    That was a chuckle. He said he was only providing the "concrete stuff", implying that the less concrete stuff was going to be even juicier. I read the entire thing and never ran into anything concrete at all. Just rumors and a tidbit of hyperbole from Sirmon.

    Perhaps the concrete stuff is coming in part deux.

    Yaledawg pointed out that there was mention of a single line player in the whole report (McGary). It's also worth mentioning that Ecklund's "concrete" info on him was that he never doubted Sark would easily pull him in spite of all the available information pointing toward him leaning elsewhere.

    Very revelatory and worthy of all the ball gargling he earned.

    Premium. Content.

  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    The allegiance to insider access oozes from all the recent post censorship and blog updates.

    Tick, tock..
  • MrsMora
    MrsMora Member Posts: 60

    When Eklund asks Sirmon "how is recruiting going" what the fuck does he expect Sirmon to say? Of course he is going to say it is going great. It's the same thing with Kim when he asked Tosh about recruiting to USC. It would only cause problems if he told the truth and said yes.

    This is why Fleenor, Kim, Fetters, and Eklund are so fucking clueless. They have access to the coaches, but the coaches always lie to them, but these guys report anything they say as fact. It's all because they are dying to be insiders, but it's never going to happen.

    Exactly the coaches treat dm.c like their mouthpiece and just spout shit out hoping it sticks on a wall somewhere (for whatever reason, to improve perception of the program or support their job security... etc.).

    I'm also starting to wonder if Ektard actually knows the meaning of the word 'fact'.

    Stay tuned for parts 2 and 3 of the thesis.... we will get his expert analysis of where recruiting is going in the future. Shit's about to get cray cray.

    On another note, some fucktard asked Phil Bleenor today what his opinion of the possibility of Jonathan Smith being the OC was... like Bleenor knows anything about coaching football?
  • SandyHooker
    SandyHooker Member Posts: 343
    tracker said:

    MrsMora said:

    Guys some of this is 2nd and 3rd had info but his sources are amazing, so it is totally not speculation and all about FACTS.

    And amazingly these guys that never talk about UW or mention them in their top schools are just lying and are going to shock da world!

    Ektard has the facts and you can't dispute them. Now go suck his dick for providing you with amazing info.

    People just don't understand the "Double Secret Verbal" process.

    81%.

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,270
    All skill guys and very little concrete OL/DL info ...

    Lots of 3-star type guys ... which is what Petersen is going to most likely pull in anyway.

    The only one that I'll concede is that we "might" have had a shot at Mixon w/ the Sark staff ... but whatever on that. While great RBs are great, they are dependent upon a good OL.

    Bottom line is that Sark's still never won more than 5 games in conference and he still devalues the importance of line play.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    The day after Christmas is ruined