Lionel Hutz @HHusky isn’t a criminal attorney. He did work comp cases and profited on his clients’ misery. He’s admitted his legal career in one of his many meltdowns on The Woodshed.
Lionel Hutz @HHusky isn’t a criminal attorney. He did work comp cases and profited on his clients’ misery. He’s admitted his legal career in one of his many meltdowns on The Woodshed.
I believe HH is a respected legal source in dog licensing.
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call more attention to his lack of credibility.
“A federal judge.” Funny you don’t poont out who that judge is, but we know why. Van Gack dropped the charges and recused himself from all cases. Totally understandable when you believe you’re doing the right thing. He’s fucked.
You used to try harder, Lionel. You’ve lost your mediocre fastball, your change-up isn’t Moyer-level, your location is imprecise, so you’re serving up taters on a platter these days. We both know why you still post though.
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Pure gibberish
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Pure gibberish
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Pure gibberish
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Pure gibberish
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call more attention to his lack of credibility.
“A federal judge.” Funny you don’t poont out who that judge is, but we know why. Van Gack dropped the charges and recused himself from all cases. Totally understandable when you believe you’re doing the right thing. He’s fucked.
You used to try harder, Lionel. You’ve lost your mediocre fastball, your change-up isn’t Moyer-level, your location is imprecise, so you’re serving up taters on a platter these days. We both know why you still post though.
Boredom? I missed your response in the other thread I asked about the old educk days. What was your handle and is that fool Snotty69 still around here? How about Rambo?
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Pure gibberish
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020
Pathetic
Compelling argument
You've had a chance to read the documents. They were everything Barr claimed and more. Maybe you can point out where he lied. I guess shopping cart accident law has different standards.
Show us where the bad Orange man and Mean AG touched you on this doll!
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.
You know the Dazzler has a strong case when he is attacking Barr’s physical appearance. You’ll notice that he no longer even touches his lie about there being no prosecutorial misconduct.
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.
You know the Dazzler has a strong case when he is attacking Barr’s physical appearance. You’ll notice that he no longer even touches his lie about there being no prosecutorial misconduct.
Barr is morbidly obese! Funny how Lionel Hutz was a few days ahead of that from Pelosi. Her staff must get their Dozens ideas from nutball sites DAILYkos and DemocratUnderground. You can’t beat Trump at Dozens.
Comments
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
You used to try harder, Lionel. You’ve lost your mediocre fastball, your change-up isn’t Moyer-level, your location is imprecise, so you’re serving up taters on a platter these days. We both know why you still post though.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion
Show us where the bad Orange man and Mean AG touched you on this doll!
And apparently the accusations of Butterball’s dishonesty aren’t limited to those made by Republican appointed federal judges. https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/497044-former-doj-official-department-twisted-my-words-in-motion-to-drop