More on that "fringe conspiracy theory"

SFGbob

http://twitter.com/adamhousley/status/1248454747490619392

Kaepsknee

Invest some time this weekend to watch the video I posted yesterday. It's very technical, partisan and I don't believe Trump is actually mentioned once. It's an hour though.

SFGbob

salemcoog said:

Invest some time this weekend to watch the video I posted yesterday. It's very technical, partisan and I don't believe Trump is actually mentioned once. It's an hour though.

I watched it. They could have lost the ominous music and they got a little out over their skis with the intentional bio-weapon possibility but overall its very informative and it rightfully skewers the Chinese Communist Party.

GrundleStiltzkin

salemcoog said:

Invest some time this weekend to watch the video I posted yesterday. It's very technical, partisan and I don't believe Trump is actually mentioned once. It's an hour though.

I had in on the background and listened, though not closely, to the whole thing.

Claims that COVID was a deliberately engineered bio-weapon and deliberately released to attack the US - 10/10 bullshit. I don't recall whether your video made that claim or not.

Deliberately engineered bio-weapon and accidentally release - 9.5/10 bullshit

Product of deliberate virology research and accidentally released - 9.9/10 truth, totally believable.

I suppose China could have been trying for a new kind of bio-weapon, one that attacks society/economy more than lives per se. However, the same thing that makes COVID implausible as a traditionally-conceived bio-weapon—slow onset, low mortality—make it likely that it would also turn back on the attacking country when used as a bio-economic-weapon.

SFGbob

Claims that COVID was a deliberately engineered bio-weapon and deliberately released to attack the US - 10/10 bullshit. I don't recall whether your video made that claim or not.

They don't state it as an established fact but they do hold it out as a possibility. They primarily focus on your 3rd option and the best available evidence supports that. The wet market as the source is pure bullshit.

Kaepsknee

I guess I have to wonder, what is the point of messing with virus’ if you aren’t going to weaponize them? You already had vaccines for SARS-1.

GrundleStiltzkin

salemcoog said:

I guess I have to wonder, what is the point of messing with virus’ if you aren’t going to weaponize them? You already had vaccines for SARS-1.

When you have the tools, you wanna play with them.

HustlinOwl

salemcoog said:

I guess I have to wonder, what is the point of messing with virus’ if you aren’t going to weaponize them? You already had vaccines for SARS-1.

This is long and boring, but you should get the point.

https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-vi-04-071217-100011

Kaepsknee

HustlinOwl said:

salemcoog said:

I guess I have to wonder, what is the point of messing with virus’ if you aren’t going to weaponize them? You already had vaccines for SARS-1.

This is long and boring, but you should get the point.

https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-vi-04-071217-100011

Thanks for the link. At this point I'm not sure it's worth it. If you developed a cure for cancer, I suppose it would be a win in the long run. But in the here and now. These places need to be shuttered.

GrundleStiltzkin

https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2020/04/10/fcc-chairman-responds-chinese-foreign-ministry-spokesman/

Kaepsknee

^^^^^^ Savage. This guy should be Trumps twat qweefer.