Inflated numbers
Comments
-
Right. First.Bob_C said:
Exactly, the whole reason for distancing/shutdown was for flattening the curve was capacity and supplies. That part isn’t a problem seemingly except for a place or two.salemcoog said:
https://www.koin.com/news/health/coronavirus/the-oregon-clinic-furloughs-820-employees-due-to-covid-19/Sledog said:No beds, no ventilators, medical facilities over flowing......
https://www.foxnews.com/us/washington-field-hospital-coronavirus-dismantle
Oregon clinic lays off 820 today. This is going on at clinics and hospitals all over the country.
And we were told that we needed to shut down, to beat the curve and make sure that the hospitals weren't over run.
I'd say the job is done. Let's get people back to work.
So what’s the current argument for continuing it? It’s now shifted to damage control over inflated models. -
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about. -
When the same people get tested multiple times, you may indeed get multiple negatives. That's not the same as a system of testing the population. Most people still can't get a single test, much less many tests.theknowledge said:
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about. -
Congratulations, murderertheknowledge said:
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about. -
How are your 2 million imaginary dead friends holding up?HHusky said:
When the same people get tested multiple times, you may indeed get multiple negatives. That's not the same as a system of testing the population. Most people still can't get a single test, much less many tests.theknowledge said:
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about. -
How's Sweden's laissez faire approach working out?RaceBannon said:
How are your 2 million imaginary dead friends holding up?HHusky said:
When the same people get tested multiple times, you may indeed get multiple negatives. That's not the same as a system of testing the population. Most people still can't get a single test, much less many tests.theknowledge said:
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about.
Sorry I hurt your feelings. But getting the same negative test result five times from the same guy isn't the same as five people testing negative. -
Same as here meaning I was rightHHusky said:
How's Sweden's laissez faire approach working out?RaceBannon said:
How are your 2 million imaginary dead friends holding up?HHusky said:
When the same people get tested multiple times, you may indeed get multiple negatives. That's not the same as a system of testing the population. Most people still can't get a single test, much less many tests.theknowledge said:
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about.
Sorry I hurt your feelings. But getting the same negative test result five times from the same guy isn't the same as five people testing negative.
And you're wrong
Again -
"anybody who wants a test gets a test"?RaceBannon said:
Same as here meaning I was rightHHusky said:
How's Sweden's laissez faire approach working out?RaceBannon said:
How are your 2 million imaginary dead friends holding up?HHusky said:
When the same people get tested multiple times, you may indeed get multiple negatives. That's not the same as a system of testing the population. Most people still can't get a single test, much less many tests.theknowledge said:
Yet the US has 300,000 more confirmed cases than any other country. Over 450,000 total. When you consider the % of tests that come back negative, I'd say either we are either testing A LOT of people or the numbers are inflated to fit a narrative. Hmm.HHusky said:Anyone who pays any attention at all knows the cases and deaths are undercounted. The only question is how much they are undercounted.
Testing is minimal and scattershot. Another thing Daddy lies to you about.
Sorry I hurt your feelings. But getting the same negative test result five times from the same guy isn't the same as five people testing negative.
And you're wrong
Again -
