Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,575 Founders Club
    No one fucking cares about this loser.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    Social distancing.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,968
    Gosh, I wonder if this has anything to do with him being shit canned.

    https://youtu.be/L2JRsAP0qVQ
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,968
    edited April 2020
    Just doing his job. O'Keefed also appears to be doing the job that he does best, swallowing like a bitch.

    Even more recently the inspector general for the DOJ and FBI, Michael Horowitz, reviewed elements of the DOJ-NSD (National Security Division) that directly relate to Michael Atkinson.

    The DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) chief counsel [formerly Michael Atkinson], and the chief counsel for every FBI field office are required to conduct an “Accuracy Review” of selected FISA applications. One per field office (25 to 30 field offices),which are also sent to DOJ-NSD (main justice) for general counsel inspection.

    Keep in mind, these “accuracy reviews” are known in advance, so the FBI has all the time in the world to select the best FISA file for review. Additionally, I surmise the OIG wanted to inspect the “accuracy review” FISA’s because they would show the best light on the overall system itself. The OIG was looking for the best, most compliant, product to report on.

    However, when the OIG inspected 42 of these Accuracy Reviews, the IG identified that only three of them had accurately assembled documents (Woods File) supporting the application. The error rate within the files self-checked was over 93%.

    So the best FBI files are selected to undergo the FBI and DOJ-NSD accuracy review. The accuracy review takes place by FBI legal counsel and DOJ-NSD legal counsel. However, the IG found that only three FBI applications in the accuracy reviews were compliant.

    The error rate in the files undertaken by the internal accuracy review was over 93% (3 compliant out of 42 reviewed). These were the FISA files with the greatest possibility of being accurate. It was specifically Michael Atkinson who held responsibility for conducting former “accuracy reviews” the IG finds were grossly non compliant.

    The IG memorandum, evaluating the prior performance of Atkinson as legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD, now provides evidence to support President Trump saying he no longer has confidence in ICIG Michael Atkinson. However, in the immediacy of the anti-Trump narratives, almost all media will not see the connection.

    Media reporting on the CIA ‘whistleblower’ and impeachment, ignored Atkinson’s role as legal counsel in the DOJ-NSD.
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,180 Standard Supporter
    HH still believes it was a "Hands UP" incident. LOL!
Sign In or Register to comment.