Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

19039049069089091199

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,261 Founders Club
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,261 Founders Club
    From he way back machine. McGill University "debunking" Gert Vandenbosch's argument that leaky vaccines will set the conditions for variants that evade vaccines to proliferate.

    https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche

    "And lest we forget: the variants of concern making headlines now arose before we had any vaccine against the coronavirus. Dr. Bossche’s concern about imperfect vaccines allowing the virus to mutate should be dwarfed by the much larger, evidence-based worry of allowing the virus to mutate inside of unvaccinated people. Without vaccines, the virus is allowed to jump from person to person and make imperfect copies of itself, and this flawed replication process is like a worldwide game of Russian roulette. Most times, the virus will not mutate or its mutation will be harmless, but the more people incubate the virus, the bigger the chance of a dangerous mutation emerging by chance. Vaccines can put a stop to that."

    "In scenario #1, you get rid of vaccines and lockdowns and allow the virus to spread, practically unimpeded, through the population, killing more and more people and leaving many with long-term health consequences. As the virus spreads, it mutates here and there and new variants of concern emerge. And maybe, at some point, Dr. Bossche validates a new kind of vaccine that works in a completely different way and it eventually allows us to curb the pandemic. Maybe.

    In scenario #2, we vaccinate as many people as we can and as quickly as we can. Cases and deaths go down. If new variants of concern that escape from the protection granted by the vaccines emerge, scientists reformulate the vaccines. This strategy is based on vaccines that target the adaptive arm of our immune system, the same principle that allowed us to slay smallpox and bring polio and measles down to their knees.

    I know which scenario I would choose."

    No one ever said that the vaccines would stop the spread.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2023
    Bob_C said:

    From he way back machine. McGill University "debunking" Gert Vandenbosch's argument that leaky vaccines will set the conditions for variants that evade vaccines to proliferate.

    https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche

    "And lest we forget: the variants of concern making headlines now arose before we had any vaccine against the coronavirus. Dr. Bossche’s concern about imperfect vaccines allowing the virus to mutate should be dwarfed by the much larger, evidence-based worry of allowing the virus to mutate inside of unvaccinated people. Without vaccines, the virus is allowed to jump from person to person and make imperfect copies of itself, and this flawed replication process is like a worldwide game of Russian roulette. Most times, the virus will not mutate or its mutation will be harmless, but the more people incubate the virus, the bigger the chance of a dangerous mutation emerging by chance. Vaccines can put a stop to that."

    "In scenario #1, you get rid of vaccines and lockdowns and allow the virus to spread, practically unimpeded, through the population, killing more and more people and leaving many with long-term health consequences. As the virus spreads, it mutates here and there and new variants of concern emerge. And maybe, at some point, Dr. Bossche validates a new kind of vaccine that works in a completely different way and it eventually allows us to curb the pandemic. Maybe.

    In scenario #2, we vaccinate as many people as we can and as quickly as we can. Cases and deaths go down. If new variants of concern that escape from the protection granted by the vaccines emerge, scientists reformulate the vaccines. This strategy is based on vaccines that target the adaptive arm of our immune system, the same principle that allowed us to slay smallpox and bring polio and measles down to their knees.

    I know which scenario I would choose."

    No one ever said that the vaccines would stop the spread.

    Dazzler's kid was indoctrinated at McGill, wasn't he/she/xe?


  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,849 Founders Club



    Show me someone who has fibromyalgia, and I'll show you a trashy fat white woman who doesn't want to work.
    It's fucking clinical depression. Rampant in trashy fat white women.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,261 Founders Club

    Bob_C said:

    From he way back machine. McGill University "debunking" Gert Vandenbosch's argument that leaky vaccines will set the conditions for variants that evade vaccines to proliferate.

    https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche

    "And lest we forget: the variants of concern making headlines now arose before we had any vaccine against the coronavirus. Dr. Bossche’s concern about imperfect vaccines allowing the virus to mutate should be dwarfed by the much larger, evidence-based worry of allowing the virus to mutate inside of unvaccinated people. Without vaccines, the virus is allowed to jump from person to person and make imperfect copies of itself, and this flawed replication process is like a worldwide game of Russian roulette. Most times, the virus will not mutate or its mutation will be harmless, but the more people incubate the virus, the bigger the chance of a dangerous mutation emerging by chance. Vaccines can put a stop to that."

    "In scenario #1, you get rid of vaccines and lockdowns and allow the virus to spread, practically unimpeded, through the population, killing more and more people and leaving many with long-term health consequences. As the virus spreads, it mutates here and there and new variants of concern emerge. And maybe, at some point, Dr. Bossche validates a new kind of vaccine that works in a completely different way and it eventually allows us to curb the pandemic. Maybe.

    In scenario #2, we vaccinate as many people as we can and as quickly as we can. Cases and deaths go down. If new variants of concern that escape from the protection granted by the vaccines emerge, scientists reformulate the vaccines. This strategy is based on vaccines that target the adaptive arm of our immune system, the same principle that allowed us to slay smallpox and bring polio and measles down to their knees.

    I know which scenario I would choose."

    No one ever said that the vaccines would stop the spread.

    Dazzler's kid was indoctrinated at McGill, wasn't he/she/xe?


    Gert was first and right. His pod with Weinstein back in early 2021 blew my mind where he called exactly what happened. Weinstein on with Rogan talking about him made me think of this.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club
    Throw together kraken with some Xs and numbers and shit and presto a new thing to fear

    Vax and mask folks