Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread
Comments
-
-
Too bad for them we don't listen to them.
Their followers sure do.
-
Love her.
-
So the CIA decided they wanted Roland dead
That son-of-a-bitch Van Owen blew off Roland's head
Related: Alex Berenson: Ralph Baric, the world’s top coronavirus researcher, discussed “human adaptation” of coronaviruses with the CIA before Covid began. “Does that mean the CIA caused Covid? Well, no. But it does mean Baric needs to answer publicly about his relationship with US intelligence agencies before and during Covid – and his silence since.
https://www.racket.news/p/big-story-on-pandemic-origins
Big Story on Pandemic Origins?Newly released documents again point to American complicity in developing the Covid virus
Matt TaibbiNov 12, 2025
Emily Kopp of the Daily Caller has done an excellent write-up of just-released documents that appear related to Covid’s origins. The punchline is that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence “facilitated a meeting between the CIA and [University of North Carolina professor Ralph] Baric about a project on coronaviruses in September 2015.” Kopp writes:
The email exchange with the subject line “Request for Your Expertise” shows an unnamed government official with a CIA-affiliated email address pitching a “possible project” to Baric relating to “[c]oronavirus evolution and possible natural human adaptation.”
The new documents shed a bit of light on a question members of Congress have posed for years: Whether our own intelligence agencies knew more about the likelihood of a lab origin of COVID than they told the public.
-
-
What excess deaths? Believe the Science. Just don't ask any questions and we won't give you access to raw data because it might stress out a parent whose formerly healthy 30 year old son just died from turbo colon cancer after getting double vaxxed and boosted per government mandated shots.
https://ace.mu.nu/
UK Government Is Hiding Excess Covid Vaccine Deaths
I shan't believe it, I simply shannot.
Government 'withholding data that may link Covid jab to excess deaths'
UKHSA argued that releasing figures would lead to 'distress or anger' of bereaved relatives if connection were discovered
The public health watchdog has been accused of a "cover-up" after refusing to publish data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths.The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to the "distress or anger" of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered.
Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died.
Last year, a cross-party group expressed alarm about "growing public and professional concerns" over the UK's rates of excess deaths since 2020.
In a letter to UKHSA and Department for Health, the MPs and peers said that potentially critical data -- which map the date of people's Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths -- had been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
...
UsForThem, a campaign group, requested that UKHSA release the data under freedom of information laws. But the agency refused, making a number of different arguments including that publishing the data "could lead to misinformation" that would "have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake" in the public.
...
Reform UK has committed to a public inquiry into excess deaths and alleged Covid vaccine harms.
...
Ben Kingsley, the legal director of UsForThem, said the way the UKHSA had handled the case "reveals a desperation that this data should not, in any form, see the light of day".
He added: "It is perverse for UKHSA to argue that this data should not be released because the public could feel distressed or angry if patterns or correlations were to be identified.
"You have to ask yourself why it is that the public are considered incapable of handling this data. It reveals a patronising mindset, which also characterised the pandemic response -- 'do what we say, don't ask any questions, we know what is best for you'."
The demand is for a release of anonymized data -- names stripped out.
But this agency covering up the vaccine deaths keeps lying, claiming that an anonymized list would still, somehow, reveal the identity of people killed by the clot-shot.
-
Deboonked!
-
-
-
yeah but still
