Home› Yellow Snow's Record Shoppe

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sweet 16 - Comedy / Sitcoms / Soaps: #2 King of the Hill vs #3 Cheers

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
in Yellow Snow's Record Shoppe




Sweet 16 - Comedy / Sitcoms / Soaps: #2 King of the Hill vs #3 Cheers 31 votes

#2 King of the Hill
70%
DerekJohnsonCFetters_Nacho_LoverFire_Marshall_BillSwayeThomasFremontRoadDawg55Mad_SonYouKnowItdncchuckbiak1Bad_MotherDuckerWilburHooksHandsGrundleStiltzkinwhatshouldicareaboutDoog_de_JourNEsnake12YellowSnowBleachedAnusDawgUW_Doog_Bot 22 votes
#3 Cheers
29%
RaceBannonPurpleThrobberDooglesMakaDawghuskyhooligantheknowledgeLesGrossmanRDR1to392831weretaken 9 votes
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,497 Founders Club
    #2 King of the Hill
    Injun gets the white wimenz always gets mah vote.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,064 Swaye's Wigwam
    #2 King of the Hill
    Both pretty weak. I think these were poorly seeded and never should have been a round two matchup. It's bound to happen...not a criticism of the tourney brass. We've had way, way better shows than both already eliminated though
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    #2 King of the Hill
    chuck said:

    Both pretty weak. I think these were poorly seeded and never should have been a round two matchup. It's bound to happen...not a criticism of the tourney brass. We've had way, way better shows than both already eliminated though

    Cheers was a pretty yuge show. Maybe not to our? demographic but it's definitely considered one of the all time great sitcoms. King of the Hill might be a little high here but it's tied for 3rd all time with Family Guy in the cartoon bracket.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,064 Swaye's Wigwam
    #2 King of the Hill
    YellowSnow said:

    chuck said:

    Both pretty weak. I think these were poorly seeded and never should have been a round two matchup. It's bound to happen...not a criticism of the tourney brass. We've had way, way better shows than both already eliminated though

    Cheers was a pretty yuge show. Maybe not to our? demographic but it's definitely considered one of the all time great sitcoms. King of the Hill might be a little high here but it's tied for 3rd all time with Family Guy in the cartoon bracket.
    That's why I am lamenting but not criticizing the seeding. You have to consider popularity, longevity, etc. Objectively they're probably both where they should be. Neither comes all that close to the 2-3 seeds as I would have subjectively seeded them though. I would have arranged things so all my favorites had easy passes in round one (kind of like Neil Young vs Rod Stewart...wait, what?) and some shit I didn't like would have gone against the likes of south park and the Simpsons in round two.

    I have no integrity. I also would have taken bribes allowing rich, powerful posters to manipulate seeding. That's why I'm not allowed my own board.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,630 Swaye's Wigwam
    #3 Cheers
    chuck said:

    YellowSnow said:

    chuck said:

    Both pretty weak. I think these were poorly seeded and never should have been a round two matchup. It's bound to happen...not a criticism of the tourney brass. We've had way, way better shows than both already eliminated though

    Cheers was a pretty yuge show. Maybe not to our? demographic but it's definitely considered one of the all time great sitcoms. King of the Hill might be a little high here but it's tied for 3rd all time with Family Guy in the cartoon bracket.
    That's why I am lamenting but not criticizing the seeding. You have to consider popularity, longevity, etc. Objectively they're probably both where they should be. Neither comes all that close to the 2-3 seeds as I would have subjectively seeded them though. I would have arranged things so all my favorites had easy passes in round one (kind of like Neil Young vs Rod Stewart...wait, what?) and some shit I didn't like would have gone against the likes of south park and the Simpsons in round two.

    I have no integrity. I also would have taken bribes allowing rich, powerful posters to manipulate seeding. That's why I'm not allowed my own board.
    The seeding says Arrested Development is a 4 seed and King of the Hill is a 2. You're right, and the seeding is objectively wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746
    edited April 2020
    #2 King of the Hill
    King of the Hill is overseeded but good. Cheers sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    #2 King of the Hill
    Mike Judge is a genius. I know DJ agrees.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746
    #2 King of the Hill
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Mike Judge is a genius. I know DJ agrees.

    Agree. KOTH isn't even his best work. He's nails.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,237 Standard Supporter
    #3 Cheers
    The Throbber is having issue even voting in the category.

    No All My Children, No GH. WTF?!?! That was damned near every day in the chapter room back in the day.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.