Hopefully this will be the last top state recruit who winds up at another school.
Can't wait until Passion blames Petersen for this.
Listen and try and understand. First of all, Biggins said (not me) that one of Petersen's initial challenges will be to develop relationships with blue chippers (i.e., 4 and 5 star recruits) for the 2014 and 2015 class. At boise it wasn't worth his time to focus on the budda bakers, so he wisely didn't do so. I think it was an intelligent use of his time. Focus on the guys he could get, and then develop the talent.
This is an example of where Biggins was correct. Petersen has no relationship with Budda. Budda surely knows who Petersen is - as does everyone in college football. But they haven't developed the kind of personal relationship that is often required to land the top fish.
Now that Petersen is at a school with all the requirements to get top recruits, he can focus on developing those relationships.
Do I blame him for budda? No, as I think that budda has been drawn to the trash in eugene for a while. However, at some point this in-state bleeding has got to stop, and it's Petersen's job to stop it. It's pathetic.
Peterson can't recruit at this level. Proof is in the poohnani
Give Peter time, he's used to recruiting truckers. Maybe one of you guys should walk him away from the Kenworth plant in Renton and over to Moobs alma mater.
Biggins was also the schmuck that said it was between UW and UCLA as Oregon had lost its luster to Budda....
Nope, that was Eklund. Either Biggins or Huffman was on their radio show later in the week and Eklund said something like "I've hear Oregon is losing it's luster with recruits, what;s your take on that? Is that what you;ve been hearing too?"
The response was "No, I'm definitely not seeing that"
Eugene has Kip Kinkel, the Mckenzie River and the Autzen rapist. What recruit wouldn't pass all this up? Not to mention Colt Lyerla will be hanging around for awhile longer.
Hopefully this will be the last top state recruit who winds up at another school.
Can't wait until Passion blames Petersen for this.
Listen and try and understand. First of all, Biggins said (not me) that one of Petersen's initial challenges will be to develop relationships with blue chippers (i.e., 4 and 5 star recruits) for the 2014 and 2015 class. At boise it wasn't worth his time to focus on the budda bakers, so he wisely didn't do so. I think it was an intelligent use of his time. Focus on the guys he could get, and then develop the talent.
This is an example of where Biggins was correct. Petersen has no relationship with Budda. Budda surely knows who Petersen is - as does everyone in college football. But they haven't developed the kind of personal relationship that is often required to land the top fish.
Now that Petersen is at a school with all the requirements to get top recruits, he can focus on developing those relationships.
Do I blame him for budda? No, as I think that budda has been drawn to the trash in eugene for a while. However, at some point this in-state bleeding has got to stop, and it's Petersen's job to stop it. It's pathetic.
Biggins was also the schmuck that said it was between UW and UCLA as Oregon had lost its luster to Budda....
It doesn't mean he's wrong on every issue. Developing relationships is key. I'm sure Petersen and Goncharoff (sp?) will become well-acquainted.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. I stated facts and your response is pure conjecture.
Biggins was that schmuck saying such bologna regarding Budda on media sites 48 hours ago. Si, o no??
Stick to the facts Passion.
bananasnblondes and BlowItUp are right. It was eklund that spewed that crap, and Biggins disagreed. It happens a lot. Biggins and Huffman have frequently said, "that's not what I'm hearing" after some dumb comment made by eklund.
This thread is a great example of why it can be hard to have an intelligent conversation here. The only person dumber than an idiot (misterem) who spews something incorrect and criticizes somebody else for not "sticking to the facts," is the idiot who opens his mouth to back him up (he_needs_more_brains). LOL.
Comments
This is an example of where Biggins was correct. Petersen has no relationship with Budda. Budda surely knows who Petersen is - as does everyone in college football. But they haven't developed the kind of personal relationship that is often required to land the top fish.
Now that Petersen is at a school with all the requirements to get top recruits, he can focus on developing those relationships.
Do I blame him for budda? No, as I think that budda has been drawn to the trash in eugene for a while. However, at some point this in-state bleeding has got to stop, and it's Petersen's job to stop it. It's pathetic.
Biggins was that schmuck saying such bologna regarding Budda on media sites 48 hours ago. Si, o no??
Stick to the facts Passion.
The response was "No, I'm definitely not seeing that"
Biggins is pretty connected and seems to avoid putting his foot in his mouth all the time.
unlike, F3, Kim and Eklund.
This thread is a great example of why it can be hard to have an intelligent conversation here. The only person dumber than an idiot (misterem) who spews something incorrect and criticizes somebody else for not "sticking to the facts," is the idiot who opens his mouth to back him up (he_needs_more_brains). LOL.