Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Commie liars gonna lie

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,126 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
Seriously, FTGs
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/chinas-devastating-lies/
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,972
    If only we'd of had our health expert in Beijing, none of this would have happened.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,126 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    I bet Xi was jerking off politburo punks for a foot of quan (hi Ruth) back in the day.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,740 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    Seriously. The Chi Coms are some of the biggest shit head, pussies. They basically sat out WWII and let Chang fight the Japanese and then were tan, rested and ready for round 2 of the Civil War. We could have easily nuked them in 1950- 51 and chose not to escalate and settle for draw.

    No country did more to raise their standard of living than the USA, and now these cunts are trying to use their bullshit propaganda to blame us for their wetmarket flu.

    FUCK THOSE GUYS
    are you saying Truman screwed us by firing MacArthur?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,791 Standard Supporter
    LebamDawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    Seriously. The Chi Coms are some of the biggest shit head, pussies. They basically sat out WWII and let Chang fight the Japanese and then were tan, rested and ready for round 2 of the Civil War. We could have easily nuked them in 1950- 51 and chose not to escalate and settle for draw.

    No country did more to raise their standard of living than the USA, and now these cunts are trying to use their bullshit propaganda to blame us for their wetmarket flu.

    FUCK THOSE GUYS
    are you saying Truman screwed us by firing MacArthur?
    Not according to one of the Throbber's two dads.

    Until his last breath. He fucking hated MacArthur. Pa Throbber 1 of 2 was stationed on MacArthur's staff in both Korea and Tokyo. Fucking HATED him.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,126 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    LebamDawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    Seriously. The Chi Coms are some of the biggest shit head, pussies. They basically sat out WWII and let Chang fight the Japanese and then were tan, rested and ready for round 2 of the Civil War. We could have easily nuked them in 1950- 51 and chose not to escalate and settle for draw.

    No country did more to raise their standard of living than the USA, and now these cunts are trying to use their bullshit propaganda to blame us for their wetmarket flu.

    FUCK THOSE GUYS
    are you saying Truman screwed us by firing MacArthur?
    Not according to one of the Throbber's two dads.

    Until his last breath. He fucking hated MacArthur. Pa Throbber 1 of 2 was stationed on MacArthur's staff in both Korea and Tokyo. Fucking HATED him.



    He was a vain sum bitch no doubt and Truman was right to fire his ass. Civilians dictate overall strategy to the Generals, not the over way around.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,435 Standard Supporter
    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,611
    PurpleThrobber said:

    LebamDawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    Seriously. The Chi Coms are some of the biggest shit head, pussies. They basically sat out WWII and let Chang fight the Japanese and then were tan, rested and ready for round 2 of the Civil War. We could have easily nuked them in 1950- 51 and chose not to escalate and settle for draw.

    No country did more to raise their standard of living than the USA, and now these cunts are trying to use their bullshit propaganda to blame us for their wetmarket flu.

    FUCK THOSE GUYS
    are you saying Truman screwed us by firing MacArthur?
    Not according to one of the Throbber's two dads.

    Until his last breath. He fucking hated MacArthur. Pa Throbber 1 of 2 was stationed on MacArthur's staff in both Korea and Tokyo. Fucking HATED him.



    I worked with a Bataan Death March survivor. He hated MacArthur’s guts. And it’s Ridgeway that prevented us from getting routed in Korea.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,126 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    LebamDawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:


    Seriously. The Chi Coms are some of the biggest shit head, pussies. They basically sat out WWII and let Chang fight the Japanese and then were tan, rested and ready for round 2 of the Civil War. We could have easily nuked them in 1950- 51 and chose not to escalate and settle for draw.

    No country did more to raise their standard of living than the USA, and now these cunts are trying to use their bullshit propaganda to blame us for their wetmarket flu.

    FUCK THOSE GUYS
    are you saying Truman screwed us by firing MacArthur?
    Not according to one of the Throbber's two dads.

    Until his last breath. He fucking hated MacArthur. Pa Throbber 1 of 2 was stationed on MacArthur's staff in both Korea and Tokyo. Fucking HATED him.



    I worked with a Bataan Death March survivor. He hated MacArthur’s guts. And it’s Ridgeway that prevented us from getting routed in Korea.
    Bataan wasn't all MacArthur's fault. It was the US Government's decision to not attempt to reinforce/resupply our troops in the Philippines. The risk was too great for the Navy. That said, they could have prepped supplies and defensive positions better for the retreat.

    MacArthur did save the war from being lost at Incheon so he deserves some credit here. But, yes, Ridgeway salvages the bad situation in 1951 and got us the tie. People forget the massive casualties we inflicted on the chi comes to force a stalemate.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,740 Standard Supporter
    I think taking the non-war into the sacred land of China would have solved a ton of problems that have since developed.

    I love the fact that 200K+ Chinese troops were in Korea, nukes were being reassigned to the military, and the CIA reported to Truman that the Chinese were not going to go on any offense operations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,126 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.

    We didn't have anywhere close to enough A-bombs in 1945 to finish of the Ruskies. The amount of casualties if would have required to push them out of Eastern Europe in 1945 or 1946 (if it was even possible) is unfathomable. 90% of Wehrmacht casualties in WWII were from the Ruskies. The Red Army wasn't going anywhere.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,611
    edited March 2020
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.

    We didn't have anywhere close to enough A-bombs in 1945 to finish of the Ruskies. The amount of casualties if would have required to push them out of Eastern Europe in 1945 or 1946 (if it was even possible) is unfathomable. 90% of Wehrmacht casualties in WWII were from the Ruskies. The Red Army wasn't going anywhere.
    And let's not pretend the public would have tolerated an encore either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,126 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.

    We didn't have anywhere close to enough A-bombs in 1945 to finish of the Ruskies. The amount of casualties if would have required to push them out of Eastern Europe in 1945 or 1946 (if it was even possible) is unfathomable. 90% of Wehrmacht casualties in WWII were from the Ruskies. The Red Army wasn't going anywhere.
    And let's not pretend the public would have tolerated an encore either.
    Of course not. It's completely silly to even consider as having been politically possible. By the time the American Public began to realize Uncle @DerekJohnson was no longer our? fren most of our Army had been disbanded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,435 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.

    We didn't have anywhere close to enough A-bombs in 1945 to finish of the Ruskies. The amount of casualties if would have required to push them out of Eastern Europe in 1945 or 1946 (if it was even possible) is unfathomable. 90% of Wehrmacht casualties in WWII were from the Ruskies. The Red Army wasn't going anywhere.
    We supplied a lot of there gear and food. We were at full mobilization and war production. We could have crushed them fairly quickly.

    Would have finished a few nukes pretty quick too in order to speed it up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,740 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.

    We didn't have anywhere close to enough A-bombs in 1945 to finish of the Ruskies. The amount of casualties if would have required to push them out of Eastern Europe in 1945 or 1946 (if it was even possible) is unfathomable. 90% of Wehrmacht casualties in WWII were from the Ruskies. The Red Army wasn't going anywhere.
    And let's not pretend the public would have tolerated an encore either.
    Of course not. It's completely silly to even consider as having been politically possible. By the time the American Public began to realize Uncle @DerekJohnson was no longer our? fren most of our Army had been disbanded.
    Well FDR's man Alger Hiss might have had something to do with us (the general public) not knowing the Russkies were bad.

    I remember my first FIL (I number wives and in-laws) still ranting and raving about how Alger Hiss got into FDRs ear.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,611
    LebamDawg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    Funny Patton wanted to mop up the Russians and MacArthur wanted to mop up the Chinese.

    Both were right. What would the world have been without Russia? China might not have caused any trouble without Russias support.

    We didn't have anywhere close to enough A-bombs in 1945 to finish of the Ruskies. The amount of casualties if would have required to push them out of Eastern Europe in 1945 or 1946 (if it was even possible) is unfathomable. 90% of Wehrmacht casualties in WWII were from the Ruskies. The Red Army wasn't going anywhere.
    And let's not pretend the public would have tolerated an encore either.
    Of course not. It's completely silly to even consider as having been politically possible. By the time the American Public began to realize Uncle @DerekJohnson was no longer our? fren most of our Army had been disbanded.
    Well FDR's man Alger Hiss might have had something to do with us (the general public) not knowing the Russkies were bad.

    I remember my first FIL (I number wives and in-laws) still ranting and raving about how Alger Hiss got into FDRs ear.
    The American public had had enough of wartime deprivation and wouldn’t have tolerated more of it regardless of one’s opinion of the Russians. In addition, the Russians had been touted as our comrades in arms for the previous three plus years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,740 Standard Supporter
    you don't think a Soviet spy as assistant Sect of State and developing/influencing foreign policy could have a say in what was official statements our government would make about the Russians?

    I have no idea how the majority of Americans were feeling - other than happy the war was over, but at the ready for another war? I have no idea.
    A few well placed soviet moles could easily sway public opinion toward anti-war pro Russia feelings. Kind of like lots of the press are pushing the proper ways to call the Wuhan virus by the a name that was given it to a few months late, and by a name the Chinese government wishes you would use
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.