Some chinteresting data on Pete's last 3 years from WestCoastCFB
Still 3rd best in Pac at outperforming talent on roster.
Comments
-
You are better than thjs
-
What does this even mean? Go get back on the bus and carry on.FireCohen said:You are better than thjs
-
This was well-derided yesterday https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1271933/#Comment_1271933
-
Ah shit. I need to do better about looking in Husky Jacks. FML.GrundleStiltzkin said:This was well-derided yesterday https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1271933/#Comment_1271933
-
Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.
Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.
I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good. -
Good analysis here Creep.creepycoug said:Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.
Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.
I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good.
The 5 wins were as follows...
2017 UCLA and Oregon (they were one spot higher than us in 247 composite that year)
2018 Stanford and UCLA
2019 USC
Not exactly murderer's row. -
The world's toughest schedule stat suffers the samecreepycoug said:Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.
Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.
I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good.
The worst teams always have the toughest schedules. Now ask yourself why -
Yup. There you have it.YellowSnow said:
Good analysis here Creep.creepycoug said:Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.
Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.
I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good.
The 5 wins were as follows...
2017 UCLA and Oregon (they were one spot higher than us in 247 composite that year)
2018 Stanford and UCLA
2019 USC
Not exactly murderer's row.
But, but, but we do more with less.
I hate the fucking saying. It's for losers. -
Looking ahead to the 247 composite 2020 rankings, there were only be 3 teams ahead of UW on the schedule in terms of overall talent: USC, Oregon and Michigan and if they are ranked higher then us it's only by a c-hair.creepycoug said:
Yup. There you have it.YellowSnow said:
Good analysis here Creep.creepycoug said:Of course, the problem with this stat is that, if you have talent like Washington has, your comparator group is going to be comprised of very good teams.
Conversely, when you don't have talent, you only need to beat teams that have more talent, but are not necessarily good themselves. Shit beats slightly less shit all the tim. It's a different thing to beat genuinely good teams.
I'm not apologizing for Toothy; and this stat can reveal coaches who underperform with what they have. But there's a reason Cuog is atop this poll and it's not all because of the Pirate. Cuog's comparator group is not a murderer's row, and he has that passing game that will allow him to beat some teams who may be better overall, but not necessarily elite or even very good.
The 5 wins were as follows...
2017 UCLA and Oregon (they were one spot higher than us in 247 composite that year)
2018 Stanford and UCLA
2019 USC
Not exactly murderer's row.
But, but, but we do more with less.
I hate the fucking saying. It's for losers.
Jimmy really needs to go 10-2 or better to instill a lot of confidence in the half brain segment of the fan base. I will tolerate 9-3 but won't be happy. -
Fun time ridding those back in the dayYellowSnow said:
What does this even mean? Go get back on the bus and carry on.FireCohen said:You are better than thjs
