Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why winning big in year 1 is so important

2

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,046 Founders Club
    Gladstone said:

    Disagree on the NFL. He could be there now

    not as a HC
    Then he should have spent the last 5 years in the NFL as an assistant
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,855 Founders Club

    Jimmy needs to go 6-3 in pac or better in year 1. No excuses.

    3 conference losses? Not gonna cut it.
    It's far from ideal. But looking at the schedule and breaking in a new QB, 6-3 in Pac doesn't = @FireJimmy. 5-4 or worse does in my view. 7-2 or better and Jimmy could end up being the guy.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,410

    Jimmy needs to go 6-3 in pac or better in year 1. No excuses.

    3 conference losses? Not gonna cut it.
    It's far from ideal. But looking at the schedule and breaking in a new QB, 6-3 in Pac doesn't = @FireJimmy. 5-4 or worse does in my view. 7-2 or better and Jimmy could end up being the guy.
    This is how it starts Yella. First, it's a pimple on your nose.

    Then, .....
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,855 Founders Club

    Jimmy needs to go 6-3 in pac or better in year 1. No excuses.

    3 conference losses? Not gonna cut it.
    It's far from ideal. But looking at the schedule and breaking in a new QB, 6-3 in Pac doesn't = @FireJimmy. 5-4 or worse does in my view. 7-2 or better and Jimmy could end up being the guy.
    This is how it starts Yella. First, it's a pimple on your nose.

    Then, .....
    Jiminy @creepycoug ... this take is twash as fuck. We let Toothy go 4-5 and 4-5 and no one seriously wanted to fire him in 2015.

    This isn't rocket science. If Jimmy goes 6-3 in year 1 and doesn't win the Pac it's not a red flag, we fucked up the hire moment.


  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,410

    Jimmy needs to go 6-3 in pac or better in year 1. No excuses.

    3 conference losses? Not gonna cut it.
    It's far from ideal. But looking at the schedule and breaking in a new QB, 6-3 in Pac doesn't = @FireJimmy. 5-4 or worse does in my view. 7-2 or better and Jimmy could end up being the guy.
    This is how it starts Yella. First, it's a pimple on your nose.

    Then, .....
    Jiminy @creepycoug ... this take is twash as fuck. We let Toothy go 4-5 and 4-5 and no one seriously wanted to fire him in 2015.

    This isn't rocket science. If Jimmy goes 6-3 in year 1 and doesn't win the Pac it's not a red flag, we fucked up the hire moment.


    And look where that gotcha.

    I'm concerned about your facility for rational thought on this topic.

    I thought when Mario was running the show down at Oregon a 9 win season meant failure.

    The standard has been set here. Win or GTFO.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,650 Founders Club
    Does the roster still have more than 40+ blue chips? Is the Pac12 still twash? 10 Wins or more or gtfo.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,855 Founders Club

    Does the roster still have more than 40+ blue chips? Is the Pac12 still twash? 10 Wins or more or gtfo.

    Apparently, a lot of our blue chips were overrated by the TBS bros.
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 6,128

    Does the roster still have more than 40+ blue chips? Is the Pac12 still twash? 10 Wins or more or gtfo.

    Apparently the defence on there own wins 7 games as was proven last year. They need to put together an offense that can win the other 3 games a year.


    8-4
  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,470
    Could this be addressed on the podcast?