If Jimmy lands Costello...
Comments
-
Remember when leach at miss state beat u out for the QB you wanted and cost you 2 wins
-
That's 1 more than he ever got at wazzu.Pitchfork51 said:Remember when leach at miss state beat u out for the QB you wanted and cost you 2 wins
-
Pitchfork51 said:
Remember when leach at miss state beat u out for the QB you wanted and cost you 2 wins
-
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.Canadawg said:
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memoryThomasFremont said:
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.Canadawg said:@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot -
No coffee for Jimbo.
-
Cristobal. 1
Leach. 1
Jimmy. 0 -
Completely agree but that's not what I'm taking issue with. I said I hoped he signs for just that reason but find it ridiculous that people think its him or nothing. That's allThomasFremont said:
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.Canadawg said:
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memoryThomasFremont said:
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.Canadawg said:@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot -
Or we think he would have been better than what we have? A QB that has proven he can play is better than one that hasn’t.Canadawg said:
Completely agree but that's not what I'm taking issue with. I said I hoped he signs for just that reason but find it ridiculous that people think its him or nothing. That's allThomasFremont said:
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.Canadawg said:
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memoryThomasFremont said:
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.Canadawg said:@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot -
That’s not the point at all, and the fact that you have to continue to misrepresent the opposing position reveals how weak yours is.Canadawg said:
Completely agree but that's not what I'm taking issue with. I said I hoped he signs for just that reason but find it ridiculous that people think its him or nothing. That's allThomasFremont said:
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.Canadawg said:
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memoryThomasFremont said:
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.Canadawg said:@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
You even backpedal like a doog. -
Why do you hate Helton?DerekJohnson said:Cristobal. 1
Leach. 1
Jimmy. 0
