Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

So why did Burisma hire Hunter Biden?

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
O'Keefed screwed up his courage enough to lightly rap Hunter on the knuckles and concede that he was trading on his dad's name. But why would Burisma hire him in the first place? What were they getting out of the deal? We know what Hunter was getting, but what benefit was Burisma getting from hiring Hunter?

And spare me the GDS cock suck that they were getting a highly qualified lawyer who was well qualified to overlook high level contracts and business negotiations.
«13456

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    They didn't hire him. He was a paid board member. Maybe they needed access to hookers and blow. You telling me you hate hookers and blow now? @Swaye
  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    Hookers and blow is not a partisan issue!
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,015
    One reason is so they could use his name/connections to lobby the state department to get Ukraine to back off investigating Burisma. At least that's what some FOI emails showed.




  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,765 Founders Club
    No wonder the ambassador got fired
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited January 2020

    One reason is so they could use his name/connections to lobby the state department to get Ukraine to back off investigating Burisma. At least that's what some FOI emails showed.




    Gosh, if Burisma was using the fact that Hunter was on the BOD in order to proclaim their innocence and vouch for their lack of corruption, that sure seems like more than O'Keefed's sword swallowing act on behalf of Hunter where he dismissed the hire as nothing more than Hunter trading off his name.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,673 Standard Supporter
    Why does a oligarch controlled private company need a board?

    An independent board is not required.

  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    SFGbob said:

    O'Keefed screwed up his courage enough to lightly rap Hunter on the knuckles and concede that he was trading on his dad's name. But why would Burisma hire him in the first place? What were they getting out of the deal? We know what Hunter was getting, but what benefit was Burisma getting from hiring Hunter?

    And spare me the GDS cock suck that they were getting a highly qualified lawyer who was well qualified to overlook high level contracts and business negotiations.

    Likely potential future political favors. Next question.

    PS. You do realize President Trump would likely be a nobody without his fathers seed money and significant influence in the real estate industry?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,673 Standard Supporter

    Why does a oligarch controlled private company need a board?

    An independent board is not required.

    Hint: There's only two reasons - neither of which have anything to do with 'advisory' capacity.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,431
    SFGbob said:

    O'Keefed screwed up his courage enough to lightly rap Hunter on the knuckles and concede that he was trading on his dad's name. But why would Burisma hire him in the first place? What were they getting out of the deal? We know what Hunter was getting, but what benefit was Burisma getting from hiring Hunter?

    And spare me the GDS cock suck that they were getting a highly qualified lawyer who was well qualified to overlook high level contracts and business negotiations.

    I have no idea what they got. Maybe they believed they'd get something and were mistaken.

    Tell us what they got, blob.