Remembering Pelluer's 2-Pointer: 222 Days to Michigan
I'm writing this without having watched this video or read the article... But I was 12 years old at that time. Pelluer got sacked late in the third quarter and fumbled. Michigan recovered either inside the UW 10 yard line or maybe in the end zone. Michigan went ahead 24-10. I started throwing a mini-tantrum and told my dad it was all over. He turned to me and said "Son, never lose faith in the Huskies. I will bet you $1 that the Huskies will come back to win."
In the fourth quarter Pelluer completed something like 15 passes in a row, and of course the Huskies won 25-24 on the 2-point conversion in the end zone. Dad claims that I never settled up on that bet, but I'm sure I did.
Curious to see what other details @RaceBannon might add. (He would have been around 95 years old at that time).
Comments
-
When they hit the conversion I jumped up and hit my brother in the head with my elbow
-
Your other Dad should have covered your bet for you.
Very disturbing. A black eye for the Johnson’s, IMO. -
Sounds like Papa Johnson is only $128 away from joining the Wam!
-
Now we know where @DerekJohnson gets the money grabbing from.DerekJohnson said:https://si.com/college/washington/legends/1983-pelluer-pass-could-be-greatest-2-pointer-in-husky-history
I'm writing this without having watched this video or read the article... But I was 12 years old at that time. Pelluer got sacked late in the third quarter and fumbled. Michigan recovered either inside the UW 10 yard line or maybe in the end zone. Michigan went ahead 24-10. I started throwing a mini-tantrum and told my dad it was all over. He turned to me and said "Son, never lose faith in the Huskies. I will bet you $1 that the Huskies will come back to win."
In the fourth quarter Pelluer completed something like 15 passes in a row, and of course the Huskies won 25-24 on the 2-point conversion in the end zone. Dad claims that I never settled up on that bet, but I'm sure I did.
Curious to see what other details @RaceBannon might add. (He would have been around 95 years old at that time). -
And thanks Taft!
-
This game is the biggest difference between James and Petersen. Michigan was bigger and better. They dominated the game. And lost. James had a knack for that even though he should have been fired numerous times
Its why I thought Petersen could be better and win more consistently but he couldn't. Because he was a soft fucking loser
James was hard as nails -
He deserved it.RaceBannon said:When they hit the conversion I jumped up and hit my brother in the head with my elbow
-
Never change race, can’t chin this enoughRaceBannon said:This game is the biggest difference between James and Petersen. Michigan was bigger and better. They dominated the game. And lost. James had a knack for that even though he should have been fired numerous times
Its why I thought Petersen could be better and win more consistently but he couldn't. Because he was a soft fucking loser
James was hard as nails -
Pete was a nervous wreck anytime we were losing at all. We didn’t have any comeback wins with him that I can remember off the top of my head. Maybe the Arizona close call in 2016, but that was pretty close the whole time.RaceBannon said:This game is the biggest difference between James and Petersen. Michigan was bigger and better. They dominated the game. And lost. James had a knack for that even though he should have been fired numerous times
Its why I thought Petersen could be better and win more consistently but he couldn't. Because he was a soft fucking loser
James was hard as nails -
Utah 2018RoadDawg55 said:
Pete was a nervous wreck anytime we were losing at all. We didn’t have any comeback wins with him that I can remember off the top of my head. Maybe the Arizona close call in 2016, but that was pretty close the whole time.RaceBannon said:This game is the biggest difference between James and Petersen. Michigan was bigger and better. They dominated the game. And lost. James had a knack for that even though he should have been fired numerous times
Its why I thought Petersen could be better and win more consistently but he couldn't. Because he was a soft fucking loser
James was hard as nails







