Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump at March for Life

1567911

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Still relying on the ol’ strawman gambit I see HUDS

    No straw man. You want to choose for others. I don’t.
    Funny how this argument doesn't apply to your desire to raise income taxes. You're free to pay more taxes right now. But you don't do it. You want to "choose" for others and force them to pay taxes you're currently unwilling to pay.
    Pressing. Badly.
    Yeah, that's why you won't touch your Gosnell talking point bullshit. Because I'm "pressing."
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited January 2020
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    That's actually a fair point. I don't entirely disagree. Or really disagree at all.

    But, to the extent one agrees, as Race put it, that it's good public policy, then it's probably smart to pay for it among the poors. I don't need the gov. If I need to get someone an abortion, it's going to happen, even if a plane is involved. But if we're going to have it, let's use it to limit the growth of the welfare state. Because if we're bitching about welfare babies now, just make abortion EITHER legally or financially hard to get, and then see what you get.
    That's what abortion was for. Ask Margret. Keep the black population down and get rid of retards.
    Not that it matters, it’s just interesting that you’re rarely right about anything. Sanger was all about contraception, not abortion.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    That's actually a fair point. I don't entirely disagree. Or really disagree at all.

    But, to the extent one agrees, as Race put it, that it's good public policy, then it's probably smart to pay for it among the poors. I don't need the gov. If I need to get someone an abortion, it's going to happen, even if a plane is involved. But if we're going to have it, let's use it to limit the growth of the welfare state. Because if we're bitching about welfare babies now, just make abortion EITHER legally or financially hard to get, and then see what you get.
    That's what abortion was for. Ask Margret. Keep the black population down and get rid of retards.
    Not that it matters, it’s just interesting that you’re rarely right about anything. Sanger was all about contraception, not abortion.
    That's gotta sting coming from the dumb Kunt who still pushes the hands up don't shoot lie and who claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away.

    Tell the folks how you got your nickname O'Keefed.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Still relying on the ol’ strawman gambit I see HUDS

    No straw man. You want to choose for others. I don’t.
    Funny how this argument doesn't apply to your desire to raise income taxes. You're free to pay more taxes right now. But you don't do it. You want to "choose" for others and force them to pay taxes you're currently unwilling to pay.
    Pressing. Badly.
    Yeah, that's why you won't touch your Gosnell talking point bullshit. Because I'm "pressing."
    You didn’t lay a glove on my comment about Gosnell. But feel free to declare victory if you wish.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    That's actually a fair point. I don't entirely disagree. Or really disagree at all.

    But, to the extent one agrees, as Race put it, that it's good public policy, then it's probably smart to pay for it among the poors. I don't need the gov. If I need to get someone an abortion, it's going to happen, even if a plane is involved. But if we're going to have it, let's use it to limit the growth of the welfare state. Because if we're bitching about welfare babies now, just make abortion EITHER legally or financially hard to get, and then see what you get.
    That's what abortion was for. Ask Margret. Keep the black population down and get rid of retards.
    Not that it matters, it’s just interesting that you’re rarely right about anything. Sanger was all about contraception, not abortion.
    That's gotta sting coming from the dumb Kunt who still pushes the hands up don't shoot lie and who claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away.

    Tell the folks how you got your nickname O'Keefed.
    Was it $1.5 million?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited January 2020
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Still relying on the ol’ strawman gambit I see HUDS

    No straw man. You want to choose for others. I don’t.
    Funny how this argument doesn't apply to your desire to raise income taxes. You're free to pay more taxes right now. But you don't do it. You want to "choose" for others and force them to pay taxes you're currently unwilling to pay.
    Pressing. Badly.
    Yeah, that's why you won't touch your Gosnell talking point bullshit. Because I'm "pressing."
    You didn’t lay a glove on my comment about Gosnell. But feel free to declare victory if you wish.
    Yeah, other than refuting your fucking lie that Gosnell was sent to prison for providing late term abortions I didn't touch it.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    That's actually a fair point. I don't entirely disagree. Or really disagree at all.

    But, to the extent one agrees, as Race put it, that it's good public policy, then it's probably smart to pay for it among the poors. I don't need the gov. If I need to get someone an abortion, it's going to happen, even if a plane is involved. But if we're going to have it, let's use it to limit the growth of the welfare state. Because if we're bitching about welfare babies now, just make abortion EITHER legally or financially hard to get, and then see what you get.
    That's what abortion was for. Ask Margret. Keep the black population down and get rid of retards.
    Not that it matters, it’s just interesting that you’re rarely right about anything. Sanger was all about contraception, not abortion.
    That's gotta sting coming from the dumb Kunt who still pushes the hands up don't shoot lie and who claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away.

    Tell the folks how you got your nickname O'Keefed.
    Was it $1.5 million?
    That's it, the city settling with Brown's family proves he really was shot in the back while running away. What a fucking Kunt your are O'Keefed,
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,343
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    Still relying on the ol’ strawman gambit I see HUDS

    No straw man. You want to choose for others. I don’t.
    Funny how this argument doesn't apply to your desire to raise income taxes. You're free to pay more taxes right now. But you don't do it. You want to "choose" for others and force them to pay taxes you're currently unwilling to pay.
    Pressing. Badly.
    Yeah, that's why you won't touch your Gosnell talking point bullshit. Because I'm "pressing."
    You didn’t lay a glove on my comment about Gosnell. But feel free to declare victory if you wish.
    Yeah, other than refuting your fucking lie that Gosnell was sent to prison for providing late term abortions I didn't touch it.
    You obviously weren’t tracking the exchanges. We can’t all age well.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,610 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    That's actually a fair point. I don't entirely disagree. Or really disagree at all.

    But, to the extent one agrees, as Race put it, that it's good public policy, then it's probably smart to pay for it among the poors. I don't need the gov. If I need to get someone an abortion, it's going to happen, even if a plane is involved. But if we're going to have it, let's use it to limit the growth of the welfare state. Because if we're bitching about welfare babies now, just make abortion EITHER legally or financially hard to get, and then see what you get.
    That's what abortion was for. Ask Margret. Keep the black population down and get rid of retards.
    I really don't care what Margaret did or didn't think about anything. I have my own point of view and my own basis for it, and thus don't need to point to some dead person to justify it or change it. It's rhetoric - anything she did or didn't think or say - at this point. I think it's good policy that abortion be legal and available during the first trimester and part of why is that I'm confident the welfare state would explode without it. That I think that, and that it might disproportionately affect a minority group doesn't mean I believe in eugenics.

    I agreed with your point that, if the basis for the freedom to abort is a general concept of liberty and freedom from government interference, then asking the government to pay for it, while not technically a contradiction, does smack of hypocrisy on some level.

    Didn't say you did just pointing out the crackpot in the history of the subject at hand.