Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You've asked for the law

2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
The GAO, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, said in a decision issued Thursday that the White House budget office violated the Impoundment Control Act, a 1974 law that limits the White House from withholding funds that Congress has appropriated.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/01/16/politics/gao-report-administration-violated-law-withholding-aid/index.html
«1

Comments

  • Is this the smoking gun?


  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Is this the smoking gun?


    Oh so breaking a law isn't enough. You must be on the side that he could shoot someone on the street and you'd still vote for him.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,710 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2020
    Ukraine got the funds. Supreme Court ruled several times that Barry broke the law. PIPS broke the law. Good luck. GAOs opinion is worthless.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,675 Founders Club

    Ukraine got the funds. Supreme Court ruled several times that Barry broke the law. PIPS broke the law. Good luck. GAOs opinion is worthless.

    The OMB made clear Thursday, however, that it disagreed with the GAO report.

    “We disagree with GAO's opinion," OMB spokesperson Rachel Semmel said. "OMB uses its apportionment authority to ensure taxpayer dollars are properly spent consistent with the President's priorities and with the law."

    Further, a senior administration official said to Fox News that they believed the GAO was trying to insert itself into impeachment at a time when media attention on the matter is high.

    "GAO’s findings are a pretty clear overreach as they attempt to insert themselves into the media’s controversy of the day. Further, GAO has a history of the flip-flops, reversing 40-years of precedent this year on their pocket rescission decision, they were also forced to reverse a legally faulty opinion when they opposed the reimbursement of federal employee travel costs. In their rush to insert themselves in the impeachment narrative, maybe they’ll have to reverse their opinion again

    Falling for fake news twice is really special
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited January 2020
    FLASHBACK: GAO Found Barack Obama Broke the Law in 2014 and Put US Lives in Danger – But No Calls for His Impeachment


    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/flashback-gao-found-barack-obama-broke-the-law-in-2014-and-put-us-lives-in-danger-but-no-calls-for-his-impeachment/
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.
  • AlexisAlexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,191 Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.

    Actually, kind of looks like Race had a defense that didn't mention Obama once. Or did you miss that one?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Alexis said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.

    Actually, kind of looks like Race had a defense that didn't mention Obama once. Or did you miss that one?
    Yes I'm aware an anonymous senior official told Fox news something. Lol
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited January 2020
    2001400ex said:

    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.

    Illogical, superfluous and moronic, but that is what most of us have come to expect from one as ignorant as you.





  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DJDuck said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.

    Illogical, superfluous and moronic, but that is what most of us have come to expect from one as ignorant as you.


    Some of you kept begging for the law that was broken. I provided it. Sorry that makes your butt pucker.
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited January 2020
    Sorry you have to buy into bullshit and aren’t able to analyze things for yourself. So you are implying that every bit of US aid that is DELAYED for any reason by a president is a crime. That is just insane. Anyone making that argument is also. Use your head you moron.

  • ToiletSeatToiletSeat Member Posts: 150
    He writes "buy into bullshit" in the same thread with links he posted from washington examiner, breitbart and gateway pundit.

    Stop getting your news from facebook.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DJDuck said:

    Sorry you have to buy into bullshit and aren’t able to analyze things for yourself. So you are implying that every bit of US aid that is DELAYED for any reason by a president is a crime. That is just insane. Anyone making that argument is also. Use your head you moron.

    I'm sorry. I thought that you understood, like everyone else who has actually paid attention, that the aid was withheld because a foreign Government didn't investigate a political opponent.
  • AlexisAlexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,191 Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    Alexis said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.

    Actually, kind of looks like Race had a defense that didn't mention Obama once. Or did you miss that one?
    Yes I'm aware an anonymous senior official told Fox news something. Lol
    I can't remember. Are anonymous officials who disagree with someone and leak something to the press good or bad?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Alexis said:

    2001400ex said:

    Alexis said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking your only defense is to point at Obama. Again. El oh El.

    Actually, kind of looks like Race had a defense that didn't mention Obama once. Or did you miss that one?
    Yes I'm aware an anonymous senior official told Fox news something. Lol
    I can't remember. Are anonymous officials who disagree with someone and leak something to the press good or bad?
    That reminds me. Are anonymous officials words backed by official reports by Government investigators not factual?
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    2001400ex said:

    DJDuck said:

    Sorry you have to buy into bullshit and aren’t able to analyze things for yourself. So you are implying that every bit of US aid that is DELAYED for any reason by a president is a crime. That is just insane. Anyone making that argument is also. Use your head you moron.

    I'm sorry. I thought that you understood, like everyone else who has actually paid attention, that the aid was withheld because a foreign Government didn't investigate a political opponent.
    And that is a lie. But then that is a specialty of yours. I know it is difficult to actually discover the truth with such limited abilities. Maybe you could use one of your lifelines like call a friend moron. You couldn’t sniff out the truth with a bloodhounds nose.😂😂😂😂

  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970

    He writes "buy into bullshit" in the same thread with links he posted from washington examiner, breitbart and gateway pundit.

    Stop getting your news from facebook.

    He writes "buy into bullshit" in the same thread with links he posted from washington examiner, breitbart and gateway pundit.

    Stop getting your news from facebook.

    Lowering yourself to a logical fallacy in your argument. Moron libs like yourself. Bare to lazy to argue substance but think attacking a source is actually is a substitute for genuine debate.😂😂😂😂
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970

    He writes "buy into bullshit" in the same thread with links he posted from washington examiner, breitbart and gateway pundit.

    Stop getting your news from facebook.




  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited January 2020
    So do any of you lib morons with TDS care to answer my simple question.


    So you are implying that every bit of US aid that is DELAYED for any reason by a president is a crime?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Trump released the transcript. You can read it for yourself. It's on the interwebs.

    But honestly your meltdown is more fun to watch.
Sign In or Register to comment.