Ranking the Charmin soft Pac for each of UW's title seasons (the results may surprise you)

YellowSnow

Ranking the Charmin soft PAC during each of Washington's title years. I used a weighted system based on Final AP rankings by PAC teams.

1st: 2016- #3 USC, #12 Stanford, #17 Colorado, #23 Utah

2nd: 2000- #4 OSU; #7 Oregon

3rd tie: 1991- #8 Cal (too high); #19 UCLA; #22 Stanford

3rd tie: 1980- #11 USC; #13 UCLA

3rd tie: 1992- #9 Stanford; #15 WSU

6th: 1977- #13 USC; #15 Stanford

7th: 1981- #16 ASU; #19 USC

8th: 2018- #10 WSU

9th: 1990- #20 USC

whlinder

2000... I may be wrong on this but my memory is that the three way tiebreaker between UW, UO and OSU was decided by non conference schedule. Since each team was 7-1 and 1-1 against the other 2.
It then moved to a tiebreaker based on non con record. Oregon had a loss to Wisconsin and then lost it 2-1 vs 3-0 for UW and 2-0/3-0 for OSU (I think they played a 1-AA and that game didn’t count in the evaluation).

Basically all of that to say we had to beat THE U to win the conference.

Edit: https://products.kitsapsun.com/archive/2000/11-10/0040_pac-10_possibilities.html

The Kitsap Sun is my source!

YellowSnow

whlinder said:

2000... I may be wrong on this but my memory is that the three way tiebreaker between UW, UO and OSU was decided by non conference schedule. Since each team was 7-1 and 1-1 against the other 2.
It then moved to a tiebreaker based on non con record. Oregon had a loss to Wisconsin and then lost it 2-1 vs 3-0 for UW and 2-0/3-0 for OSU (I think they played a 1-AA and that game didn’t count in the evaluation).

Basically all of that to say we had to beat THE U to win the conference.

Edit: https://products.kitsapsun.com/archive/2000/11-10/0040_pac-10_possibilities.html

The Kitsap Sun is my source!

Yes. It was a 3 way. We won the tie-breaker.

I want through this exercise, because many here like to say that Pete only won Charmin soft Pac 12's, which isn't entirely true. 2016 had 4 ranked Pac teams vs 2 for the 2000 season. 2018 was soft AF though.

AtomicDawg

Don James never had to beat a ranked Colorado or Utah.

Also. 1992 is missing. And our puppy magical lambo lover faux title in 95 is not on there.

RaceBannon

AtomicDawg said:

Don James never had to beat a ranked Colorado or Utah.

Also. 1992 is missing. And our puppy magical lambo lover faux title in 95 is not on there.

Never *could* beat a ranked Colorado. 0 and 2

PandaOrangeChiknDuck

whlinder said:

2000... I may be wrong on this but my memory is that the three way tiebreaker between UW, UO and OSU was decided by non conference schedule. Since each team was 7-1 and 1-1 against the other 2.
It then moved to a tiebreaker based on non con record. Oregon had a loss to Wisconsin and then lost it 2-1 vs 3-0 for UW and 2-0/3-0 for OSU (I think they played a 1-AA and that game didn’t count in the evaluation).

Basically all of that to say we had to beat THE U to win the conference.

Edit: https://products.kitsapsun.com/archive/2000/11-10/0040_pac-10_possibilities.html

The Kitsap Sun is my source!

I thought the tie breaker was the BCS rankings?

RoadDawg55

You gotta factor in the non conference for some of those years. In 91, UW went on the road to Nebraska and won. I know this is Pac 10/12, but that’s about as good of a road win that a team can have and there is no natty without it.

YellowSnow

AtomicDawg said:

Don James never had to beat a ranked Colorado or Utah.

Also. 1992 is missing. And our puppy magical lambo lover faux title in 95 is not on there.

Huh? I don't know what you're talking about? I had '92 in there.

AtomicDawg

YellowSnow said:

AtomicDawg said:

Don James never had to beat a ranked Colorado or Utah.

Also. 1992 is missing. And our puppy magical lambo lover faux title in 95 is not on there.

Huh? I don't know what you're talking about? I had '92 in there.

You’re smart I am stupid

YellowSnow

AtomicDawg said:

YellowSnow said:

AtomicDawg said:

Don James never had to beat a ranked Colorado or Utah.

Also. 1992 is missing. And our puppy magical lambo lover faux title in 95 is not on there.

Huh? I don't know what you're talking about? I had '92 in there.

You’re smart I am stupid

Nope, you're smart and you matter! I just have magic powers is all.

MikeDamone

.

whlinder said:

2000... I may be wrong on this but my memory is that the three way tiebreaker between UW, UO and OSU was decided by non conference schedule. Since each team was 7-1 and 1-1 against the other 2.
It then moved to a tiebreaker based on non con record. Oregon had a loss to Wisconsin and then lost it 2-1 vs 3-0 for UW and 2-0/3-0 for OSU (I think they played a 1-AA and that game didn’t count in the evaluation).

Basically all of that to say we had to beat THE U to win the conference.

Edit: https://products.kitsapsun.com/archive/2000/11-10/0040_pac-10_possibilities.html

The Kitsap Sun is my source!

And all this husky haters saying the OSU was the “real” champion that year. My response was fuck off, they lost in Seattle. Case closed.

YellowSnow

MikeDamone said:

.

whlinder said:

2000... I may be wrong on this but my memory is that the three way tiebreaker between UW, UO and OSU was decided by non conference schedule. Since each team was 7-1 and 1-1 against the other 2.
It then moved to a tiebreaker based on non con record. Oregon had a loss to Wisconsin and then lost it 2-1 vs 3-0 for UW and 2-0/3-0 for OSU (I think they played a 1-AA and that game didn’t count in the evaluation).

Basically all of that to say we had to beat THE U to win the conference.

Edit: https://products.kitsapsun.com/archive/2000/11-10/0040_pac-10_possibilities.html

The Kitsap Sun is my source!

And all this husky haters saying the OSU was the “real” champion that year. My response was fuck off, they lost in Seattle. Case closed.

No Natty for you Boov!