Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Most important amendment in the US BOR?
Comments
-
II
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term. -
YellowSnow said:
I'm dreading when my kids startPitchfork51 said:If its written by racists, it's chinvalid.
historywhitey is evil and culturally insensitive class in Seattle Public School. -
Read Loewen's Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got WrongYellowSnow said:
I'm dreading when my kids start history class in Seattle Public School.Pitchfork51 said:If its written by racists, it's chinvalid.
there will be a test next Tuesday -
I
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term.
-
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.YellowSnow said:
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
-
II
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)YellowSnow said:
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term. -
I
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.MikeDamone said:
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)YellowSnow said:
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term. -
I
Already read it, Fren.PurpleThrobber said:
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.YellowSnow said:
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
-
II
And?YellowSnow said:
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.MikeDamone said:
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)YellowSnow said:
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term. -
I
It's not dick sucking to appreciate the process.MikeDamone said:
And?YellowSnow said:
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.MikeDamone said:
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)YellowSnow said:
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.YellowSnow said:
Britain is not a tyranny yet.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.YellowSnow said:
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.YellowSnow said:
The UK does. How does that work?Sledog said:
II
Can't keep any of the others without it.
"Free people" is a relative term.
