Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Quit sucking England's dick. My grandpa left there is 1670 for a reason. (Probably because he was broke and had no skills)
John Locke wasn't a Frenchman, guy. England started it. We perfected it.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Already read it, Fren.
Yup. Now get thee to Edinburgh stat and quaff down some haggis and whisky.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Already read it, Fren.
Yup. Now get thee to Edinburgh stat and quaff down some haggis and whisky.
Bruh, I've drunk many bottles of the most peated whisky in the world with members of this bored. More than @MikeDamone has even in his Islay whisky phase.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Already read it, Fren.
Yup. Now get thee to Edinburgh stat and quaff down some haggis and whisky.
Bruh, I've drunk many bottles of the most peated whisky in the world with members of this bored. More than @MikeDamone has even in his Islay whisky phase.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Already read it, Fren.
Yup. Now get thee to Edinburgh stat and quaff down some haggis and whisky.
Bruh, I've drunk many bottles of the most peated whisky in the world with members of this bored. More than @MikeDamone has even in his Islay whisky phase.
I'm not a scotch guy. Can't afford it.
Single malt in this economy? I hear you, @MikeDamone . I'm mostly bourbon because of its superior value ( Blanton's shit poasts aside). I DRINKIG Old Granddad 114 at my desk as we speak. Only $27 BTW. Wonderful discovery I made the other day.
@PurpleThrobber distilling corn rather than barley is the Ulster Scots greatest contribution to civilization. Except Washington was a piece of shit for taxing them for it.
Do they? Try publishing something about the crown and pedophilia in the UK and get back to us.
US has better free speech protections than UK. But deference to the Crown and some differences in libel laws does not mean Brits are not a free people.
Can't carry a pocket knife, can't criticize the crown, definitely don't name your dog Hitler as a joke, pay 40% of your income to the state while your elites offshore their assets.
"Free people" is a relative term.
Britain is not a tyranny yet.
That's kind of the point of the whole thing here though isn't it. Social norms change. Relying on them for the preservation of your societies rights and adherence there to is short sighted. Just look at how many Zoomers don't think freedom of speech is important.
The point of this exercise isn't to say the Brit's (c)onstitution is better than our (C)onstitution. I don't view this as being the case. I'm just saying in the big scheme of things, it's still a free country. And further more, I try to give the mother ship as much respeck as possible, because the primary reason we are the country we are is because of the fact we were founded by freedom loving Englishmen who's ancestors only one century prior did away with absolute monarchy.
Except those poor blokes in Ulster who still say the rosary might disagree just a tad.
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Already read it, Fren.
Yup. Now get thee to Edinburgh stat and quaff down some haggis and whisky.
Bruh, I've drunk many bottles of the most peated whisky in the world with members of this bored. More than @MikeDamone has even in his Islay whisky phase.
I'm not a scotch guy. Can't afford it.
Single malt in this economy? I hear you, @MikeDamone . I'm mostly bourbon because of its superior value ( Blanton's shit poasts aside). I DRINKIG Old Granddad 114 at my desk as we speak. Only $27 BTW. Wonderful discovery I made the other day.
@PurpleThrobber distilling corn rather than barley is the Ulster Scots greatest contribution to civilization. Except Washington was a piece of shit for taxing them for it.
I'm totally down with the N. Ireland whiskys - Bushmills has some really good stuff. Their new Red is more on the bourbon side. I had one of their 16 years on a visit to their distillery a while back and am kicking myself for not buying it there. Destroys the papist whiskys in the Republic further down the island where they were too poor to pay the barley tax. I had some other N. Ireland whiskys in Belfast but was too fucked up to remember which ones.
Comments
there will be a test next Tuesday
Now, if you want to make the argument that the Scots are the primary reason we are the country we are, I could get on that bandwagon...Adam Smith, John Knox, Andrew Carnegie, David Byrne.....
Dago and Scottish. We're taking over the world.
Edit - I hope that is what V is about
and I like voting for losers that won't fake the finals
@PurpleThrobber distilling corn rather than barley is the Ulster Scots greatest contribution to civilization. Except Washington was a piece of shit for taxing them for it.
I'm totally down with the N. Ireland whiskys - Bushmills has some really good stuff. Their new Red is more on the bourbon side. I had one of their 16 years on a visit to their distillery a while back and am kicking myself for not buying it there. Destroys the papist whiskys in the Republic further down the island where they were too poor to pay the barley tax. I had some other N. Ireland whiskys in Belfast but was too fucked up to remember which ones.