Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Perfect answer from Jimmy

2»

Comments

  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 65,396 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Logically better to remove Bush than Gregory if you can only fire one. But goddamnit Gregory just sucks the life out of me. Please for the love of god fire both. And can we swing for the fences and get a legit OC for once? Christ. If we hire anyone who has ever worked for Peterman before i am burning my trailer to the ground.

    Are you gonna then move into Fudgie's mom's basement?
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 65,396 Founders Club

    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
    It was both. Pete’s offense sucked but Hamdan sucks at in game play calling. At least Smiff had the aptitude for in game play calling.
    But did we know that about Smith when he was here?
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
    Selective memory.

    The offense has indeed been shit during Pete's entire tenure.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    That was Bush himself telling that to Garbers which means his couch is already sold.
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    Sounds like Bush is getting a nice severance to stay on and butter up recruits while selling them on a UW without him. Probably an easy job.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,814

    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
    WhyNotBoth.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.