Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon gets bigger and more physical

PHD_DawgPHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
in Hardcore Husky Board
Justin Flowe is a baller. It's cool that our players are nice kids though
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Hey, but our kids grind
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861
    Who has the #1 class in the pac-12 right now? It’s not Oregon lol...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JoeyJoey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,691 Founders Club
    backthepack said:

    Who has the #1 class in the pac-12 right now? It’s not Oregon lol...

    The number 1 team also has their avg dip down because of a punter and a long snapper
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,472 Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    backthepack said:

    Who has the #1 class in the pac-12 right now? It’s not Oregon lol...

    Who led in the game in the third quarter? Not Oregon loloollolloolollool fuck off
    If a game was 45 mins we win!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PandaOrangeChiknDuckPandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    Oregon also got Manning, but it isn't official until Jan 2. That should even things up
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861
    RaceBannon said:

    backthepack said:

    Who has the #1 class in the pac-12 right now? It’s not Oregon lol...

    Who led in the game in the third quarter? Not Oregon loloollolloolollool fuck off
    Hello Pete!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PHD_DawgPHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
    With any luck he'll end up like a lot of these 5-star guys and end up having peaked as a senior in high school
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,787 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    The 1980s were the Golden Era of the Pac 10. The 60s and 70s were the Golden Era of USC

    The SEC couldn't find a quarterback that could hit the broad side of the barn in the 80s.

    Although in before creepy, the 80s were also the Golden Era of the CANES and the Pac 10 didn't win natties while the Big 8 and Miami did
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,207
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    The 1980s were the Golden Era of the Pac 10. The 60s and 70s were the Golden Era of USC

    The SEC couldn't find a quarterback that could hit the broad side of the barn in the 80s.

    Although in before creepy, the 80s were also the Golden Era of the CANES and the Pac 10 didn't win natties while the Big 8 and Miami did
    Yep. As great as the Rose Bowl may be, there were many years in which a great P10 team really didn't want to be matched up with a B 10 team ... it killed national championship chances more than once.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Who fucking cares about Oregon's class? They can still go fuck themselves. I only care about WASHINGTON and its gamble hire next year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,787 Founders Club
    CuntWaffle said:

    Who fucking cares about Oregon's class? They can still go fuck themselves. I only care about WASHINGTON and its gamble hire next year.

    Oregon's class?

    Everyone knows that Oregon has no class!

    rotflmaorlamolmaoroflamao
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,396 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    The 1980s were the Golden Era of the Pac 10. The 60s and 70s were the Golden Era of USC

    The SEC couldn't find a quarterback that could hit the broad side of the barn in the 80s.

    Although in before creepy, the 80s were also the Golden Era of the CANES and the Pac 10 didn't win natties while the Big 8 and Miami did
    Didn't 1984 UCLA beat @creepycoug 's favorite moobs, Jimmy Johnson in hist first year? PAC 12 would have probably cleaned up in the 80s had there been a CFP.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,787 Founders Club
    edited December 2019
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    The 1980s were the Golden Era of the Pac 10. The 60s and 70s were the Golden Era of USC

    The SEC couldn't find a quarterback that could hit the broad side of the barn in the 80s.

    Although in before creepy, the 80s were also the Golden Era of the CANES and the Pac 10 didn't win natties while the Big 8 and Miami did
    Didn't 1984 UCLA beat @creepycoug 's favorite moobs, Jimmy Johnson in hist first year? PAC 12 would have probably cleaned up in the 80s had there been a CFP.
    Yes in the Fiesta Bowl but the Canes always lose the Fiesta Bowl

    Jimmy took over the National Champs from Howard and had no defense all year. That was the Flutie hail mary year too

    Edit to agree on the playoff but no one really seemed to be clamoring for it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,207
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    I’m glad to have a good rivalry going. Maybe the PAC 12 won’t be seen as worthless by the rest of the country in a year or two.

    Me too except I want to win the next 10 anyway

    As long as USC sucks UW won't get much credit and Oregon has wormed their way to get a bit more as discussed in recruiting hype. It will still be winning a down Pac if USC isn't there. Same as it ever was

    Now if Oregon and Washington win the Power 5 non con games and bowl games that could change
    It's amazing the corches voted us National Champs for winning a down Pac. Good the 1980s Pac was still fresh in everyone's memory and we had a classy, gritty win in Lincoln.
    The 1980s were the Golden Era of the Pac 10. The 60s and 70s were the Golden Era of USC

    The SEC couldn't find a quarterback that could hit the broad side of the barn in the 80s.

    Although in before creepy, the 80s were also the Golden Era of the CANES and the Pac 10 didn't win natties while the Big 8 and Miami did
    Didn't 1984 UCLA beat @creepycoug 's favorite moobs, Jimmy Johnson in hist first year? PAC 12 would have probably cleaned up in the 80s had there been a CFP.
    Big qualifier there. JJ's first year, he left the offense alone and completely reinvented the defense. That same year, Hail Flutie happened, as did the Boomer Esiason-led Terps comeback from a 31-0 half-tim deficit.

    Tl;dr version: Miami had no defense that year and lost a number of high scoring shootouts - specifically the last three games of the season, including the UCLA game.

    Of course, what Jimmy would do there going forward was make Miami into a defensive juggernaut. But that year, everyone was crying to have him fired, because they'd just won the national championship the year before.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BeerThirtyBeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    sonics1993 said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    Justin Flowe is a baller. It's cool that our players are nice kids though

    After Flowe and Sewell there is a huge drop off in talent. While i'm jealous about there linebackers, it's not liked they killed it which is suprising since they just went 10-2.
    THANK YOU!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.