On that Clemson path

Bread

https://twitter.com/RowlandRIVALS/status/1207081190949294086?s=19

When was the last time Clemson had 0 Dline in a class?

sonics1993

Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.

FireCohen

Let’s stop all the Clemson talk. We got our shit pushed in by Colorado.

RoadDawg55

sonics1993 said:

Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.

There is no reason we can’t have top 10 classes, but there are so many more players to pull in the South than the West Coast. It’s not an excuse, it’s a reality.

sonics1993

RoadDawg55 said:

sonics1993 said:

Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.

There is no reason we can’t have top 10 classes, but there are so many more players to pull in the South than the West Coast. It’s not an excuse, it’s a reality.

For UW to have a top 10 class they need to have the best instate class ever and they need to land every single one of them along with hitting most of there other targets. In the south, you can miss a lot more since theres so much talent. Plus USC needs to be terrible because if USC is on then you can forget about it.

RaceBannon

When the west does have a national champion they have great lines on both sides of the ball. USC many times. UW a couple or so

USC got every great lineman out west and recruited nationally

UW got Cunningham from Virginia but the rest of the 91 team was California and Washington

You can't miss. You cant let Smalls or JT go south

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Winners will win. Losers have a great excuse as always

I really hope Jimmy is the answer. I'm not getting any younger

RoadDawg55

sonics1993 said:

RoadDawg55 said:

sonics1993 said:

Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.

There is no reason we can’t have top 10 classes, but there are so many more players to pull in the South than the West Coast. It’s not an excuse, it’s a reality.

For UW to have a top 10 class they need to have the best instate class ever and they need to land every single one of them along with hitting most of there other targets. In the south, you can miss a lot more since theres so much talent. Plus USC needs to be terrible because if USC is on then you can forget about it.

Yep, a really good in state class along with a couple really high 4 star/5 star guys from Cali and it can be done.

AtomicDawg

RoadDawg55 said:

sonics1993 said:

RoadDawg55 said:

sonics1993 said:

Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.

There is no reason we can’t have top 10 classes, but there are so many more players to pull in the South than the West Coast. It’s not an excuse, it’s a reality.

For UW to have a top 10 class they need to have the best instate class ever and they need to land every single one of them along with hitting most of there other targets. In the south, you can miss a lot more since theres so much talent. Plus USC needs to be terrible because if USC is on then you can forget about it.

Yep, a really good in state class along with a couple really high 4 star/5 star guys from Cali and it can be done.

Last year plus stephon Wright and Kyle Ford is not that far off.

bananasnblondes

AtomicDawg said:

RoadDawg55 said:

sonics1993 said:

RoadDawg55 said:

sonics1993 said:

Compare the talent in the south to the west, that's why we will never be Clemson.

There is no reason we can’t have top 10 classes, but there are so many more players to pull in the South than the West Coast. It’s not an excuse, it’s a reality.

For UW to have a top 10 class they need to have the best instate class ever and they need to land every single one of them along with hitting most of there other targets. In the south, you can miss a lot more since theres so much talent. Plus USC needs to be terrible because if USC is on then you can forget about it.

Yep, a really good in state class along with a couple really high 4 star/5 star guys from Cali and it can be done.

Last year plus stephon Wright and Kyle Ford is not that far off.

Or this year if we had offered Gee Scott early, taken DJ Rodgers and Banks, and had taken Levi over Peacock.

AtomicDawg

If you go by just 247 rankings last year was a top 10 class. The year before was 13. This year could be in the top 10 or slide just outside.

CallMeBigErn

AtomicDawg said:

If you go by just 247 rankings last year was a top 10 class. The year before was 13. This year could be in the top 10 or slide just outside.

And next year's class will be the greatest recruiting class in the history of the galaxy lol hth

Beno4Life

Need Gee, Ringo, Carlton, Yary (not West), and a Flowe/Sewell (not McDonald).

You take high 3-stars and local studs like Esteen, Sawyer, and Bruener. But not middle-tier 3-stars like Smith, McDonald, and I hate to say Sunday cause I’m liking the kids story and how he plays with aggression, a la Dick, but yeah.

dtd

Eh, UW had what, six 4 star OL/DL last year?

dtd

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

AtomicDawg

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

*insert coach* never had to deal with a ranked *insert opponent* hot take.

RaceBannon

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

Did I stutter?

Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl

We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting

dtd

RaceBannon said:

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

Did I stutter?

Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl

We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting

Or with being limited to 85 scholarships.

AtomicDawg

RaceBannon said:

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

Did I stutter?

Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl

We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting

UCLA tried back then so whatever. There’s always an excuse. Fifo or get out the way.

RaceBannon

AtomicDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

Did I stutter?

Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl

We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting

UCLA tried back then so whatever. There’s always an excuse. Fifo or get out the way.

Agree

RaceBannon

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

Did I stutter?

Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl

We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting

Or with being limited to 85 scholarships.

There's the quook

dtd

RaceBannon said:

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

dtd said:

RaceBannon said:

And now we have Oregon to contend with

Now?

Did I stutter?

Brooks was three years away from the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl

We did not have to contend with Oregon in recruiting

Or with being limited to 85 scholarships.

There's the quook

Not really. Clearly 85 leveled the playing field that UW was somewhat dominating. But it's been 25 fucking years, Race. Which program has a better record in the last THIRTY years? It's Oregon. And yeah, fuck '84 BYU. Was Kelee Ringo's mom even born yet? I get that you're you, but JFC, the context of everything CFB doesn't need to go back to Sonny Sixkiller to be valid.