Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«134

Comments

  • Options
    DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,482
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    When you read what Charlie says, it's actually quite stunning.
  • Options
    WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,741
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Impeachment, acquittal, re-election, cook it. Trump is a national disgrace but so are the dems.
  • Options
    LebamDawgLebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,541
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Impeachment, acquittal, re-election, cook it. Trump is a national disgrace but so are the dems.


    most hated republican ever and he is killing the dems daily
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

    Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,749
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

    Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

    Since no shakedown existed imagination and hatred and lying are indeed required. Oh and envy.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,330
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

    Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

    That's kinda my take on it. Trump tried to do a "hey buddy" on that Ukranian. Because Trump's undisciplined, and more importantly because it appears he's widely disliked within the staffer ranks, he got caught. I also think versions of this exchange go on all the time.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

    Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

    That's kinda my take on it. Trump tried to do a "hey buddy" on that Ukranian. Because Trump's undisciplined, and more importantly because it appears he's widely disliked within the staffer ranks, he got caught. I also think versions of this exchange go on all the time.
    Kind of Mick Mulvaney’s original position?
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

    Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

    That's kinda my take on it. Trump tried to do a "hey buddy" on that Ukranian. Because Trump's undisciplined, and more importantly because it appears he's widely disliked within the staffer ranks, he got caught. I also think versions of this exchange go on all the time.
    Kind of Mick Mulvaney’s original position?
    Who?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
    If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

    The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

    Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

    The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


    If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic
    What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
    If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

    The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

    Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

    The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


    If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic
    What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?
    Innocence in international politics. Big, if true.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,330
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
    If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

    The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

    Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

    The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


    If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic
    What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?
    Trump ran on getting the Euros to pay their fair share and to not send money down rat holes to corrupt governments


    He reviewed the aid and it got sent. Unlike under Obama. Were you in favor of impeaching Obama?

    And the corruption was real. See, Biden, Hunter
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
    If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

    The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

    Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

    The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


    If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic
    What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?
    Aid was delivered weeks before the confessional resolution required it.

    But how are you a dumbfuck?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
    If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

    The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

    Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

    The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


    If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic
    What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?
    Trump ran on getting the Euros to pay their fair share and to not send money down rat holes to corrupt governments


    He reviewed the aid and it got sent. Unlike under Obama. Were you in favor of impeaching Obama?

    And the corruption was real. See, Biden, Hunter
    Trump didn’t withhold aid from the previous government. Joe’s brag about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired had been out there for years—not locked up in a top secret server. What had changed? Hint: Joe had entered the race and polls said he’d beat Trump in the general.

    Like I said, the “innocent explanations” are preposterous.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

    The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.
    If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

    The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

    Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

    The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


    If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic
    What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?
    Innocence in international politics. Big, if true.
    Didn’t you just go on record saying that it probably was a shakedown?
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,904
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    The working leftard position was that Trump should be impeached for Russian collusion paid for by PIPS and with false information supplied by Russian intelligence and with information to be gathered with FISA warrants secured by supplying the court with false statements. The leftards next position is that there was nothing wrong with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company paying off the Biden family with millions of dollars paid to a cokehead who knew nothing about the energy industry. In fact, Biden bragged about the threat to hold up aid if the prosecutor looking into Burisma and Hunter corruption if the Ukrainian government didn’t fire the prosecutor – which they did. Pro- Russian Ukrainians were also involved with releasing documents involving Trump campaign officials.

    So, it’s okay for leftards to investigate supposed corruption of Trump in 2016 but it’s not okay to investigate real dem corruption in 2016. Biden counseled against providing military aid. Trump provided military aid. And yet, Trump is still alleged by leftards to be Putin’s bitch.

  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,749
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Funnier is Trump using a plural when talking about looking into the Bidens and says talk to the attorney general.

    Trump should be impeached for reporting criminal activity of three Bidens.

    It is Trumps duty to report it but don't let that bother you.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    The working leftard position was that Trump should be impeached for Russian collusion paid for by PIPS and with false information supplied by Russian intelligence and with information to be gathered with FISA warrants secured by supplying the court with false statements. The leftards next position is that there was nothing wrong with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company paying off the Biden family with millions of dollars paid to a cokehead who knew nothing about the energy industry. In fact, Biden bragged about the threat to hold up aid if the prosecutor looking into Burisma and Hunter corruption if the Ukrainian government didn’t fire the prosecutor – which they did. Pro- Russian Ukrainians were also involved with releasing documents involving Trump campaign officials.

    So, it’s okay for leftards to investigate supposed corruption of Trump in 2016 but it’s not okay to investigate real dem corruption in 2016. Biden counseled against providing military aid. Trump provided military aid. And yet, Trump is still alleged by leftards to be Putin’s bitch.

    Congress provided military aid. Daddy withheld it—and without a word to Congress. That in itself was illegal. But people from both parties came to wonder why the aid wasn’t being sent and Daddy, rather than defending his actions, caved when caught. All obvious hallmarks of total innocence, of course.
Sign In or Register to comment.