Impeachment

Sledog

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1205530889960280064?s=20

DoogieMcDoogerson

When you read what Charlie says, it's actually quite stunning.

WilburHooksHands

Impeachment, acquittal, re-election, cook it. Trump is a national disgrace but so are the dems.

LebamDawg

WilburHooksHands said:

Impeachment, acquittal, re-election, cook it. Trump is a national disgrace but so are the dems.

most hated republican ever and he is killing the dems daily

HHusky

Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

Sledog

HHusky said:

Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

Since no shakedown existed imagination and hatred and lying are indeed required. Oh and envy.

RaceBannon

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

GrundleStiltzkin

HHusky said:

Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

That's kinda my take on it. Trump tried to do a "hey buddy" on that Ukranian. Because Trump's undisciplined, and more importantly because it appears he's widely disliked within the staffer ranks, he got caught. I also think versions of this exchange go on all the time.

HHusky

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

That's kinda my take on it. Trump tried to do a "hey buddy" on that Ukranian. Because Trump's undisciplined, and more importantly because it appears he's widely disliked within the staffer ranks, he got caught. I also think versions of this exchange go on all the time.

Kind of Mick Mulvaney’s original position?

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

GrundleStiltzkin

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

Just heard Slade Gorton say Trump did a “shake down”. Said he was still thinking about whether that should lead to removal.

Imagine actually having that kind of honest discussion. Unfortunately, we do have to imagine.

That's kinda my take on it. Trump tried to do a "hey buddy" on that Ukranian. Because Trump's undisciplined, and more importantly because it appears he's widely disliked within the staffer ranks, he got caught. I also think versions of this exchange go on all the time.

Kind of Mick Mulvaney’s original position?

Who?

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?

GrundleStiltzkin

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?

Innocence in international politics. Big, if true.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?

Trump ran on getting the Euros to pay their fair share and to not send money down rat holes to corrupt governments


He reviewed the aid and it got sent. Unlike under Obama. Were you in favor of impeaching Obama?

And the corruption was real. See, Biden, Hunter

pawz

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?

Aid was delivered weeks before the confessional resolution required it.

But how are you a dumbfuck?

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?

Trump ran on getting the Euros to pay their fair share and to not send money down rat holes to corrupt governments


He reviewed the aid and it got sent. Unlike under Obama. Were you in favor of impeaching Obama?

And the corruption was real. See, Biden, Hunter

Trump didn’t withhold aid from the previous government. Joe’s brag about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired had been out there for years—not locked up in a top secret server. What had changed? Hint: Joe had entered the race and polls said he’d beat Trump in the general.

Like I said, the “innocent explanations” are preposterous.

HHusky

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all

The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.

If that was the case you and Slade would not be bemoaning no one believing your imagination

The attempt to criminalize actions of the POTUS you don't like fell apart at the start with the transcript

Now you find yourself having to call the people you claim you are defending liars because they don't have your imagination either

The aid got there unlike under Obama. The Ukraine says no leverage was applied. The key witness Sondland said Trump told him he didn't want anything.,


If you think this is grounds for impeachment go down with the rest of the ship of fools. But spare us the phony moralizing about the future of the Republic

What’s the innocent explanation for withholding the aid in the first place?

Innocence in international politics. Big, if true.

Didn’t you just go on record saying that it probably was a shakedown?

WestlinnDuck

The working leftard position was that Trump should be impeached for Russian collusion paid for by PIPS and with false information supplied by Russian intelligence and with information to be gathered with FISA warrants secured by supplying the court with false statements. The leftards next position is that there was nothing wrong with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company paying off the Biden family with millions of dollars paid to a cokehead who knew nothing about the energy industry. In fact, Biden bragged about the threat to hold up aid if the prosecutor looking into Burisma and Hunter corruption if the Ukrainian government didn’t fire the prosecutor – which they did. Pro- Russian Ukrainians were also involved with releasing documents involving Trump campaign officials.

So, it’s okay for leftards to investigate supposed corruption of Trump in 2016 but it’s not okay to investigate real dem corruption in 2016. Biden counseled against providing military aid. Trump provided military aid. And yet, Trump is still alleged by leftards to be Putin’s bitch.

Sledog

Funnier is Trump using a plural when talking about looking into the Bidens and says talk to the attorney general.

Trump should be impeached for reporting criminal activity of three Bidens.

It is Trumps duty to report it but don't let that bother you.

HHusky

WestlinnDuck said:

The working leftard position was that Trump should be impeached for Russian collusion paid for by PIPS and with false information supplied by Russian intelligence and with information to be gathered with FISA warrants secured by supplying the court with false statements. The leftards next position is that there was nothing wrong with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company paying off the Biden family with millions of dollars paid to a cokehead who knew nothing about the energy industry. In fact, Biden bragged about the threat to hold up aid if the prosecutor looking into Burisma and Hunter corruption if the Ukrainian government didn’t fire the prosecutor – which they did. Pro- Russian Ukrainians were also involved with releasing documents involving Trump campaign officials.

So, it’s okay for leftards to investigate supposed corruption of Trump in 2016 but it’s not okay to investigate real dem corruption in 2016. Biden counseled against providing military aid. Trump provided military aid. And yet, Trump is still alleged by leftards to be Putin’s bitch.

Congress provided military aid. Daddy withheld it—and without a word to Congress. That in itself was illegal. But people from both parties came to wonder why the aid wasn’t being sent and Daddy, rather than defending his actions, caved when caught. All obvious hallmarks of total innocence, of course.